Out of the granted applications for employment, authorisations were issued to only 7% of men and the rest went to women applicants, according to a report by the independent Congressional Research Service.
Research paper, however, finds lowest indebtedness level among Muslims at 12.3% & highest among Hindus at 14.9%. Overall national financial inclusion level at 87.2%, indebtedness at 14.7%.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
अगर किसी भी देश का नागरिक या किसी भी धर्म का हो क्या ऐसे नागरिकौ को जो दूसरे देश में जाकर रहना चाहते तो क्या उनको उस देश का सम्मान और क़ानून का पालन नही करना चाहिए। मैं भी जर्मनी में जर्मन क़ानून का दिल से पालन करता हूँ अगर कुछ बचपन में कमी रह गई या नही सीख पाये तो मेरा फ़र्ज़ और दायित्व बनता हैं कि जिसे जिस देश में रहना हैं तो उसका पालन करना हैं ये इतना आसान नही हैं इन्सान लालची लाल हैं केवल लेना जानता हैं जब देने का नम्बर आता हैं तो उसका निजी क़ानून तलता हैं जब किसी देश में सभी के लिए क़ानून बन गया हैं तो कुछ लोग आगर नया क़ानून नही माँग सकते हैं क्योकि देश और सरकार क़ानून से तलती हैं । हम भारत से आते हैं तो हमें विश्व के किसी देश में समस्या नही होती हैं क्योकि हम दिल से रहना और स्वंय को बदलना चाहते हैं ऐसा नही कि हम किसी से कमजोर हैं आज भारतीऔ ने IT क्षेत्र में भारत को सम्मानित किया हैं । क्या भारत सरकार को देश में बाहरी लौंगों से भारतीऔ की सुरक्षा देने का अधिकार नही हैं ऐसा नही हो सकता हैं भारत हर इन्सान को शरण दे । क्यो कि भारत को स्वंय ही समस्या हैं ऐसा जब होता हैं जब किसी देश में जन मानव की जरुरत हो । जो लोग स्वंय देश को छोड़ कर आते हैं क्या ऐसे लोग अपने देश में योगदान नही दे सकते हैं । फिर समस्या इस बात की भी हो सकती हैं कि कौन क्या हैं वह क्या चाहता क्या वह देश में शान्ति से रहेगा कि दंगा करेगा .
भारत की राजनीति में या सरकार जो कर रही हैं तो देश की सुरक्षा के लिए । हम हिन्दु क्या ग़ुलाम बने रहने के लिए पैदा हुए हैं । नही क़तई नही । अगर भारत में किसी भी से हिन्दु आता हैं तो उसका स्वागत हैं क्योकि हिन्दुऔ की संख्या दूसरे देशों में कम हुई कहाँ गये क्या हुआ क्या कभी मानव अधिकार वालौ में कश्मीरी हिन्दुऔ के बारे जानने की इच्छा की या अन्तरराष्ट्रीय समुदाय में पूछा कि कश्मीरी पंडितों के साथ जो अन्याय हुआ हैं क्या ये मानव अधिकार यही सिखाता हैं कहाँ गया ऐमेस्टी इन्टरनेशलन ।
बताऔ भाई चर्चा कपो न कि CAA,
मुझ से जब सरकार / सरकारी कागज माँगती हैं तो मुझे भी देने पड़ते हैं । भारत सरकार नें सभी की ज़िम्मेदारी का ढेका नही ले रखा हैं ।
जय हिन्द
The analogy is incorrect. Nonmuslims are not denied citizenship in the CAA. Only time for citizenship is different. Also the difference is between legal and ilkegal immigants. The actal name for the CAA should have been illegal immigrant amnesty act. This is no different than the way illegal immigrants from sifferent groups are treated around the world
Harish, u r dead wrong, pal. You are a literate, educated individual who could muster all the “right docs” with which u can prove u came into the USA legally. But, do you indeed believe millions of poor, destitute, uneducated, God forsaken Indians, citizens indeed with claim to the soil of India more solid than any claim you can ever muster over the soil of America if not for America’s welcoming law, have that luxury?Therefore, the primary problem is how does your Modi intend to find out who indeed is genuine Indian citizen. Well, he actually has a simple plan to meet his Hindutva goal. Hindutva’s goal is to get rid of Islam in India altogether and it is your goal as well. Modi would simply sift out Muslims who cant produce the right docs while he wud allow everyone else without docs to remain as citizens. So, you see, u r fooling nobody here.
More intellectual calisthenics by authors looking to malign certain members of the diaspora, in this instance, by equating them to those that institutionalized racial supremacy. A bit of a stretch.
The sub-continent was divided for political reasons by group A, claiming to represent the religious interests of millions of people. This resulted in a state sponsored, and institutionalized, cleansing of groups B-Z, from certain geographical areas; trickles of which continue to date.
Is the author actually advocating for groups B-Z to consider giving Naturalization status to illegal migrants from group A, as a one time remedy?
If so, it would be constructive to provide a framing reference, or an example from history rather than scolding individuals who clearly think groups B-Z were violently othered, and hence deserve fastracked Naturalization so they can move-on.
why hide behind A/B-Z and distort history? The closest parallel is with early Nazi Germany – remember Hitler also came to power through democratic means. The point is that we need to learn from the “good Germans” of those times who did not realize the dangers of Hitler. Now of course Germany has compensated many-fold for the heinous mistakes of the past, and giving citizenship to Jews of any extraction is one of these measures. Let us hope India does not have to go through all that to understand the dangers of raising hate against any section of society. NRIs, especially those who are vocal about Indian affairs, are as responsible as those who live in India for ensuring that India 2020s does not become Deutschland 1930s.
Comparisons to the Holocaust are disrespectful to what happened to the Jewish and Roma people.
However, it seems like you’re focusing on imagined ethnic cleansing in the sub-continent rather than recognizing the actual cleansing that is well documented in history and experienced by many till date, either in person, or through intergenerational trauma.
Mustn’t overlook the fact that India continues to offer political asylum and recognize political refugees from all neighbouring countries.
NRIs in the US like me are here legally and are patiently waiting for our turn to get permanent residency. We didn’t come here illegally in pursuit of economic opportunities. If I’m asked to provide documentation for my legal presence in the US, I can produce all the paperwork needed in 5 minutes. So it is not quite the same to compare us to an illegal immigrant who is seeking sanctuary in India. I sympathize with their position – but your comparison is not quite accurate.
अगर किसी भी देश का नागरिक या किसी भी धर्म का हो क्या ऐसे नागरिकौ को जो दूसरे देश में जाकर रहना चाहते तो क्या उनको उस देश का सम्मान और क़ानून का पालन नही करना चाहिए। मैं भी जर्मनी में जर्मन क़ानून का दिल से पालन करता हूँ अगर कुछ बचपन में कमी रह गई या नही सीख पाये तो मेरा फ़र्ज़ और दायित्व बनता हैं कि जिसे जिस देश में रहना हैं तो उसका पालन करना हैं ये इतना आसान नही हैं इन्सान लालची लाल हैं केवल लेना जानता हैं जब देने का नम्बर आता हैं तो उसका निजी क़ानून तलता हैं जब किसी देश में सभी के लिए क़ानून बन गया हैं तो कुछ लोग आगर नया क़ानून नही माँग सकते हैं क्योकि देश और सरकार क़ानून से तलती हैं । हम भारत से आते हैं तो हमें विश्व के किसी देश में समस्या नही होती हैं क्योकि हम दिल से रहना और स्वंय को बदलना चाहते हैं ऐसा नही कि हम किसी से कमजोर हैं आज भारतीऔ ने IT क्षेत्र में भारत को सम्मानित किया हैं । क्या भारत सरकार को देश में बाहरी लौंगों से भारतीऔ की सुरक्षा देने का अधिकार नही हैं ऐसा नही हो सकता हैं भारत हर इन्सान को शरण दे । क्यो कि भारत को स्वंय ही समस्या हैं ऐसा जब होता हैं जब किसी देश में जन मानव की जरुरत हो । जो लोग स्वंय देश को छोड़ कर आते हैं क्या ऐसे लोग अपने देश में योगदान नही दे सकते हैं । फिर समस्या इस बात की भी हो सकती हैं कि कौन क्या हैं वह क्या चाहता क्या वह देश में शान्ति से रहेगा कि दंगा करेगा .
