The Press in a liberal democracy has to be a forum for the expression of different points of view. It must not suppress, taint or adulterate news, wrote Sachin Sen in 1960.
Research paper, however, finds lowest indebtedness level among Muslims at 12.3% & highest among Hindus at 14.9%. Overall national financial inclusion level at 87.2%, indebtedness at 14.7%.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
I don’t understand how to prohibit the use of science such as surrogacy! For some people, including me, this is the only chance to have their own biological child. If it’s not a miracle, what is it? Our surrogate mother was found in a clinic where we were working on infertility. We chose Ukraine because surrogacy is allowed there. Our clinic is called the Feskov Reproductive Group, and all mothers are healthy and tested there. The agreement is supported by a contract, so there is a certain guarantee that everything will be in order. Birth certificates contain only parents, travel documents were received within a few days. And no prohibitions, no fines, take your child and go home to any country in the world. No one will ever know that it is a child from a surrogate mother. Good luck to everyone who wants children!
We spend a lot of time, resources and effort enforcing laws. A tiny fraction of that should be invested at the stage of drafting. What precisely is is the object / advantage of banning commercial surrogacy, if it is working for both parties. Consider the maze of laws on organ donation. When was the last time a person of significance experienced the faintest difficulty in procuring a kidney or a liver.
I don’t understand how to prohibit the use of science such as surrogacy! For some people, including me, this is the only chance to have their own biological child. If it’s not a miracle, what is it? Our surrogate mother was found in a clinic where we were working on infertility. We chose Ukraine because surrogacy is allowed there. Our clinic is called the Feskov Reproductive Group, and all mothers are healthy and tested there. The agreement is supported by a contract, so there is a certain guarantee that everything will be in order. Birth certificates contain only parents, travel documents were received within a few days. And no prohibitions, no fines, take your child and go home to any country in the world. No one will ever know that it is a child from a surrogate mother. Good luck to everyone who wants children!
Banning is not a solution. Regulation is. Don’t know whether cabinet, assembly really discussed pros and cons of it.
It deprives intended parents from parenthood. It deprives intending surrogate from a living.
In India where a poor can not have a basic earnings, this law would ban that source too.
In fact law should look to surrogate well being, empowering her on medical situations and bring in transperancy in financial transaction.
Any law which prohibits intending parenthood from the it’s happiness should be done away with.
We spend a lot of time, resources and effort enforcing laws. A tiny fraction of that should be invested at the stage of drafting. What precisely is is the object / advantage of banning commercial surrogacy, if it is working for both parties. Consider the maze of laws on organ donation. When was the last time a person of significance experienced the faintest difficulty in procuring a kidney or a liver.