On his 89th birth anniversary, ThePrint takes a look at the life of Goldie Anand who made his most memorable films under the banner of his brother Dev Anand.
On his 17th death anniversary, ThePrint recalls the life of Makhan Singh who lost his limb in an unfortunate accident after representing India at the highest level.
Indian govt officials last month skipped Turkish National Day celebrations in Delhi, in a message to Ankara following its support for Islamabad, particularly during Operation Sindoor.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
Imagine being in Mr.Bal Thackeray’s position. In a hell of a marginalization, that when existed during the democratic rule for long where no government assistance for the sufferers and when the sufferers were instead boiled to vapour (uncared and unrecorded by media and people). One has to be able to define who is violent, for what and what does it mean to be “bad for the bad”. Our Indians were and are so great that even when tears are saturated, peace and non-militant behaviour is unrealized as derogatory of living. Most were, are and possible, will be sensitised about the sort of a fear and intimidation that was a significant counter point for most during his rising times but who are fearing, intimidated and why? Why can’t one think of it. There are numerous examples of why he was a simple matter of talk but was a huge deal because natural instinct of humans is to complicate the simple to a degree such that still none realise it’s better to go back to square 1 and listen to what he always said in his interviews, speeches and etc. The ones who he inherently opposed were instead asked to unite or either stay away from their uncontrollably cruel actions (we sure know who they actually are) because limits nearly broke away from the streamline where nonaboriginal domination was reaching beyond peaks and further irresistible treatment of the aboriginals was flourishing, but he neither said nor did oppose all of a particular community. Fighting for truth is against law and order, humanity and is completely unproductive? If so, with peace, handful things came true and peaceful approach would not have excelled when the opponents were in no way that kind peaceful and serene, going to listen and a treaty would have failed, rather killed the peaceful approach believers. Hope one tries to understand one of his decisions and actions to truly know why he was a simple matter of talk yet made a big deal and horribly misunderstood by the help of LTTE’s start and end (To hint more of why a severe action is required which our law and order, the great democratic governance and people could never attain except in words and theories).
Imagine being in Mr.Bal Thackeray’s position. In a hell of a marginalization, that when existed during the democratic rule for long where no government assistance for the sufferers and when the sufferers were instead boiled to vapour (uncared and unrecorded by media and people). One has to be able to define who is violent, for what and what does it mean to be “bad for the bad”. Our Indians were and are so great that even when tears are saturated, peace and non-militant behaviour is unrealized as derogatory of living. Most were, are and possible, will be sensitised about the sort of a fear and intimidation that was a significant counter point for most during his rising times but who are fearing, intimidated and why? Why can’t one think of it. There are numerous examples of why he was a simple matter of talk but was a huge deal because natural instinct of humans is to complicate the simple to a degree such that still none realise it’s better to go back to square 1 and listen to what he always said in his interviews, speeches and etc. The ones who he inherently opposed were instead asked to unite or either stay away from their uncontrollably cruel actions (we sure know who they actually are) because limits nearly broke away from the streamline where nonaboriginal domination was reaching beyond peaks and further irresistible treatment of the aboriginals was flourishing, but he neither said nor did oppose all of a particular community. Fighting for truth is against law and order, humanity and is completely unproductive? If so, with peace, handful things came true and peaceful approach would not have excelled when the opponents were in no way that kind peaceful and serene, going to listen and a treaty would have failed, rather killed the peaceful approach believers. Hope one tries to understand one of his decisions and actions to truly know why he was a simple matter of talk yet made a big deal and horribly misunderstood by the help of LTTE’s start and end (To hint more of why a severe action is required which our law and order, the great democratic governance and people could never attain except in words and theories).