In a letter to the Supreme Court, SCBA president Dushyan Dave notes that such extraordinarily urgent listings don't take place without specific orders from the Chief Justice of India.
Vikas Singh, also president of the Supreme Court Bar Association, rebutted Prashant Bhushan’s request seeking an in-house probe into the CJI’s actions.
Sources say issues raised by the four Supreme Court judges cannot be 'settled'. Meanwhile, Prashant Bhushan's CJAR moves court asking for in-house probe.
The Loya case being assigned to a particular bench by the CJI was one of the issues raised by the four protesting judges at their press conference Friday.
Within the modern-day Samudra Manthan lies the opportunity for India to redefine its role on the world stage by building a robust, adaptive security architecture.
Indian toymakers are now exploring new markets, but they want govt to negotiate a trade deal with US soon, introduce incentives and subsidies to make the industry more competitive.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
Top legal guns boom when a crorepati well connected with political heavy weight goes to top court for relief, which he gets in ordinary course of time as legal luxury. What about the agony and anguish of victims family.Supreme Court judge on his birthday has done grave injustice to them.Law is a jugglery of words.
Its unfortunate to see the letter from Dushyant Dave. Hope he ll understand now with the Supreme courts observation, how devastating you guys have done to Arnav for no reason. I wish the Maharashtra govt is fired and president rule is applied . Anyway, this govt was not chosen by the people in the first place, just for the power, they compromised their respective ethics. Well, not to say anything about Mumbai police. They are all well known now in the whole world.
Advocate Dave, being a lawyer cannot directly question the mAter of Roster’s intentions for the past 4 years It is clear that the CJI’s have totally been arm twisted into supporting the BJP. And we talk about justice in this country.
An apt reply has been given by wife of Arnab Goswami, citing several cases where the Supreme Court has heard matters with extreme urgency. On 29th Augusta, 2019 , a petition in Romila Thapar vs. Union of India was taken up by the honourable court on the same day. Mr. Dave defended Thapar as her lawyer. .Mr Vinod Dua’s case was also taken up urgently during Covid pandemic. Mr. Dave did not protest. There are many such cases where the Supreme Court has heard cases on urgent basis on humanitarian grounds. I don’t know why Mr. Dave is protesting in a case in which he has no locus standii. I do not know if Mr. Arnab Goswami is guilty or not or whether he deserved to be released on bail. But certainly this seems to a malicious attempt to prejudice the case, though the attempt is bound to fail as the Justices of the Apex Court shall not be influenced by such tactics and will examine the case on its merit. Let justice prevail, notwithstanding what Mr. Dave thinks.
I wish SC has a transparent policy and mechanism to handle such cases. I think cases concerning national security and gross abuse of human/ personal liberty of an individual may be made an exception. This should be available to poorest of the poor and not only to a resourceful individual who can afford services of one of the highest paid and renowned advocate. We must have faith in District, High Court and SC and the established time-tested procedures …..and the faith and respect would come if impartiality is reflected in their decisions/judgements………..we need to strengthen the institutions… …. ….. responsibilities lies on all but the main responsibility lies on individuals who are occupying the positions in the institutions….
Bombay high court & Allahabad high court needs overhauling. They are selective and refused to work longer hours to clear the caseload before them, Supreme court should establish a procedure to review lower courts. People should not have to go to supreme court to get justice foe such things as bail.
if maha govt can get him arrested without following any protocols, that is okay with you hypocrites?
Dushyant Dave , a nehru family sycophant had no problem when Bombay High court was rushing to provide bail to Teesta Setalvad and protect her from police custody.
These lefty goons have been getting supreme court to hear their pleas even over phone and gettting bail within an hour for urban naxals and anti-nationals. What are these bozos complaining about?
No use crying over milk one hime/herself has spilt. The use (or misuse, as is being alleged here by the trade union of the SC) only makes us shrug and think of how the NJAC – ratified by the PM, Prez, Parliament and 16 states and enacted – was struck down on a PIL by some advocates, or when the court at opened at 3 am for a condemned terrorist, or several times in the middle of the night for the Karnataka elections which became a nightly comedy show. People only respect institutions that truly uphold the letter and spirit of the law, not play with it over decades per their personal preferences. And the less said about “gross abuse of administrative power” after the Maha nightmare that has unfolded in plain daylight for months now, the better. Though, good to have those who corrupted the system now fight to fix it, once the ‘others’ figured out how to beat them at their own game. And till the collegium and dynasty succession exist in our courts, we simply cannot take it seriously except for the mortal fear of ‘contempt of court’.
