Actors Tabu and Ishaan Khatter in a still from the BBC series 'A Suitable Boy' | Twitter | @BBC
Text Size:

New Delhi: The first episode of A Suitable Boy, a six-part series directed by Mira Nair, dropped on BBC One in the UK Sunday to an average live audience of 4.6 million. And even though it will only be available in India later in the year on Netflix, it is all anyone can talk about.

From frantically reading and revising Vikram Seth’s doorstopper of a novel, on which the show is based, to poring over reviews of the first episode, India cannot wait to see itself on screen.

For that, really, is what Seth’s sweeping 1993 classic is — an exploration of India.

Set in 1951-52, the book follows the story of four families, held together by one Mrs Rupa Mehra’s burning desire to find a worthy match for her younger daughter Lata. But it’s more than a family drama. It tells the story of a newly independent India, struggling to find its feet and stay on them, an India preparing for its first general election in the wake of freedom that came at the cost of a bloody Partition, and an India that is grappling with the ugliness of religious conflict.

At more than 1,300 pages in its original edition (later editions have gone to upwards of 1,500 pages), Seth’s novel is a massive tome, and a difficult book to adapt for the screen.

Director Nair and screenwriter Andrew Davies (who has earlier adapted Pride and Prejudice, Vanity Fair and Middlemarch among others into BBC drama serials) had their hands full, given the book is one of the longest ever written in the English language.

In fact, one of the criticisms the show has garnered after the first episode is that it feels too crunched, like a highlights reel, and that six episodes will not do it justice.

Still, many have praised the show’s production values. And of course, there is the fact that this is the first period drama in the history of the BBC to feature a cast entirely consisting of people of colour — Tanya Maniktala, Mahira Kakkar, Tabu, Shahana Goswami, Ishaan Khatter, Rasika Dugal, Ram Kapoor, to name a few.


Also read: Mira Nair to adapt New York Times story ‘The Jungle Prince of Delhi’ into Amazon series


Visually stunning but clunky dialogue and overly desi accents undo the magic

Here’s a look at what the reactions to the show have been so far:

The Guardian’s Chitra Ramaswamy said, “The production values are high, the performances poised and the locations stunning, from the dusty markets of Calcutta to the fictional university town of Brahmpur. But… It deserved at least 12 episodes. After all, Seth’s sprawling and deeply humane novel is one of the longest books in English.”

While its visual appeal and casting are remarkable, she notes the show feels “uncomfortably old-school”.

Anita Singh, the Entertainment Editor for the Telegraph, wrote, “Andrew Davies has stripped away all the fat from Vikram Seth’s enormous novel and left us with a gorgeous TV drama,” while according to The Independent’s Ed Cumming, “In depicting the dangers of Hindu nationalism, the programme also nods towards modern Indian politics. It’s refreshing to see Indian period drama grounded in a least a semblance of political reality.”

Yet he minced no words for the parts in “unforgivably flat dialogue” and added, “For all its good intentions, this is still an orange-filtered fantasy version of India, where the characters speak English with the same mannered Indian accents and nobody can do anything without a sitar twanging.”

The accents have, in fact, come under criticism from most quarters, including from Raja Sen (one of the few Indian critics to have watched the episode) , who wrote in Mint Lounge: “Here we have a cast of mostly talented Indian actors trying, bafflingly, to sound browner. The cadences are unforgivable as characters try to add weird Hindi-esque lilts to English sentences. In this day and age, for Indian actors to take a Peter Sellers approach for an adaptation of an Indian masterpiece is utterly confounding.”

He also criticised the show’s lack of flow, and while he praised some of the actors, in particular Khatter, Goswami and Kakkar, he called it a “feeble adaptation” that was “soap-operatic” and “tedious”.

On Twitter, opinions have been flowing freely since the episode began to air, and run the gamut from beautiful to painfully dull.

https://twitter.com/asjadnazir/status/1287491695613968397?s=20


Also read: Armed with much-loved Pakistani shows, Zindagi channel to return 27 July on ZEE5


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here