New Delhi: In a ruling reinforcing the reformative spirit of the Juvenile Justice Act, the Allahabad High Court has held that an offence committed as a juvenile cannot be used to disqualify someone from a job as an adult.
The court’s 21 May ruling clarifies an important area of service law and also strengthens the broader philosophy underpinning the juvenile justice system – that young offenders should be given a chance for reform and rehabilitation.
“It would be highly improper and unjustifiable to deprive a person of his livelihood merely on the basis of his alleged involvement in a criminal case,” Justice Shree Prakash Singh said.
The ruling came in a case related to Shusheel Tripathi, who successfully cleared the recruitment process for the post of Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS) under the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation ESIC.
Following a two-stage examination process and document verification, he was issued an offer of appointment in July 2024.
Despite completing all formal requirements, Tripathi’s joining letter was withheld after he disclosed in his attestation form that he had been involved in two cases: one from 2015, in which he was treated as a juvenile, and another from 2020, which was closed for lack of evidence.
The authorities cited the pendency of police verification and the need for legal opinion as reasons for delay.
The matter then reached the High Court after Tripathi challenged the delay in issuing him the joining letter.
The court examined the issue through the lens of juvenile justice, which emphasises reform, rehabilitation and a second chance rather than punishment.
The High Court (Lucknow Bench) directed the authorities to issue a joining letter to the petitioner.
“The petitioner cannot be thrown to suffer for an unlimited period of time, to wait for a job, because of the pending final report for its adjudication.”
The court held that one of the cases pertained to an offence committed when the petitioner was a minor, and he could not be disqualified on account of the case arising during his minority.
Referring to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, the court emphasised that even if a juvenile is convicted, such a conviction shall not operate as a disqualification for employment purposes.
The judgment reinforced the principle that the law intends to provide a “fresh start” to juveniles, ensuring they are reintegrated into society without any stigma or prejudice.
At its core, juvenile law recognises that children and adolescents are still in the process of growth and development.
Mistakes made during this formative period are not to be treated as permanent markers of character, but as opportunities for correction and reform, and the law protects them from carrying lifelong stigma for mistakes made at a young age.
With respect to the second case, the court noted that the police had already filed a final report indicating a lack of evidence.
The court held that where allegations are not serious and the investigation indicates no culpability, a candidate should not be indefinitely prejudiced in employment due to procedural delays.
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also Read: Indian justice system fails children every day: Madan Lokur