Top legal guns boom when a crorepati well connected with political heavy weight goes to top court for relief, which he gets in ordinary course of time as legal luxury. What about the agony and anguish of victims family.Supreme Court judge on his birthday has done grave injustice to them.Law is a jugglery of words.
Its unfortunate to see the letter from Dushyant Dave. Hope he ll understand now with the Supreme courts observation, how devastating you guys have done to Arnav for no reason. I wish the Maharashtra govt is fired and president rule is applied . Anyway, this govt was not chosen by the people in the first place, just for the power, they compromised their respective ethics. Well, not to say anything about Mumbai police. They are all well known now in the whole world.
Advocate Dave, being a lawyer cannot directly question the mAter of Roster’s intentions for the past 4 years It is clear that the CJI’s have totally been arm twisted into supporting the BJP. And we talk about justice in this country.
An apt reply has been given by wife of Arnab Goswami, citing several cases where the Supreme Court has heard matters with extreme urgency. On 29th Augusta, 2019 , a petition in Romila Thapar vs. Union of India was taken up by the honourable court on the same day. Mr. Dave defended Thapar as her lawyer. .Mr Vinod Dua’s case was also taken up urgently during Covid pandemic. Mr. Dave did not protest. There are many such cases where the Supreme Court has heard cases on urgent basis on humanitarian grounds. I don’t know why Mr. Dave is protesting in a case in which he has no locus standii. I do not know if Mr. Arnab Goswami is guilty or not or whether he deserved to be released on bail. But certainly this seems to a malicious attempt to prejudice the case, though the attempt is bound to fail as the Justices of the Apex Court shall not be influenced by such tactics and will examine the case on its merit. Let justice prevail, notwithstanding what Mr. Dave thinks.
I wish SC has a transparent policy and mechanism to handle such cases. I think cases concerning national security and gross abuse of human/ personal liberty of an individual may be made an exception. This should be available to poorest of the poor and not only to a resourceful individual who can afford services of one of the highest paid and renowned advocate. We must have faith in District, High Court and SC and the established time-tested procedures …..and the faith and respect would come if impartiality is reflected in their decisions/judgements………..we need to strengthen the institutions… …. ….. responsibilities lies on all but the main responsibility lies on individuals who are occupying the positions in the institutions….
Bombay high court & Allahabad high court needs overhauling. They are selective and refused to work longer hours to clear the caseload before them, Supreme court should establish a procedure to review lower courts. People should not have to go to supreme court to get justice foe such things as bail.
if maha govt can get him arrested without following any protocols, that is okay with you hypocrites?
Dushyant Dave , a nehru family sycophant had no problem when Bombay High court was rushing to provide bail to Teesta Setalvad and protect her from police custody.
This shakes the ordinary citizen’s faith in the impartiality and fairness of the system.
These lefty goons have been getting supreme court to hear their pleas even over phone and gettting bail within an hour for urban naxals and anti-nationals. What are these bozos complaining about?
No use crying over milk one hime/herself has spilt. The use (or misuse, as is being alleged here by the trade union of the SC) only makes us shrug and think of how the NJAC – ratified by the PM, Prez, Parliament and 16 states and enacted – was struck down on a PIL by some advocates, or when the court at opened at 3 am for a condemned terrorist, or several times in the middle of the night for the Karnataka elections which became a nightly comedy show. People only respect institutions that truly uphold the letter and spirit of the law, not play with it over decades per their personal preferences. And the less said about “gross abuse of administrative power” after the Maha nightmare that has unfolded in plain daylight for months now, the better. Though, good to have those who corrupted the system now fight to fix it, once the ‘others’ figured out how to beat them at their own game. And till the collegium and dynasty succession exist in our courts, we simply cannot take it seriously except for the mortal fear of ‘contempt of court’.
No such questiosn were raised when Chidambaram abused the SC, Why?