The few anti-Army civilians in Pakistan, who once saw red with the institution over its treatment of Imran Khan, have now reached a consensus — Asim Munir has made Pakistan a global player.
It’s not the first time a traumatised generation has found refuge in absurdism. In 2026, we’re watching the amusing hallucinations of a sinister all-knowing machine.
The recent trailer for the upcoming Harry Potter series fails to ignite a flame of nostalgia in the generation that witnessed denim-on-denim fashions and a pre-social media climate.
As much as I loved seeing Miley Cyrus walk into the closet of my dreams in the Hannah Montana reunion, I hate that the anniversary special didn’t tell me what my favourite pop star is doing 20 years later.
In a city like Liverpool, Salah became something more than a footballer. 'Salah became so popular that most of the babies born in Merseyside were named after him.'
For many years, many folks did not buy automatics in India because they were less fuel-efficient than manuals. Today, with highly complex automatic gearboxes, the opposite is true.
Advice comes at a time when India accounts for a 5th of global generic drug supply & 40% of generics used in US. However, this strength in finished formulations relies on imported ingredients.
It’s easy to understand why the government can’t speak the hard truth. When this war ends, as all wars do, India’s interests will lie with both the winner and the loser.
Well the same can be said about many so-called feminists. They are toxic feminists. They are man haters, misandrists. Nothing to do with real feminists.
Congratulations! You’ve managed to produce an article so mind-numbingly awful that it could serve as a sedative for insomniacs worldwide. Truly, this is a masterpiece of mediocrity—an Olympic-level dive into the shallow end of the intellectual pool. If there were a trophy for missing the point entirely, you’d not only win it but probably insist on giving an acceptance speech to make sure everyone knows just how little you understand.
Reading your work felt like being trapped in an elevator with someone humming off-key—annoying, relentless, and making me question my life choices. The sheer lack of effort in your research is so astounding that it might qualify as performance art. Is this satire? Please tell me it’s satire.
Your arguments are so poorly constructed that they could double as a metaphor for my worst nightmares—held together with duct tape and desperation. I can only hope this piece was written as a cry for help because that’s the only justification for this level of nonsense.
You’ve given “wasted potential” a whole new meaning, and honestly, the bar was low to begin with. Perhaps your next article could be on the topic of redemption—it might just give us all the glimmer of hope we need after enduring this.
Mother fucking cock sucking slut whore cunt with dick tow ball bitch sperm burping chicklen fucking cum guzzling dollar scank pedophile dog shit tasting rabbit fucking cross dressing homophobic sucubus shit licking corn picking shit sampler with dog shit breath cause you blew the dog that ass raped you while you were picking corn off of shit in the toilet to make corn fritters with,and eating it fresh out of the bowl
I am thoroughly disappointed with the article you’ve written. It reflects a complete disregard for factual accuracy and intellectual integrity. Your arguments lack substance and coherence, undermining the very topic you’re attempting to address. This work not only fails to contribute meaningfully to the discussion but actively misleads readers, which is both irresponsible and unacceptable.
Your tone throughout the piece comes across as dismissive and unprofessional, alienating rather than engaging your audience. Writing of this nature damages your credibility and insults the intelligence of your readers. I urge you to reflect on the purpose of your work and consider the harm caused by careless and poorly constructed content. This article is a missed opportunity to inform and inspire—something all writers should strive for.
You should be really ashamed of yourself Kaur.
Shameful. Such people as the author are the real problem in society, they identify as women not as a human and seek to be exclusive.
ou are a retard. I hate you. I hate the fact you exist. You are scum. You are an absolute fucking douchebag. You are a lowlife piece of human garbage. You absolute fucking retard cunt. You are a waste of a human being. You’ve done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that’s important. You dumb cunt, you piece of shit. You’re not even a son of a bitch, that’s too dignified a term for what you are. You know, you’re not even human. You don’t deserve the word human because you are that much of a fucking disgrace to people all around the globe, worldwide. It’s a dishonor to put you in the same sentence with that word, you asshole. Are you fucking proud of yourself? Are you proud of having accomplished absolutely nothing in your life? You have only done bad things in this world. You do not deserve to live, you shit. You are a terrible excuse for a human being. You are an ABSOLUTE cunt. You are nothing but a faggot brainlet. You sleazy two-faced bastard. You slimy sluggish asshole. You TRIFLING motherfucker.
