Mysuru (Karnataka), Apr 20 (PTI) Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Monday accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of adopting a “double standard” on women’s reservation, alleging that the Centre had delayed implementation despite having the opportunity to act earlier.
Addressing reporters here, Siddaramaiah said the BJP and Modi had earlier opposed welfare guarantees and were now replicating them, while also questioning the timing and intent behind the women’s reservation move.
“That’s what I call double standards. Narendra Modi is not for social justice. If he were, this would have been done long ago. How many years has he been in power? It’s been 12 years. Why hasn’t it been done so far?” he asked.
The chief minister reiterated that the Congress had consistently supported women’s reservation and accused the Centre of “politicising” the issue.
When reporters asked him what the prime minister told him in his ear at the airport during his recent visit to Bengaluru, Siddaramaiah said, “We spoke about women’s reservation. The prime minister asked me what our stand was. I said we are in favour of women’s reservation.” He maintained that delimitation should only be carried out after a fresh Census to ensure equitable representation among states.
“In my view, delimitation should be done after a new census. That is why we opposed it. We have not opposed women’s reservation. We have always supported it,” he said.
Highlighting the past role of Congress, he said, “Who brought the 73rd and 74th amendments? It was the Congress party. Those amendments ensured reservations for women in local bodies. Why would we oppose it?” Siddaramaiah further questioned the Union government’s delay in the implementation of the Women’s Reservation Act 2023.
“Why didn’t he implement it immediately? Then why did he wait so long? He could have implemented it immediately. If he is committed to women’s reservation, he should have implemented it,” he said.
On the linkage between delimitation and reservation, he asked, “Why did the Centre link it with delimitation? Why did it go for a constitutional amendment?” adding that such a move could disadvantage southern states that have successfully controlled population growth.
“Southern states have controlled population well, but northern states haven’t. Naturally, it benefits them and disadvantages us,” he said.
Responding to the BJP’s criticism that women would “teach Congress a lesson,” Siddaramaiah said, “They are doing politics. If Modi had implemented this earlier, who would have opposed women’s reservation?” On electoral prospects elsewhere, he said he had no direct information on Tamil Nadu but was optimistic about the ruling DMK’s victory.
“According to the information I have, DMK and its alliance are likely to win,” while asserting that Kerala would also be won by the opposition.
In a major setback to the BJP-led Central government, the Constitution (131st Amendment) bill that sought to facilitate the implementation of women’s reservation in legislatures by expanding the strength of the Lok Sabha, apart from making changes to delimitation, was defeated on April 17.
While 298 members voted in support of the bill in the Lok Sabha, 230 MPs voted against it. Out of 528 members who voted, the bill required 352 votes for a two-thirds majority. Seats were also to be increased in state and Union territory Assemblies to accommodate 33 per cent reservation for women. PTI GMS GMS ADB
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.