New Delhi, Sep 2 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Tuesday outlined the right to seek remission of convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for the rest of their lives in gangrape cases involving minors, calling it not only a constitutional right but also a statutory one.
Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan was dealing with a plea challenging the constitutional validity of Section 376DA of the erstwhile IPC.
Section 376DA deals with the punishment for gangrape on a minor girl under 16 years.
The counsel appearing for an applicant seeking to be impleaded in the case said the expression “shall” in Section 376DA would mean that the sessions court had no other option except impose life imprisonment, meaning a jail term for the remainder of that person’s natural life.
The bench examined two aspects with the first being on the punishment prescribed under the provision that has to be imposed post the sessions court trial and which could be challenged before a high court and the Supreme Court.
“The other aspect of the matter is that even if such a punishment is imposed on an accused, he has the right of remission in accordance with Article 72 or Article 161 of the Constitution of India as the case may be, by making an application for remission before President of India or before Governor of a state,” the bench said.
In addition, the top court said, such an accused also had a statutory remedy to seek remission of the sentence.
“Therefore, the right to seek remission is not only a constitutional right but also a statutory right and each state has its own policy of remission… which is applicable even when the sentence is imposed under section 376DA or for that matter section 376DB of the IPC,” the bench said.
Section 376 DB deals with punishment for gangrape on a minor girl under 12 years.
The top court noted life term imprisonment awarded under Sections 376DA or 376DB for the remainder of natural life, would not take away the right of an accused to seek remission under the Constitution, the statutory scheme and the applicable remission police in each state.
The counsel said the punishment prescribed under Section 376DA of IPC would imply that there could be no mitigating circumstances related to the convict that could be considered.
The bench noted the Centre has supported Section 376DA of IPC.
The top court subsequently left open the legal question raised by the petitioner on the prescription of sole type of sentence under Section 376DA and said it could be agitated in an appropriate case.
“Therefore, keeping open the question of law to be advanced in an appropriate case,” the bench said while disposing of the plea and application for impleadment. PTI ABA ABA AMK AMK
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.