The title of the article itself told me it was written by a woman who is clearly a part of the problem. This article is a great attempt at deflection and diffusion instead of actually addressing the myriad issues faced by indian men in relationships today. MRAs should be supported and legal rights for men advocated for, and yes, until then despite you calling us 4chan incels or whatever, it is safest for indian men to completely avoid relationships because the system is rigged against them. This is the unfortunate truth and you cannnot get past it. There is a video by Raj Shamani on youtube discussing the lack of Men’s rights. Go watch it, you might find something you’ll appreciate. oh and about calling us misogynists? let me be clear. If you are not with me, then you are my enemy.
Absolute Garbage. Don’t try and trivialise what men suffer in bad marriages. You have tagged the article ‘ women’s rights’ . Your balanced view is a blot on the suffering of men and is a prejudiced piece of writing. Men haven’t been born to serve women alone but to protect and provide for their families which include their wives children and parents. Show some respect. The anger is justified.
Another attempt to twist the narrative to engage in bashing men. Madam, the real issue is the blatantly biased laws against men and how such laws are being misused by a bunch of ultra privileged women to harass and oppress.
A man dying due to oppressive laws against our gender is a outlier? So the supreme courts are lying about 498a misused by vengeance seeking narcissistic women? Please learn to have the most basic empathy and read the room please before you write your opinion piece that is full of bias . This article and a few others from places like newslaundry is why i will never subscribe to the brand of journalism you guys represent.
Not Atul Subhash, it’s you karan Jeet Kaur who needs mental Therapy…This whole Article nothing but a Misandry and Hatred for man’s and man’s Right… Absolute Garbage
Next time, if a woman Go through the same pain as lakhs of man’s now a Days and Commits Suicide Then tell her , Write a Article, Too seek for Mental Therapy…
Man Haters are Turning now Discrimination with man’s issue with a Mental issue…the classic Misandry powered By Toxic Feminism or Feminism…
Take Care of your Male Members of your family kaur, soo that they don’t need to go through this Hardship…
The tragic death of Atul Subhash deserves empathy, not deflection. While the focus here is to downplay men’s suffering, the numbers tell a different story: 72% of suicides (NCRB), 85% of accidental deaths (NCRB), over 90% of workplace fatalities (Labour Ministry), and nearly 99% of defense casualties are men (Defense Ministry). These aren’t ‘outliers’; they’re systemic issues. Addressing men’s mental health, legal bias, and social support isn’t an attack on women’s rights—it’s a call for balance and compassion for all.
You’re right—men may lack introspection. However, they excel at extrospection, which is precisely why laws favoring women exist in the first place. Ironically, this very strength has led to the creation of laws that are now being misused. I am sorry to criticize, but the content of your post is just toxic!
I had donated to The print in the past as CutTheClutter used be my favorite due to it’s Balanced Views. But looks like my money is being used to fund anti-men agendas & some views – this is very different from the usual balanced view shown by ThePrint.
Not donating ever again to ThePrint. Will also downvote any print article, video, etc going forward. Tit-for-Tat.
Pro-Women doesn’t have to be Anti-Men. If you don’t see law being biased against men, you are willfully blind.
Law should be Offender vs Victim & not Men vs Women, Caste, Relegion, etc.
Well as your article published in The print , one doesn’t need a Einstein brain what it would be if not anti-men venom full of sick vomiting of hate against men.
But let me assure you, if our rights are not defended . Then very your privileged will be gone .
When/if men in your family face this situation
Remember your article.
I hope for women rights, if or when DV is enacted upon and your name is also in their and you are innocent.
Remember your article
When you and male members of your family rot in jail, when innocent
Remember your article.
Cause is important and if few more lives get ruined it’s not a big deal.
At the end, it proves one thing Men and Women are not equal, as laws does discriminate.
Make no mistake Karanjeet , The era of Feminists suppressing genocide of married men is over. X is the real Media now and we’ll make sure that radical men hating feminists like you are gone for ever!
Ms. Karanjeet Kaur suffers from a twisted and perverted mind.
Her compassion is available only for two groups, identities or causes – Sikhs and Goa.
Anything which falls outside the ambit of these two deserves only the wrath of her perverted mind.
