The four men convicted for the 16 December 2012 Delhi gangrape | Image: Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint
The four convicts who were hanged Friday morning | Image ThePrint
Text Size:

New Delhi: Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar (31) — the four convicted in the Delhi gangrape case — were hanged early Friday morning, seven years after the crime and more than two months since the original date of their death warrant.

Sandeep Goel, DGP (Prison), confirmed that all four were hanged at 5:30am.

This is the first time that four convicts were hanged together on the same platform.

The execution caps months of attempts by the convicts to first commute the death penalty to a life sentence and then delay the execution.

From review petitions, mercy petitions and pleas challenging unfavourable verdicts, the four men chased down every possible judicial avenue, including appeals in the International Court of Justice.

On Thursday, the Patiala House court rejected their plea seeking a stay on the hanging.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

A.P. Singh, the counsel of the convicts, argued that there were cases pending trial against the convicts in other courts, but the argument was dismissed.


Also read: Day before 2012 gangrape convicts’ hanging, disbelief and despair at their Ravidas Camp homes


Last-minute attempts

In a pre-dawn hearing, barely three hours before the execution, the Supreme Court dismissed a plea by Pawan Gupta against the rejection of his second mercy plea by President Ram Nath Kovind.

Gupta argued that his mercy plea had been wrongly rejected without considering the fact that he was a minor at the time of offence in 2012.

The top court was hearing the petition hours after the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea filed by lawyer A.P. Singh on behalf of three of the convicts challenging the trial court order declining to stay their execution.

In a late Thursday night hearing, the court dismissed the plea saying it was devoid of merits.

Singh had moved two petitions late Thursday night in a last-ditch attempt — one on behalf of Gupta challenging the rejection of his mercy plea, and the second challenging the Patiala House Court’s order not to stay the execution.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court had rejected a plea by Akshay Kumar challenging the dismissal of his second mercy petition by the President.

Another plea by Mukesh Kumar Singh, who had challenged a Delhi High Court order claiming that he was not present in the city on the day of the crime, was also rejected by the Supreme Court.


Also read: Night before hanging, 16 December rapists ‘crying bitterly’, counsellors read Gita to them


Delayed execution

The combined execution of the four men was delayed three times since 22 January, when the original order was issued.

According to the prison manual, if a death sentence has been given to more than one person in the same case, and if an appeal or an application is made by any one, then the execution of the sentence shall be postponed for all.

With each convict filing different petitions at different points in time, the execution was pushed back until all pending cases were concluded.

The first batch of review petitions and curative petitions, dismissed by the Supreme Court, were filed together. However, the curative petitions and mercy petition were filed separately by all four at a gap of weeks.

Sharma and Singh were the first to file their mercy and curative petitions. This led to the first delay in January.

Then Kumar filed his curative petition while Gupta filed his mercy plea, leading to the execution date being pushed again in February.


Also read: ‘Rarest of rare’ — history of death penalty in India and crimes that call for hanging


The case

On the night of 16 December 2012, a 23-year-old physiotherapy intern was gang raped and brutally assaulted in a moving bus in South Delhi. She died a fortnight later in Singapore, where she had been taken to treat her critical injuries.

Six people were arrested for the crime, including a 17-year-old who was tried and convicted under the Juvenile Justice Act. The teen was sentenced to three years in a reform home, and has since been released. He is reportedly serving as a cook somewhere in South India.

Ram Singh, a 33-year-old bus driver, was the other accused in the case but he allegedly committed suicide in Tihar jail days after the trial began.

At the time, the crime had dominated national headlines and triggered an outpouring of public anger over the issue of women’s safety.


Also read: Gym instructor, fruitseller, bus driver — the 6 men convicted in Nirbhaya gangrape-murder


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

2 Comments Share Your Views

2 COMMENTS

  1. Edit by author:

    Indian court deny justice by not entertaining curative pleas. Jevueniles tried as adult. Court took life instead of life imprisonment what kind of world we live in.

    Convicts died without biryanis but in solace of watching Bollywood movies.

  2. Justice is served.

    Our Judicial System works. It has shown that the basic premise on which it is enshrined is correct, fair, and unrelenting.

    No man or woman will be punished untill it is proved beyond all shred of doubt that they are guilty. All the steps that are enshrined in the process are necessary. Lest we condemn an inocent by mistake.

    To those that talk of delay I say this – Justice’s eyes are blind. She needs time to be sure. And only she can decide. Not you or I.

    It is better that a 1000 guilty go unpunished than 1 inocent is punished.

    I love my India.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here