SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
Many really smart people now share the position that playing cricket with Pakistan is politically, strategically and morally wrong. It is just a poor appreciation of competitive sport.
When you are a non-believer, act on your own. If you are a Muslim by name, there should be no talk of interference in Sharia. You are free to make anyone your heir. There is no need to create conflict and help the right wing people.
Print deliberately published the report in such detail. After all, what was the need for print to print this biased report. When she does not consider herself a Muslim, then why does she talk about personal law. He is free to make his own decision.
Sharia law of inheritance applies after death in case there is no will written by deceased…. why doesn’t this lady transfer all her assests in name of daughter…. no law stops that…even her father is alive…he can do the same…
If there is any wrong intepretation of sharia law, the interpretation needs to be changed, not the law….
Logically, if she doesn’t declare herself as Muslim, Muslim personal law won’t be applicable….
it seems she’s either lost her way out or that she’s have just half knowledge…the interpretation of muslim personal law is corrupted… what the muslim law board rule states is when the father had died without any written or oral will without any witnesses then the property would be distributed among children in a formula manner where in 1/3 to daughter some % to mother, and remaining % to sons… but in case if the father is alive and he he makes his will of 100% inheritance to his daughter, then sharia does allow it and there is no need of any fuss at all… so it means, when a muslim dies without making any will on inheritance, then its the sharia law to be followed and a muslim does have a will wither written or communicated orally with witnesses, then sharia needs to act according to that will…here in this case, seems the lady’s father is alive…
When you are a non-believer, act on your own. If you are a Muslim by name, there should be no talk of interference in Sharia. You are free to make anyone your heir. There is no need to create conflict and help the right wing people.
Print deliberately published the report in such detail. After all, what was the need for print to print this biased report. When she does not consider herself a Muslim, then why does she talk about personal law. He is free to make his own decision.
Sharia law of inheritance applies after death in case there is no will written by deceased…. why doesn’t this lady transfer all her assests in name of daughter…. no law stops that…even her father is alive…he can do the same…
If there is any wrong intepretation of sharia law, the interpretation needs to be changed, not the law….
Logically, if she doesn’t declare herself as Muslim, Muslim personal law won’t be applicable….
also, when she herself says she’s no more a muslim, why such a headline??? remove religion name from the headline of this story!!
it seems she’s either lost her way out or that she’s have just half knowledge…the interpretation of muslim personal law is corrupted… what the muslim law board rule states is when the father had died without any written or oral will without any witnesses then the property would be distributed among children in a formula manner where in 1/3 to daughter some % to mother, and remaining % to sons… but in case if the father is alive and he he makes his will of 100% inheritance to his daughter, then sharia does allow it and there is no need of any fuss at all… so it means, when a muslim dies without making any will on inheritance, then its the sharia law to be followed and a muslim does have a will wither written or communicated orally with witnesses, then sharia needs to act according to that will…here in this case, seems the lady’s father is alive…