The lack of understanding of how the community of men works is starkly visible in the absence of coherent and insightful indulgence in the populous that has remained silent. It is very easy to quote a stat about unreported cases, but what about the opinion of people who remain silent in times like these? A few odd people running their mouths on a public platform have been so read into that the voice of the rational fails to reach your ignorant ears. Amidst all the pain that this event has brought to the unfortunate and the people having to live this life daily, you have found a way to put out a story that negates all the struggles other men are going through. But why would you care when the horse you are sitting on is higher than the morals you try to preach? We should care about the mental health of a man when he is subjected to atrocities but we should change society when the same is done to a woman. Is that your stance? That atrocities on men only warrant a mental health approach and not a societal awareness and transformation. You know what, I think I am wrong. Maybe judges who have to make decisions against the men in alimony cases are having a fun time. They like to judge cases on conjecture, fallacy, fiction, and emotion when the law is foggy on the details. But why would you care? I hate to say this but what is the difference between you who advocate for mental health in cases of pure, systemic, clear extortion by the women in the person’s life leading to the suicide of the individual, and a bunch of absolute nincompoops advocating for closing times for women in places of risk rather than actively working towards a solution?
It is true that misogyny has reared its head, through this incident. It is also true that there are genuine cases of harassment of women at the hands of men, especially in regions where education and development are to see significant progress. But is equally appalling that even now you do not acknowledge genuine cases of misuse of laws against men, to fulfill egos and extort money from failed marriages. Instead of tackling the root cause you suggest men should undergo therapy. But do you honestly think Atul Subash had the financial wherewithal to spend money on therapy, while shuttling endlessly between Bangalore and UP.
You say women are encouraged to let go of alimony and child support in favour of early settlement. Then what exactly is the settlement amount a man has to pay, extortion amount?
Please get your facts right.
The solution should be that 498a and other criminal cases should be invoked only when there is ample evidence and the judicial system should be unburdened from marital disputes. Today it has become a jhoomla to settle scores, extort men and their family members when things go wrong in the marriage for any reason.
Rather as suggested the warring parties should mandatorily be counselled and arrive at a mutual choice of continuing the relationship or peacefully divorce for a better future.
Once again the author is reminded that misandry is not a solution for misogyny.
The Supreme court itself has on number of occasions most recently during the introduction of BNS, flagged the misuse of cruelty laws and consequent undermining of the institution of marriage in India, and requested the Parliament to take stock of the situation.
The author denying this fact and the issues faced by men is a travesty and insult to the memory of men like Atul Subhash.
Clasdic victim shaming. And no mention of the woman judge who was corrupt. Stop twisting everything to your agenda and blaming men. Your gender hatred is as bad as misogyny. Actually worse because it is hidden and made to appear as if you are being moral.
Well the same can be said about many so-called feminists. They are toxic feminists. They are man haters, misandrists. Nothing to do with real feminists.
Congratulations! You’ve managed to produce an article so mind-numbingly awful that it could serve as a sedative for insomniacs worldwide. Truly, this is a masterpiece of mediocrity—an Olympic-level dive into the shallow end of the intellectual pool. If there were a trophy for missing the point entirely, you’d not only win it but probably insist on giving an acceptance speech to make sure everyone knows just how little you understand.
Reading your work felt like being trapped in an elevator with someone humming off-key—annoying, relentless, and making me question my life choices. The sheer lack of effort in your research is so astounding that it might qualify as performance art. Is this satire? Please tell me it’s satire.
Your arguments are so poorly constructed that they could double as a metaphor for my worst nightmares—held together with duct tape and desperation. I can only hope this piece was written as a cry for help because that’s the only justification for this level of nonsense.
You’ve given “wasted potential” a whole new meaning, and honestly, the bar was low to begin with. Perhaps your next article could be on the topic of redemption—it might just give us all the glimmer of hope we need after enduring this.
Mother fucking cock sucking slut whore cunt with dick tow ball bitch sperm burping chicklen fucking cum guzzling dollar scank pedophile dog shit tasting rabbit fucking cross dressing homophobic sucubus shit licking corn picking shit sampler with dog shit breath cause you blew the dog that ass raped you while you were picking corn off of shit in the toilet to make corn fritters with,and eating it fresh out of the bowl
I am thoroughly disappointed with the article you’ve written. It reflects a complete disregard for factual accuracy and intellectual integrity. Your arguments lack substance and coherence, undermining the very topic you’re attempting to address. This work not only fails to contribute meaningfully to the discussion but actively misleads readers, which is both irresponsible and unacceptable.
