Protest against Citizenship Amendment Bill
Activists raise slogans during a protest against Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB), in Guwahati | PTI photo
Text Size:

Bengaluru: In a statement circulated online, more than 1,000 Indian scientists and scholars from the country and abroad have released a statement opposing the Citizenship Amendment Bill tabled Lok Sabha by the Narendra Modi government Monday.

The 2019 bill, which was approved by the Union cabinet on 4 December, seeks to grant citizenship to non-Muslim refugees from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan if they faced religious persecution there.

In the statement, the scientists have argued that the “use of religion as a criterion for citizenship” would be a “radical break” with the idea of independent, post-colonial India. The bill is a proposed amendment to the Citizenship Act 1955 and would reduce the residence period in India from 11 years to six years to obtain citizenship.

Drafted over the weekend, the statement gathered over 1,000 signatures within 24 hours. These include scientists and research scholars from institutions such as various IITs, the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS, Bengaluru), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR, Mumbai), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Indian Statistical Institute, and different IISERs as well as international institutes such as Harvard University, University of Chicago, University of Toronto, Nikhef Amsterdam, and Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics.

Signatories also include directors of major research institutions, such as Rajesh Gopakumar of ICTS, Sandip Trivedi of TIFR, and Atish Dabholkar of International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Italy.

Here is the full text of the statement:

We are a group of Indian scientists and scholars.

We are issuing this statement in our personal capacity as concerned citizens to express our dismay at the reported plans to table the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019 in the parliament. We do not have access to the exact text of the current version of the Bill. Our statement is based on media reports and the text of the previous version of the Bill that was passed by the Lok Sabha in January 2019. Nevertheless, we feel compelled to issue this statement already at this point of time in view of the reports that the Bill may be tabled in parliament early next week and may be taken up for voting in both houses soon after.

We understand that the Bill seeks to grant citizenship to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan. The stated intent of the Bill is to provide refuge to persecuted minorities from neighbouring countries. While we support this laudable objective, we find it deeply troubling that the Bill uses religion as a legal criterion for determining Indian citizenship.

The idea of India that emerged from the independence movement, and as enshrined in our constitution, is that of a country that aspires to treat people of all faiths equally. The use of religion as a criterion for citizenship in the proposed bill would mark a radical break with this history and would be inconsistent with the basic structure of the constitution. We fear, in particular, that the careful exclusion of Muslims from the ambit of the Bill will greatly strain the pluralistic fabric of the country.

We note that article 14 of the Indian constitution prohibits the State from denying “to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.” While it is the job of legal experts to determine whether this draft bill violates the letter of the constitution, it seems certain to us that it violates its spirit.

For the reasons mentioned above, we call for the immediate withdrawal of this bill and as its replacement request for appropriate legislation that will address the concerns of refugees and minorities in a non-discriminatory manner.

(The institutional affiliations provided here are only for the purpose of identification and do not indicate the official positions of these organizations.)

Also read: Why Modi govt’s NRC will be an even bigger blunder than demonetisation


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism



  1. Scietists will recommend a subject matter that Tom and Dick will not listen to becameuse they do not think they need recomendations.

  2. Dear so called Scientists ! U object Govt uses religion as a criterion to determine citizenship.Is it only for citizenship ? WHY U DID NOT OBJECT GOVT USING RELIGION FOR PILGRIMAGE,TEACHING RELIGION,SCHOLARSHIPS, SALARIES,MOSQUE+CHURCH BUILDING GRANDS ETC ETC USING RELIGION ?? Are u having any sense of shame to protest an unreasonable cause !!

  3. I never knew we had so many geniuses!! Plz vote Modi Government out. That is the only solution. If you can. Modi and Shah are moving their agendas — right or wrong — democratically. Any problem? You Congis and Leftists. Go away you fakes. You never opened your mouth in many other important issues before.

  4. Either These Scientists are not updated with Facts OR Fake Scientiests !
    Yes, minorities are persecuted in Islamic states which are created religiously in 1947 for Muslims… but so called Minorities in Hindustan are Appeased & they are thriving with demographic changes..

  5. This is something should have been done earlier by Nehru himself. It’s true that it can make religion as criterion, but one has to accept the realities as well. These minorities are persecuted on neighboring countries because of their faith, and it all goes back to the partition. Many European countries for instance Germany allows Germans who settled in Russia more than 100 years ago to come back and settle again in Germany. So why not India can do so. Of course, leaving Muslims out of this bill seems cruel but these countries were also created for Muslims primarily, so we can not say that all Muslims can also come back to India. Those Muslims who chose to live in India are Indians.

Comments are closed.