Section 377 of Chapter XVI in the Indian Penal Code states: “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.” This British law dates back to 1861 and criminalises sexual activities against the order of nature and the ambit of this law extends to any sexual union involving penile insertion.
Ur allegation against chief justice is setting bad precedent , incorrect , u seem to b chamacha of Congress
He need not stress as there are hardly 17 days remained.
ThePrint should take a lead to find the reason behind monopolising all important cases to himself by the CJI. Why other members of collegium were not co-opted? In all these cases a set group of judges have been co- opted time & again. This manner of exclusion of brother judges has never been witnessed by the the Indian Judiciary since 1950. It is intriguing that despite controversies, criticism, corruption charges , with supporting evidences/ circumtancial evidences , CJI could blatantly & boldly remain indifferent to his brother judges. Will this questionable working style has some planed assurance of some high post retiral placement for him. If that happens ( the chances of which are certainly 100%), then one can assure himself that manipulations & corruption are to stay with us for endless decades. If corruption in judiciary is not arrested, first of all, corruption else where can not ever be uprooted. It is really unfortunate !!!