Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Dear Mr Rahul Gandhi,
There was a time when constitutional office imposed discipline, restraint, and a minimum standard of gravitas.
That time, it would appear, has passed you by.
Your decision to publicly call the Prime Minister of India a “traitor” was not merely intemperate.
It was vulgar.
Not because Narendra Modi is beyond criticism—he is not.
Not because Prime Ministers are monarchs—they are not.
But because the office you currently occupy is not that of a street-corner heckler.
You are the Leader of the Opposition.
In mature parliamentary democracies, that title means something.
In Britain—the mother of parliamentary democracy—the Leader of the Opposition is often described, quite correctly, as the Shadow Prime Minister: the constitutional alternative government, expected to scrutinize, challenge, dismantle arguments, expose weaknesses, and prepare to govern.
Watch the House of Commons at its finest.
Savage? Certainly.
Merciless? Frequently.
But civilized.
Barbs are sharpened into scalpels.
Language has precision.
Even contempt wears a tie.
No one confuses parliamentary combat with football hooliganism.
That is what evolved democracies understand:
Institutions matter more than ego.
Office matters more than theatrics.
Language reflects culture.
India proudly calls itself the world’s largest democracy.
True.
But democracy is not measured by noise.
A fish market is also noisy.
The true test of democracy lies in the maturity of its institutions, the dignity of its discourse, and the seriousness of those entrusted with constitutional office.
And here, frankly, one worries.
Because something in our public discourse has begun to rot.
Too much shouting.
Too much chest-beating.
Too much performative outrage.
Too much cheap theatre masquerading as political conviction.
Too much verbal sewage flowing through television studios, public rallies, and increasingly, Parliament itself.
At times, one is no longer sure whether one is watching democratic deliberation or a badly supervised lunatic circus.
And then you rise.
And offer the nation “traitor.”
How magnificently cheap.
Let us be clear.
“Traitor” is not criticism.
It is not dissent.
It is not rhetorical flourish.
It is an accusation of betrayal against the Republic itself.
That is not the vocabulary of parliamentary democracy.
That is the vocabulary of mobs.
If you possess evidence that the Prime Minister has betrayed India, the Constitution provides instruments.
Parliament. Privilege. Committees. Courts. Evidence. Procedure.Documentation.
That is how adults in constitutional democracies behave.
But to stand before a political audience and hurl the word „traitor“ like an angry brick through the window of constitutional civility is not courage.
It is political delinquency.
And perhaps delinquency has become the natural language of your 150 year old party that has forgotten the difference between opposition and decay.
Its better minds have either disembarked, been pushed overboard, or quietly begun rowing away.
History teaches us that rats are often first to detect structural failure.
One suspects they already have.
And your cheerleaders?
That permanently agitated chorus of slogan mechanics, drawing-room revolutionaries, outrage merchants, and political enablers applauding every reckless utterance?
They are not rescuing your ship.
They are merely providing background music as it sinks.
And you, Mr Gandhi?
You are not steering.
You are sinking in it.
Stuck in the middle of a political cesspool your party helped create.
A sludge of entitlement.
And here lies the cruel irony:
The more you wriggle with your stupid utterances, the deeper you sink.
Because every outburst confirms the caricature.
Every reckless phrase shrinks your credibility.
Every undisciplined performance reminds the nation why your party’s decline continues.
You had any number of legitimate battlefields – serious issues confronting the nation.
That is what serious oppositions do.
Instead, you chose the vocabulary of the gutter.
That choice tells the country everything.
Perhaps Narendra Modi’s real offence, in your political imagination, is not policy.
He did not emerge from the carefully upholstered ecosystems of dynastic privilege.
He arrived from outside the velvet rope.
Democracy committed the unforgivable sin of allowing an outsider into the inner chamber.
And some people have never emotionally recovered.
So instead of forensic opposition, India gets emotional theatre.
Instead of disciplined argument, public tantrums
Instead of constitutional seriousness, verbal sludge.
India desperately needs a serious Opposition.
A fierce one.
A relentless one.
A forensic one.
An Opposition capable of drawing blood with facts instead of frothing with adjectives.
Because democracy without opposition becomes arrogance.
But opposition without seriousness becomes farce.
And the saddest part, Mr Gandhi?
You no longer seem to notice the stench—as you sink ever deeper into the cesspool sinkhole of your own making.
Yours faithfully,
A citizen who still believes constitutional office should rise above the gutter—not descend into it.
Mohan Murti
Advocate & International Industry Arbitrator
Former Managing Director- Europe
Reliance Industries Ltd Germany
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.