Your tone throughout the piece comes across as dismissive and unprofessional, alienating rather than engaging your audience. Writing of this nature damages your credibility and insults the intelligence of your readers. I urge you to reflect on the purpose of your work and consider the harm caused by careless and poorly constructed content. This article is a missed opportunity to inform and inspire—something all writers should strive for.
You should be really ashamed of yourself Kaur.
Shameful. Such people as the author are the real problem in society, they identify as women not as a human and seek to be exclusive.
ou are a retard. I hate you. I hate the fact you exist. You are scum. You are an absolute fucking douchebag. You are a lowlife piece of human garbage. You absolute fucking retard cunt. You are a waste of a human being. You’ve done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that’s important. You dumb cunt, you piece of shit. You’re not even a son of a bitch, that’s too dignified a term for what you are. You know, you’re not even human. You don’t deserve the word human because you are that much of a fucking disgrace to people all around the globe, worldwide. It’s a dishonor to put you in the same sentence with that word, you asshole. Are you fucking proud of yourself? Are you proud of having accomplished absolutely nothing in your life? You have only done bad things in this world. You do not deserve to live, you shit. You are a terrible excuse for a human being. You are an ABSOLUTE cunt. You are nothing but a faggot brainlet. You sleazy two-faced bastard. You slimy sluggish asshole. You TRIFLING motherfucker.
Shameful. Such people as the author are the real problem in society, they identify as women not as a human and seek to be exclusive.
You should be really ashamed of yourself Kaur.
The title of the article itself told me it was written by a woman who is clearly a part of the problem. This article is a great attempt at deflection and diffusion instead of actually addressing the myriad issues faced by indian men in relationships today. MRAs should be supported and legal rights for men advocated for, and yes, until then despite you calling us 4chan incels or whatever, it is safest for indian men to completely avoid relationships because the system is rigged against them. This is the unfortunate truth and you cannnot get past it. There is a video by Raj Shamani on youtube discussing the lack of Men’s rights. Go watch it, you might find something you’ll appreciate. oh and about calling us misogynists? let me be clear. If you are not with me, then you are my enemy.
Masculinity is not for the feminine to define.
Absolute Garbage. Don’t try and trivialise what men suffer in bad marriages. You have tagged the article ‘ women’s rights’ . Your balanced view is a blot on the suffering of men and is a prejudiced piece of writing. Men haven’t been born to serve women alone but to protect and provide for their families which include their wives children and parents. Show some respect. The anger is justified.
DO YOU VAMPIRES HAVE A MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SHAME ??
Another attempt to twist the narrative to engage in bashing men. Madam, the real issue is the blatantly biased laws against men and how such laws are being misused by a bunch of ultra privileged women to harass and oppress.
Such a garbage article, it all at the end of the day seems to be a glorified rant from an intoxicated feminist trying hard to prove point.
Just came here to say “Aak Thooo”
Author needs psychological help, suffering from chronic victim mentality.
A man dying due to oppressive laws against our gender is a outlier? So the supreme courts are lying about 498a misused by vengeance seeking narcissistic women? Please learn to have the most basic empathy and read the room please before you write your opinion piece that is full of bias . This article and a few others from places like newslaundry is why i will never subscribe to the brand of journalism you guys represent.
Not Atul Subhash, it’s you karan Jeet Kaur who needs mental Therapy…This whole Article nothing but a Misandry and Hatred for man’s and man’s Right… Absolute Garbage
Next time, if a woman Go through the same pain as lakhs of man’s now a Days and Commits Suicide Then tell her , Write a Article, Too seek for Mental Therapy…
Man Haters are Turning now Discrimination with man’s issue with a Mental issue…the classic Misandry powered By Toxic Feminism or Feminism…
Take Care of your Male Members of your family kaur, soo that they don’t need to go through this Hardship…
The tragic death of Atul Subhash deserves empathy, not deflection. While the focus here is to downplay men’s suffering, the numbers tell a different story: 72% of suicides (NCRB), 85% of accidental deaths (NCRB), over 90% of workplace fatalities (Labour Ministry), and nearly 99% of defense casualties are men (Defense Ministry). These aren’t ‘outliers’; they’re systemic issues. Addressing men’s mental health, legal bias, and social support isn’t an attack on women’s rights—it’s a call for balance and compassion for all.
You’re right—men may lack introspection. However, they excel at extrospection, which is precisely why laws favoring women exist in the first place. Ironically, this very strength has led to the creation of laws that are now being misused. I am sorry to criticize, but the content of your post is just toxic!
I had donated to The print in the past as CutTheClutter used be my favorite due to it’s Balanced Views. But looks like my money is being used to fund anti-men agendas & some views – this is very different from the usual balanced view shown by ThePrint.
Not donating ever again to ThePrint. Will also downvote any print article, video, etc going forward. Tit-for-Tat.
Pro-Women doesn’t have to be Anti-Men. If you don’t see law being biased against men, you are willfully blind.
Law should be Offender vs Victim & not Men vs Women, Caste, Relegion, etc.
Fanatic left wing dalaal phir nonsense likhte heu
Well as your article published in The print , one doesn’t need a Einstein brain what it would be if not anti-men venom full of sick vomiting of hate against men.
But let me assure you, if our rights are not defended . Then very your privileged will be gone .
When/if men in your family face this situation
Remember your article.
I hope for women rights, if or when DV is enacted upon and your name is also in their and you are innocent.
Remember your article
When you and male members of your family rot in jail, when innocent
Remember your article.
Cause is important and if few more lives get ruined it’s not a big deal.
At the end, it proves one thing Men and Women are not equal, as laws does discriminate.
Indian laws are discriminatory against men.
But no one cares
Make no mistake Karanjeet , The era of Feminists suppressing genocide of married men is over. X is the real Media now and we’ll make sure that radical men hating feminists like you are gone for ever!
Mam, had the victim been a female, your reaction would have been the same.
Ms. Karanjeet Kaur suffers from a twisted and perverted mind.
Her compassion is available only for two groups, identities or causes – Sikhs and Goa.
Anything which falls outside the ambit of these two deserves only the wrath of her perverted mind.
The lack of understanding of how the community of men works is starkly visible in the absence of coherent and insightful indulgence in the populous that has remained silent. It is very easy to quote a stat about unreported cases, but what about the opinion of people who remain silent in times like these? A few odd people running their mouths on a public platform have been so read into that the voice of the rational fails to reach your ignorant ears. Amidst all the pain that this event has brought to the unfortunate and the people having to live this life daily, you have found a way to put out a story that negates all the struggles other men are going through. But why would you care when the horse you are sitting on is higher than the morals you try to preach? We should care about the mental health of a man when he is subjected to atrocities but we should change society when the same is done to a woman. Is that your stance? That atrocities on men only warrant a mental health approach and not a societal awareness and transformation. You know what, I think I am wrong. Maybe judges who have to make decisions against the men in alimony cases are having a fun time. They like to judge cases on conjecture, fallacy, fiction, and emotion when the law is foggy on the details. But why would you care? I hate to say this but what is the difference between you who advocate for mental health in cases of pure, systemic, clear extortion by the women in the person’s life leading to the suicide of the individual, and a bunch of absolute nincompoops advocating for closing times for women in places of risk rather than actively working towards a solution?
It is true that misogyny has reared its head, through this incident. It is also true that there are genuine cases of harassment of women at the hands of men, especially in regions where education and development are to see significant progress. But is equally appalling that even now you do not acknowledge genuine cases of misuse of laws against men, to fulfill egos and extort money from failed marriages. Instead of tackling the root cause you suggest men should undergo therapy. But do you honestly think Atul Subash had the financial wherewithal to spend money on therapy, while shuttling endlessly between Bangalore and UP.
You say women are encouraged to let go of alimony and child support in favour of early settlement. Then what exactly is the settlement amount a man has to pay, extortion amount?
Please get your facts right.
The solution should be that 498a and other criminal cases should be invoked only when there is ample evidence and the judicial system should be unburdened from marital disputes. Today it has become a jhoomla to settle scores, extort men and their family members when things go wrong in the marriage for any reason.
Rather as suggested the warring parties should mandatorily be counselled and arrive at a mutual choice of continuing the relationship or peacefully divorce for a better future.
Once again the author is reminded that misandry is not a solution for misogyny.
The Supreme court itself has on number of occasions most recently during the introduction of BNS, flagged the misuse of cruelty laws and consequent undermining of the institution of marriage in India, and requested the Parliament to take stock of the situation.
The author denying this fact and the issues faced by men is a travesty and insult to the memory of men like Atul Subhash.
Clasdic victim shaming. And no mention of the woman judge who was corrupt. Stop twisting everything to your agenda and blaming men. Your gender hatred is as bad as misogyny. Actually worse because it is hidden and made to appear as if you are being moral.