Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Punjab has already proved its nationalism. It proved it in 1947, when Partition tore through its body and it still stood with India. It proved it in 1965 and 1971, when Pakistan was not a dot on a map but an army at the door. It proved it through the Green Revolution, when a hungry nation needed food and Punjab’s farmers answered. It proves it still as Pakistan uses drones, narcotics and radicalisation to target Punjab first.
No state should have to keep proving loyalty after repeated sacrifices. Yet Punjab is routinely placed in the dock: its farmers blamed, its youth questioned, its fiscal stress mocked, its demands for equity dismissed as regionalism. That is not merely unfair. It is historically dishonest.
Punjab does need reforms. But it cannot reform its way out of burdens it did not choose, bit imposed and was never compensated for. What Punjab now requires is a Special Economic and Federal Reconstruction Package not charity, not appeasement, but the settlement of a national debt.
The numbers are stark. In 1970–71, Punjab’s per-capita income stood at 169% of the national average. By 2023–24, it had fallen to 106.7%. Haryana carved from Punjab in 1966 at 138.5% climbed to 176.8% over the same period. Punjab’s share of India’s GDP fell from 4.4% to 2.4%. Haryana’s GST collection is now four times Punjab’s. This is not a slowdown. It is a historic relative collapse.
The question is not whether Punjab made errors; it did. The real question is whether any other major Indian statehas carried this combination: Partition’s economic amputation, a permanently hostile western border, two wars on its soil, a food-security mandate that exhausted its groundwater, a terrorism decade, organised narcotics infiltration and unresolved federal grievances. None has.
Punjab has borne internal and external wars on its soil and its soul!
Before 1947, Punjab was India’s gateway to the northwest a commercial corridor stretching toward Central Asia. Partition severed it overnight. Markets vanished. Railways were cut. No compensation followed: no frontier package, no trade-replacement mechanism, no industrial shield. Punjab absorbed the shock and was asked to compete like any other state, which it no longer was. Then in 1966, a poorly designed reorganisation carved out Haryana and parts of Himachal Pradesh, leaving behind territorial disputes and river-water conflicts that fester to this day.
The first amputation was 1947. The second was 1966.
Punjab fed India and lost its water. Through guaranteed MSP, assured procurement and subsidised power, Union policy built the wheat-paddy system. Punjab grew what the system guaranteed it would buy. India achieved food sovereignty. The bill was charged to Punjab’s aquifers. Today Punjab’s groundwater extraction stands at 156% of annual recharge the highest in India against a national average of 61%. This is not agricultural mismanagement. It is the ecological cost of India’s food-security model. And yet, even as the nation ate Punjab’s wheat and rice, Punjab’s farmers were handed the blame for pollution. Groundwater restoration in Punjab is not a subsidy. It is repayment.
Union policy then pushed industry away. In 2003, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand received special industrial incentive packages. Industry followed: Baddi and Nalagarh rose while Ludhiana, Jalandhar and Mandi Gobindgarh competed against tax-subsidised neighbours. That was not market competition. It was policy-induced diversion.
Meanwhile, in 2021, the Union approved a ₹28,400 crore industrial development scheme for Jammu & Kashmir through 2037. J&K deserved that support.
But if hostile-border conditions justify special industrial treatment, why not Punjab? Punjab too is a hostile-border state. It too has suffered war, terrorism, trade closure and investor hesitation.
Yet it was treated as ordinary in economic policy while being treated as extraordinary in national obligation. That contradiction must end.
What Punjab must now demand is precise.
A 10-year income-tax holiday for new industrial units. A GST-linked investment incentive on the J&K model, with higher caps for border districts. A 30% capital subsidy statewide and 50% in border districts. Special emphasis and incentives for agro processing industry which can encourage alternative cropping pattern.
Interest subvention for new investment and MSMEs. Full stamp-duty refund for industrial land. Freight and logistics support to offset the closed western border. At least one major central PSU in defence, drones, agri-machinery or renewable energy anchored in the borderbelt.
And on the federal side: transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab with Union funding for Haryana’s new capital; Finance Commission reform to count frontier burden and ecological depletion; a National Groundwater Restoration Mission; and narcotics response treated as national security, not state policing.
This is not regionalism. It is not begging.
It is balancing of the federal balance sheet: Debit: Credit.
Punjab has proved its nationalism enough. Now India must prove its federalism.
Punjab has fed India, fought for India and guarded India. A Union that extracts continuously from a state and then blames that state for its exhaustion is not practising federalism. It is practising evasion. This demand may not be new, but the current Union values Nationalism. The party is trying to expand its base in Punjab. That is why the expectation; and this is the way.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.