scorecardresearch
Monday, August 4, 2025
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaAccused in narcotics case should not be granted bail unless reasonable grounds...

Accused in narcotics case should not be granted bail unless reasonable grounds that he is not guilty: SC

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi, Mar 28 (PTI) An accused in a narcotics case involving trade in commercial quantity should not be released on bail unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds that the person is not guilty and not likely to commit a crime while on bail, the Supreme Court has said.

A bench of Justices V Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal made the observation while setting aside an order of the Allahabad High Court, which had released on bail a man accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

“It is implicit that no person accused of an offence involving trade in commercial quantity of narcotics is liable to be released on bail unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such an offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail,” the bench said.

The top court said the quantity of “ganja” recovered from the accused is of commercial quantity and the high court has not recorded any finding that he is not prima facie guilty of the offence alleged and that he is not likely to commit the same offence when enlarged on bail.

“In the absence of recording of such satisfaction by the court, we are of the opinion that the high court manifestly erred in enlarging the respondent-accused on bail,” it said.

The apex court said the grant of bail to two other accused in the case — the driver and his helper who were caught by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence with over 3,971 kg of ganja in a truck in Varanasi — does not seem to be a good and sufficient reason for granting bail to this man.

“The above two accused are not the main accused, but the vicarious agents of the respondent-accused, who is the main person in drug trafficking and was involved in the above illegal transactions. The role of the respondent-accused is clearly different from that of the driver and the helper, the other two co-accused,” the bench said.

The driver had revealed that the respondent-accused indulged in illicit trade of ganja. PTI PKS ABH ABH

This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

  • Tags

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular