If the government can provide police protection for occasions like the Amarnath Yatra, why was it unable to provide security for Dalits at Bhima Koregaon event.
One has to be incredibly credulous to buy BJP spin masters’ argument that the government got rid of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar for harmonious relationship with the judiciary.
Modi government had also made numerous efforts to establish peace with Pakistan but has now adopted a different path, militarily, to establish peace, adds defence minister.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
The author says’ The false narrative manufactured by the opposition and a section of Left-leaning intelligentsia on systemic oppression of Dalits in the last five years has disastrously collapsed’.
If, as per the author, the above has collapsed disastrously, which means the author is convinced of its disastrous implications i. e. he establishes that the collapse was a disaster while the spirit of the article loudly shouts that the collapse was solicited, was not an unwarranted one.
Hence, it was anything but a disastrous collapse for those who endorse the views of the author, including the author himself. Or else, If he himself believes that the collapse was disastrous, he is not endorsing the so-called collapse because the veterans of the BJP would say that the collapse was a welcome one.
Not making any sense. Your paragraph sounds like a tongue twister. The author has argued convincingly based on ground reality as reflected in the Lok Sabha results.
The family-based regional parties’ enterprise that were thriving on social justice were not able to capture the subaltern mind.
The above had better be rephrased as under:
‘The family-based regional party enterprises’ that were thriving on social justice were not able to capture the subaltern mind.
The phrase ‘ the subaltern mind’paints the Dalit voters in a deep grey, calling them subaltern mind is same as rendering them undeserving, politically unintelligent and easy-to-be cajoled and soft-soaped.
The author says’ The false narrative manufactured by the opposition and a section of Left-leaning intelligentsia on systemic oppression of Dalits in the last five years has disastrously collapsed’.
If, as per the author, the above has collapsed disastrously, which means the author is convinced of its disastrous implications i. e. he establishes that the collapse was a disaster while the spirit of the article loudly shouts that the collapse was solicited, was not an unwarranted one.
Hence, it was anything but a disastrous collapse for those who endorse the views of the author, including the author himself. Or else, If he himself believes that the collapse was disastrous, he is not endorsing the so-called collapse because the veterans of the BJP would say that the collapse was a welcome one.
Not making any sense. Your paragraph sounds like a tongue twister. The author has argued convincingly based on ground reality as reflected in the Lok Sabha results.
The family-based regional parties’ enterprise that were thriving on social justice were not able to capture the subaltern mind.
The above had better be rephrased as under:
‘The family-based regional party enterprises’ that were thriving on social justice were not able to capture the subaltern mind.
The phrase ‘ the subaltern mind’paints the Dalit voters in a deep grey, calling them subaltern mind is same as rendering them undeserving, politically unintelligent and easy-to-be cajoled and soft-soaped.