scorecardresearch
Saturday, November 2, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaSmriti Irani didn’t want Jagadesh Kumar as JNU V-C but Pranab Mukherjee...

Smriti Irani didn’t want Jagadesh Kumar as JNU V-C but Pranab Mukherjee picked him anyway

Amid calls for JNU V-C’s sacking, ThePrint finds then-HRD minister Smriti Irani thought he was unsuitable, but President Mukherjee picked him from a 4-man shortlist.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: A day after students and teachers were assaulted at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and property damaged on the campus, the pressure is now mounting on the Ministry of Human Resource Development to sack the vice-chancellor, Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar.

Kumar’s tenure has been a controversial one — right from the 2016 sedition row, to the November incident where HRD Minister Ramesh Pokhriyal ‘Nishank’ got stuck for a few hours during the JNU convocation, to the ongoing row over increased hostel fees, which have resulted in non-stop protests by students since October.

However, Kumar wasn’t even the HRD ministry’s top choice when he was appointed the JNU V-C in 2016, according to an official document accessed by ThePrint. The minister at the time, Smriti Irani, was not in favour of appointing him, since Kumar was teaching at IIT-Delhi then, and Irani felt he didn’t fit the university system.

Irani had recommended the name of scientist V.S. Chauhan, but Kumar’s name was also on the four-name shortlist sent to then-President Pranab Mukherjee. And Kumar’s was the name the President chose.

As a rule, the President is not bound to follow the recommendation of the HRD minister, but officials say it is the usual practice.


Also read: JNU attack aided by administration, says teachers association, demands V-C’s resignation


The note

Joint secretary S.S. Sandhu’s note had informed the President: “Of the panel of four candidates, Prof. Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar is Professor of Electrical Engineering at IIT Delhi. The IIT system differs fundamentally from that of a university, including in the culture, structure and functioning.

“Two persons, namely Prof. R.N.K. Bamezai and Prof. Ramakrishna Ramaswamy, belong to JNU itself and are thus insiders and would be having an insider’s perception and outlook, and not an outsider perception that may benefit JNU by bringing about enrichment, academic development and new academic culture, techniques, methodologies etc,” the note added.

“Padmashri V.S. Chauhan has considerable academic and administrative experience of the university system, both in India and abroad. He has rich research experience and has guided many research students. Having held the posts of director general and director of ICGEB for a number of years, he is endowed with proven administrative acumen and experience of the management of research and teaching institutions.”

Irani’s recommendation in the note read: “In light of the position explained above, Prof. V.S. Chauhan would appear to have the most credentials, experience, academic attainments, recognition and exposure, hence his name may be strongly recommended.”


Also read: HRD ministry meets JNU officials to take stock, Vice-Chancellor skips meeting


RSS link, which he denies

Jagadesh Kumar completed his Master’s and Ph.D. degrees from IIT-Madras, and has worked in the field of nanoelectronic devices, nanoscale device modelling and simulation, and semi-conductor devices.

When he was appointed the JNU V-C, it was said that he was associated with the RSS — a link he denied, saying he had only attended an event at IIT-Delhi organised by RSS affiliate Vijnana Bharati.

Jagadesh Kumar also attended the third India Ideas Conclave organised in Goa by the India Foundation, an independent think-tank that has ties with the BJP.

His views on a number of issues reflect those of the BJP and RSS. For instance, during the 2018 convocation address, he stressed on the need for the students to engage with issues like illegal immigrants “posing a threat to national security”.

“Your generation has to engage with society more closely as compared to your predecessors, simply because the challenges our human societies face today are enormous — climate change, food security, energy security, clean water scarcity, health risks, degrading bio-diversity, man-made and natural disasters, terrorism, illegal immigrants posing a threat to national security and so on,” Kumar said.

He also highlighted the need for “improving quality of life rather than standard of living, working towards spiritual development rather than just material security”, echoing the RSS.


Also read: Appealing for peace, JNU V-C says protecting academic interest of students is top priority


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

7 COMMENTS

  1. Safeguarding national interest (gratitude and love for the nation) should be the first teaching in a places like JNU, where people seem to have forgotten that the whole infrastructure and facility is feeding on the taxes paid by the citizens. Time and again it has been proven that a significant number of people practice more politics over there than anything else. Any upright professor (teacher) will feel the necessity of stressing on nationalism in a place like this – we won’t be able able to associate this with any political alignment. Government’s spending on many many other institutions of excellence in India are paying back huge dividends where students are extremely busy in there pursuit of academic excellence. This is a general complain that nation would certainly have against the pupil and the situations prevailing over there.

  2. Now it is high time to review the appointment systems of the VCs and also ensure that there is regular quarterly review system of VCs in Indis. Incompetent management of leading universities is making a big dent in India’s development. VC with no respect among students and faculty should not be appointed. Why PMO is not asking HRD ministry to submit a quarterly report with objective criteria on score sheet about the output of the universities in nation-building. Like PSU, there must be pre-defined Key Performance indicators (KPIs) for all VCs and HODs in universities. If they can’t deliver they should be asked to go. Please note every good professor may not be a good administrator. learn from US and UK universities how to create world-class universities. VC post must not be just a for power and perks position.

  3. What is once ideological belief to
    do with administrative ability?
    This write up seems to insinuate
    that only with BJP/RSS ideology
    cannot be a good administrator!
    What nonsense is this
    Written for the consumption of
    so called liberal/left people only!

  4. Ye pura brahmin site hai yaha khud ko neutral batane ke lie ek do news likhte hai baki bjp ka propoganda chalate hai, this thing will not useful for you it can only run now by bjp it cell, evryone knows tata funded you, please be neutral

  5. If the two JNU insiders had merit, they should not have been excluded on the ground that an outsider would be better. Given the culture and ethos of JNU, someone with a background in the humanities would have been more suitable.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular