scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Friday, August 28, 2026

Support our Journalism

9th Anniversary: Free Tote & Mug

Subscribe
HomeIndiaThane court calls CBI arrest of IRS officer, 2 others in Rs...

Thane court calls CBI arrest of IRS officer, 2 others in Rs 1.5-crore bribery case ‘not legal’

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi, Aug 28 (PTI) A Thane court on Friday held that the CBI arrests of a senior IRS officer posted in Maharashtra’s Raigad district and two others in an alleged Rs 1.5-crore bribery case were “not legal”, citing arrest procedure “was not in accordance with law”, and ordered their release on personal bonds of Rs 15,000 each.

The court also rejected the CBI’s request for their custodial interrogation, noting that the bribe money has already been seized and, in a personal search, mobiles of all accused were also recovered; hence, there were no “satisfactory reasons” for further custodial interrogation.

“CBI will again approach the concerned court for obtaining custody of the accused persons for proper investigation of this bribery case as CBI has scrupulously followed all legal requirements for the arrest of the accused persons, including communicating the grounds of arrest to the concerned,” sources said.

The CBI had produced Additional Commissioner of CGST Vinay Kumar Kantheti, a 2009-batch Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer, CGST Superintendent Rakesh Kumar Sinha and private person Narinder Rajput before the court on Friday, hours after their arrest, seeking police custody for further questioning.

In its order, the court noted that the investigating officer had submitted a case diary containing “papers tied with a tag” which were “loosely tightened”.

“Therefore, they were not in accordance with the provisions as prescribed in law,” In-charge Additional Sessions Judge MS Lone observed.

The court said the place of arrest seems to be the CBI office, or it was one and the same place in Panvel.

“To see whether the accused persons were informed about the grounds and reasons of arrest. For this purpose there is an arrest memo in case diary which is in prescribed form and it is been filled in typography.

“This indicates that the official have themselves prepared the arrest memo without considering whether the grounds and reason of arrest were understood accused person or not. Their relatives were not informed in writing. Therefore I have come to conclusion that the arrest all accused is not legal,” it said.

The court, while refusing to grant police custody, said the CBI had already seized the alleged bribe money and recovered the mobiles of all three accused during their personal searches. It found no “satisfactory reasons” for further custodial interrogation.

The court subsequently ordered the release of all three accused on personal bonds of Rs 15,000 each.

The CBI had earlier registered an FIR against Sinha based on allegations that he had demanded a bribe to settle a GST and royalty matter involving a stone-quarrying firm, according to a statement issued by the agency earlier in the day.

According to the CBI, the alleged bribe demand of Rs 1.5 crore was subsequently reduced to Rs 40 lakh following negotiations.

“The accused public servants had arranged for collection of the bribe amount through a private person and accordingly directed the complainant,” a CBI spokesperson said in the statement.

The agency said its team laid a trap on Thursday and caught Rajput while he was allegedly accepting Rs 40 lakh. Kantheti and Sinha were arrested subsequently, it said.

Following the arrests, the CBI conducted searches at premises linked to the accused and recovered Rs 43 lakh in cash and jewellery valued at around Rs 90 lakh, the agency said. PTI ABS NB NB

This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

  • Tags

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular