And so it shall be if the distribution is closer than it is now. Hell, even in USA white suburbs become black gradually over 10-15 years as blacks rise in their economic power., move in to the all white neighborhood and Whites move out beyond being richer now. Worst case is this 51-49 demography. The present 86-14 is Sangi game having nothing else to do.
India is divided on religious line muslims vs others. Muslims got their share in Pakistan hence naturally they must not give any chance to divide India again.No place for muslim invaders in India
NRC like activity should immediately be stopped.India’s pluralism must be protected at any cost,in the name of NRC it is ethnic cleansing undertaken by the government.It may appear as a bold step taken by the government by the majority population but in the long run..can anyone smell Germany?
I do differ from the idea of the above writer scholar. We are to look ‘NRC’ in another practical way.
A guardian of a family should know the number of family members and should know details of their condition. Similarly each member should have scope to know the other members of his/her family. We are not in the society where father cannot say the number of their children and their physical status. We are not animals that the information of the members are not to be known.
In India, the existing elected Government is the guardian of the family of India. Whoever the party in governance is regarded as guardian/father. Government must have records of all of its members as ordinarily every guardian keep at present.
Someone may say, census counting is the information of family members for the government at present. But, is that correct and applicable for civilised guardian? Certainly not, because it does not have authenticity and completely verbal/hearsay. In India the Britishers introduced the present form of census for their business(mainly in Assam) and to increase their dominance in other parts of their country. The framers of our Construction were so far sighted that they Incorporated several provisions in the Constitution and enacted very important laws for the society in the period of 1950- 1960. The object of the parliamentary proceedings and enactment of the laws indicate the concept of modern guardian of welfare. Thus, better lately even, the concept of ‘NRC’ is very much correct and appropriate.
The process of preparation of NRC in Assam is on wrong footing. The ‘idea’ of some people in Assam was taken as gospel truth- the government (legislature, executive and specially judiciary) was also influenced by the created ‘idea’ of some politically influence parties. As a super authority, the Judiciary came in fire front by its some comments in musical orders and dig a pin by order of ‘NRC’ which was destructively implemented and the whole object, instead of unity it becomes divisive. The wrong way of implementation gave a strong weapon to the existing government. The party in power also took the opportunity and attempted to sit in governance. In the future the judiciary may also be blamed for ‘partiality’ to some group of people.
In spite of all the paranoia about the Muslim growth rates, the best available figures say that by 2050, India will still be 76% HIndu and 18% Muslim. That should lower blood pressures at Nagpur quite a bit.
And so it shall be if the distribution is closer than it is now. Hell, even in USA white suburbs become black gradually over 10-15 years as blacks rise in their economic power., move in to the all white neighborhood and Whites move out beyond being richer now. Worst case is this 51-49 demography. The present 86-14 is Sangi game having nothing else to do.
India is divided on religious line muslims vs others. Muslims got their share in Pakistan hence naturally they must not give any chance to divide India again.No place for muslim invaders in India
NRC like activity should immediately be stopped.India’s pluralism must be protected at any cost,in the name of NRC it is ethnic cleansing undertaken by the government.It may appear as a bold step taken by the government by the majority population but in the long run..can anyone smell Germany?
I do differ from the idea of the above writer scholar. We are to look ‘NRC’ in another practical way.
A guardian of a family should know the number of family members and should know details of their condition. Similarly each member should have scope to know the other members of his/her family. We are not in the society where father cannot say the number of their children and their physical status. We are not animals that the information of the members are not to be known.
In India, the existing elected Government is the guardian of the family of India. Whoever the party in governance is regarded as guardian/father. Government must have records of all of its members as ordinarily every guardian keep at present.
Someone may say, census counting is the information of family members for the government at present. But, is that correct and applicable for civilised guardian? Certainly not, because it does not have authenticity and completely verbal/hearsay. In India the Britishers introduced the present form of census for their business(mainly in Assam) and to increase their dominance in other parts of their country. The framers of our Construction were so far sighted that they Incorporated several provisions in the Constitution and enacted very important laws for the society in the period of 1950- 1960. The object of the parliamentary proceedings and enactment of the laws indicate the concept of modern guardian of welfare. Thus, better lately even, the concept of ‘NRC’ is very much correct and appropriate.
The process of preparation of NRC in Assam is on wrong footing. The ‘idea’ of some people in Assam was taken as gospel truth- the government (legislature, executive and specially judiciary) was also influenced by the created ‘idea’ of some politically influence parties. As a super authority, the Judiciary came in fire front by its some comments in musical orders and dig a pin by order of ‘NRC’ which was destructively implemented and the whole object, instead of unity it becomes divisive. The wrong way of implementation gave a strong weapon to the existing government. The party in power also took the opportunity and attempted to sit in governance. In the future the judiciary may also be blamed for ‘partiality’ to some group of people.
Today it is Muslims, tomorrow it will embolden them to pick and choose victims of their choice. This trend is dangerous and fraught with consequences.
What is wrong with this assertion, it has always been, the Muslim population use Arabic names, follow Arabic culture then their will be question mark.
In spite of all the paranoia about the Muslim growth rates, the best available figures say that by 2050, India will still be 76% HIndu and 18% Muslim. That should lower blood pressures at Nagpur quite a bit.