Lt Gen H S Panag PVSM, AVSM (R) served in the Indian Army for 40 years. He was GOC in C Northern Command and Central Command. Post retirement, he was Member of Armed Forces Tribunal.
The Defence Secretary’s silence / reticence / relative invisibility is as it should be. Uniformed officers could learn from it. What exactly is added to the nation’s knowledge when a service Chief says that we are fully prepared to respond to any challenge on our borders. In the age of television, it requires self control not to be seen strutting about.
what is wrong in what army chief says ? is this idiot panag wanting to save paksitans ass ? panag is NOW aam aadmi politician … he needs to be investigated over his unsolicited advice …
He is AAP supporter, and surprising he and Adm Ramadoss ( another aap-xian lobby stooge) are giving sermons on being apolitical.
He is AAP supporter, and surprising he and Adm Ramadoss ( another aap-xian lobby stooge) are giving sermons on being apolitical
He may very well be an AAP supporter, but the crucial difference is that he is not in service now. It’s the same advice he is giving here in m this article to leadership of the forces. The forces are there to protect the country, and not to promote interests of a particular political party.
What is wrong if the highest man in the service comments on security, how it becomes politics. Gen Rawat, Gen Chauhan comment on CAA protest was right. At the end it will be Army who will have to manage situation if by chance security worsens anywhere in our country. We cannot allow fifth column of jihadi-commie-x mafia axis to destroy our country, and hope that Army deployed at the border watches this out silently without realising the danger of it. It is like outflanking by enemy.
Paying some attention to Civics as a subject in the middle school would have helped in grasping the nature of Indian constitution and the defined role of the forces.
On the other hand if posting these kind of comments is your job description, then ofcourse you are free to even deny that night is followed by morning.
paying attention to gandh nehru nexus of jinnah appeasement leading to partition riots of 1947 will give u some sense that its the army that keeps the nation together or esle year fo congress govt has given insurgencies and separatism in kashmir and in north east which is completely christian by now …….kerala n bongal going the same way .,,.. learn from history unless you are a incestuous product of some cult bygone
Not sure of the grounds on which you allege that the decorated officer and author of this article is an AAP supporter. Even assuming he is one,, the crucial difference is that he is not in service now. It’s the same advice he is giving here in this article to the leadership of the forces – to remain apolitical. The forces are there to protect the country, and not to promote interests of a particular political party.
What is wrong if the highest man in the service comments on security, how it becomes politics. Gen Rawat, Gen Chauhan comment on CAA protest was right. At the end it will be Army who will have to manage situation if by chance security worsens anywhere in our country. We cannot allow fifth column of jihadi-commie-x mafia axis to destroy our country, and hope that Army deployed at the border watches this out silently without realising the danger of it. It is like outflanking by enemy.
Regarding him, he had joined AAP. To be fair his point looks ridiculous, imagined had Army chief commented on dangerous game in Punjab – 1970s by Congress, we would not have seen 1984 tragedy, same case during election rigging of 1987 JK.
Army has a say, otherwise it will be soldier who will pay with the blood as usual for this sickular (ohh secular ) nonsense.
Practice what you preach.
Write a letter to them if you have any worthy advice . Don’t go to press.
The Defence Secretary’s silence / reticence / relative invisibility is as it should be. Uniformed officers could learn from it. What exactly is added to the nation’s knowledge when a service Chief says that we are fully prepared to respond to any challenge on our borders. In the age of television, it requires self control not to be seen strutting about.
what is wrong in what army chief says ? is this idiot panag wanting to save paksitans ass ? panag is NOW aam aadmi politician … he needs to be investigated over his unsolicited advice …
He is AAP supporter, and surprising he and Adm Ramadoss ( another aap-xian lobby stooge) are giving sermons on being apolitical.
This person, in spite of, being a Congress stooge is sermonizing over how to remain apolitical in Army
He is AAP supporter, and surprising he and Adm Ramadoss ( another aap-xian lobby stooge) are giving sermons on being apolitical
He may very well be an AAP supporter, but the crucial difference is that he is not in service now. It’s the same advice he is giving here in m this article to leadership of the forces. The forces are there to protect the country, and not to promote interests of a particular political party.
What is wrong if the highest man in the service comments on security, how it becomes politics. Gen Rawat, Gen Chauhan comment on CAA protest was right. At the end it will be Army who will have to manage situation if by chance security worsens anywhere in our country. We cannot allow fifth column of jihadi-commie-x mafia axis to destroy our country, and hope that Army deployed at the border watches this out silently without realising the danger of it. It is like outflanking by enemy.
Paying some attention to Civics as a subject in the middle school would have helped in grasping the nature of Indian constitution and the defined role of the forces.
On the other hand if posting these kind of comments is your job description, then ofcourse you are free to even deny that night is followed by morning.
paying attention to gandh nehru nexus of jinnah appeasement leading to partition riots of 1947 will give u some sense that its the army that keeps the nation together or esle year fo congress govt has given insurgencies and separatism in kashmir and in north east which is completely christian by now …….kerala n bongal going the same way .,,.. learn from history unless you are a incestuous product of some cult bygone
Not sure of the grounds on which you allege that the decorated officer and author of this article is an AAP supporter. Even assuming he is one,, the crucial difference is that he is not in service now. It’s the same advice he is giving here in this article to the leadership of the forces – to remain apolitical. The forces are there to protect the country, and not to promote interests of a particular political party.
What is wrong if the highest man in the service comments on security, how it becomes politics. Gen Rawat, Gen Chauhan comment on CAA protest was right. At the end it will be Army who will have to manage situation if by chance security worsens anywhere in our country. We cannot allow fifth column of jihadi-commie-x mafia axis to destroy our country, and hope that Army deployed at the border watches this out silently without realising the danger of it. It is like outflanking by enemy.
Regarding him, he had joined AAP. To be fair his point looks ridiculous, imagined had Army chief commented on dangerous game in Punjab – 1970s by Congress, we would not have seen 1984 tragedy, same case during election rigging of 1987 JK.
Army has a say, otherwise it will be soldier who will pay with the blood as usual for this sickular (ohh secular ) nonsense.