भारत की राजनीति में या सरकार जो कर रही हैं तो देश की सुरक्षा के लिए । हम हिन्दु क्या ग़ुलाम बने रहने के लिए पैदा हुए हैं । नही क़तई नही । अगर भारत में किसी भी से हिन्दु आता हैं तो उसका स्वागत हैं क्योकि हिन्दुऔ की संख्या दूसरे देशों में कम हुई कहाँ गये क्या हुआ क्या कभी मानव अधिकार वालौ में कश्मीरी हिन्दुऔ के बारे जानने की इच्छा की या अन्तरराष्ट्रीय समुदाय में पूछा कि कश्मीरी पंडितों के साथ जो अन्याय हुआ हैं क्या ये मानव अधिकार यही सिखाता हैं कहाँ गया ऐमेस्टी इन्टरनेशलन ।
बताऔ भाई चर्चा कपो न कि CAA,
मुझ से जब सरकार / सरकारी कागज माँगती हैं तो मुझे भी देने पड़ते हैं । भारत सरकार नें सभी की ज़िम्मेदारी का ढेका नही ले रखा हैं ।
जय हिन्द
The analogy is incorrect. Nonmuslims are not denied citizenship in the CAA. Only time for citizenship is different. Also the difference is between legal and ilkegal immigants. The actal name for the CAA should have been illegal immigrant amnesty act. This is no different than the way illegal immigrants from sifferent groups are treated around the world
Harish, u r dead wrong, pal. You are a literate, educated individual who could muster all the “right docs” with which u can prove u came into the USA legally. But, do you indeed believe millions of poor, destitute, uneducated, God forsaken Indians, citizens indeed with claim to the soil of India more solid than any claim you can ever muster over the soil of America if not for America’s welcoming law, have that luxury?Therefore, the primary problem is how does your Modi intend to find out who indeed is genuine Indian citizen. Well, he actually has a simple plan to meet his Hindutva goal. Hindutva’s goal is to get rid of Islam in India altogether and it is your goal as well. Modi would simply sift out Muslims who cant produce the right docs while he wud allow everyone else without docs to remain as citizens. So, you see, u r fooling nobody here.
More intellectual calisthenics by authors looking to malign certain members of the diaspora, in this instance, by equating them to those that institutionalized racial supremacy. A bit of a stretch.
The sub-continent was divided for political reasons by group A, claiming to represent the religious interests of millions of people. This resulted in a state sponsored, and institutionalized, cleansing of groups B-Z, from certain geographical areas; trickles of which continue to date.
Is the author actually advocating for groups B-Z to consider giving Naturalization status to illegal migrants from group A, as a one time remedy?
If so, it would be constructive to provide a framing reference, or an example from history rather than scolding individuals who clearly think groups B-Z were violently othered, and hence deserve fastracked Naturalization so they can move-on.
why hide behind A/B-Z and distort history? The closest parallel is with early Nazi Germany – remember Hitler also came to power through democratic means. The point is that we need to learn from the “good Germans” of those times who did not realize the dangers of Hitler. Now of course Germany has compensated many-fold for the heinous mistakes of the past, and giving citizenship to Jews of any extraction is one of these measures. Let us hope India does not have to go through all that to understand the dangers of raising hate against any section of society. NRIs, especially those who are vocal about Indian affairs, are as responsible as those who live in India for ensuring that India 2020s does not become Deutschland 1930s.
Comparisons to the Holocaust are disrespectful to what happened to the Jewish and Roma people.
However, it seems like you’re focusing on imagined ethnic cleansing in the sub-continent rather than recognizing the actual cleansing that is well documented in history and experienced by many till date, either in person, or through intergenerational trauma.
Mustn’t overlook the fact that India continues to offer political asylum and recognize political refugees from all neighbouring countries.
NRIs in the US like me are here legally and are patiently waiting for our turn to get permanent residency. We didn’t come here illegally in pursuit of economic opportunities. If I’m asked to provide documentation for my legal presence in the US, I can produce all the paperwork needed in 5 minutes. So it is not quite the same to compare us to an illegal immigrant who is seeking sanctuary in India. I sympathize with their position – but your comparison is not quite accurate.
Read more.
There are around 4.5 Lakh of indian illegal migrant in USA.
Your might be privileged. Your bigotry could harm these Lakh people.