The armed forces’ job is not to provide social justice but to pick people who can protect the nation! Many men are rejected for far lesser reson during SSB and women training standards are still far inferior to men yet they claim they r judged by male criteria!
So in the court, they went ahead stating women r equal to men in every way yet now they say women have biological difference and menstruation! Isn’t this what sane people has been saying? Why can’t women attain Shape 1 category fitness? Preganacy or menopause or menstruation r not valid excuses to be out of shape. 45 yrs is nothing; look at female actors or wrestlers or sports women and how they maintain fitness levels into their 50’s. So many female labourers do heavy work with babies tied to their backs without making any fuss! Why can’t these previleged ‘female warriors” make an effort to shape up?
This brings out the hollowness of their arguments. They want all the perks but cannot move a muscle to finish the responsibilities that comes with it.
Given the different anatomy and biological differences of male and female Bodies,
The medical standards also has to be different.
Given the requirement of the Army which is to safeguard the nation can not be compromised at any cost.Hence the age factor can not be overlooked.
On one hand women officers are asking to be treated equally under the Article 14 on the other they are asking for different set of parameters than their male counterparts. What a circus.
Army already has a very relaxed physical requirments for women. If they were equal virtually none of the women officers seeking PC would be qualified to join army let alone be rise to staff positions. If equal physical standards are retroactively implimented, most of these officers will have to leave army, lest they set a preccedent that having a different set of genitals is their biggest qualification and male officers are utter fools for having gone through back breaking training and maintaing physical standards for their entire career.
That being said, I am sure that the activist judiciary will come up an asinine judgement where “running” 5km in 2 hours will be considered as excellent timing. For equality off course.
Now this is odd, Military is not a place of equality in terms of physical aspects. I as a man might not be able to qualify as well because of my physical limits. And while we are talking about equality, why relaxation to women based on sex? Will they ask for same relaxation when women have to lead surgical strike or a company in war? Either you qualify the high standards or not! It is irrespective of sex
Sounds like a case of wanting cake and eating it too..
Either they conform to the rigors and physical demands of military service or they quit. Their pregnancy is not the responsibility of the Army that is paying them to fight wars not produce children.
It is incumbent on women in all fighting branches to recognize the singular truth and purpose of the military – to fight wars and kill our enemies.
Man, woman, transvestite doesnt matter. Fact is that the Army chose the for technical roles only, thats how they got in. Only new female recruits selected with the same standards as males should be allowed to get PC, not these old women.
I AM A WOMAN MYSELF.
The armed forces’ job is not to provide social justice but to pick people who can protect the nation! Many men are rejected for far lesser reson during SSB and women training standards are still far inferior to men yet they claim they r judged by male criteria!
So in the court, they went ahead stating women r equal to men in every way yet now they say women have biological difference and menstruation! Isn’t this what sane people has been saying? Why can’t women attain Shape 1 category fitness? Preganacy or menopause or menstruation r not valid excuses to be out of shape. 45 yrs is nothing; look at female actors or wrestlers or sports women and how they maintain fitness levels into their 50’s. So many female labourers do heavy work with babies tied to their backs without making any fuss! Why can’t these previleged ‘female warriors” make an effort to shape up?
This brings out the hollowness of their arguments. They want all the perks but cannot move a muscle to finish the responsibilities that comes with it.
Given the different anatomy and biological differences of male and female Bodies,
The medical standards also has to be different.
Given the requirement of the Army which is to safeguard the nation can not be compromised at any cost.Hence the age factor can not be overlooked.
On one hand women officers are asking to be treated equally under the Article 14 on the other they are asking for different set of parameters than their male counterparts. What a circus.
Army already has a very relaxed physical requirments for women. If they were equal virtually none of the women officers seeking PC would be qualified to join army let alone be rise to staff positions. If equal physical standards are retroactively implimented, most of these officers will have to leave army, lest they set a preccedent that having a different set of genitals is their biggest qualification and male officers are utter fools for having gone through back breaking training and maintaing physical standards for their entire career.
That being said, I am sure that the activist judiciary will come up an asinine judgement where “running” 5km in 2 hours will be considered as excellent timing. For equality off course.
Most of the lady officers in the Army want to be treated as “Lady” during duties and as “officer” for privileges.
Now this is odd, Military is not a place of equality in terms of physical aspects. I as a man might not be able to qualify as well because of my physical limits. And while we are talking about equality, why relaxation to women based on sex? Will they ask for same relaxation when women have to lead surgical strike or a company in war? Either you qualify the high standards or not! It is irrespective of sex
Sounds like a case of wanting cake and eating it too..
Either they conform to the rigors and physical demands of military service or they quit. Their pregnancy is not the responsibility of the Army that is paying them to fight wars not produce children.
It is incumbent on women in all fighting branches to recognize the singular truth and purpose of the military – to fight wars and kill our enemies.
Man, woman, transvestite doesnt matter. Fact is that the Army chose the for technical roles only, thats how they got in. Only new female recruits selected with the same standards as males should be allowed to get PC, not these old women.
Very true!