The temple had opened Friday amid a tense standoff involving social activist Trupti Desai in Kochi and a move by its administrator to seek time from the Supreme Court to implement its verdict.
Despite growing passenger volume, 11 out of 14 carriers reported losses in 2023-24. IndiGo recorded profit of Rs 8,167 crore, which reduced to Rs 7.253 crore in 2024-25.
Dubai airshow crash & pilot death have rekindled concerns over pilot safety, and need for smarter automated systems that can step in when G-forces, temporary loss of consciousness hit the pilot.
None of Pakistan’s PMs has lasted 5 years. That the current PM has given Asim Munir 5 years shows that of all military dictatorships history has seen, Pakistan’s is most creative.
Muslim women can enter into the mosque But that mosque should be separated from male mosque . See the basic idea is Men and Women who are not linked by nikah can not offer prayer together. This is haram in Islam. It is the essential religion practice of Islam that strange Man and Women can not offer nimaz together . So we should repect the sentiment and the reason behind this rule.
AMEND THE CONSTITUTION THAT NO ONE COULD INTERFERE INCLUDING SUPREME COURT ON RELIGIOUS MATTERS. ALSO RELIGIOUS FUNDS COULD NOT BE HANDLED BY ANYONE INCLUDING ANY GOVT OR SC.
The funny part is that the Print has quoted a minority judgement since it is valueless. If Indu Malhotra’s judgement had prevailed then this judgement would have been accepted. Why this subterfuge???
Consistently, that is what we ask of the Supreme Court of India. For a common man it is quite strange in the way they function! They sit on important cases and deal with frivolous cases which are mostly brought to the court by a small coterie of lawyers. Sometimes I wonder whether this is Supreme Court of India or the Municipal Court of Delhi!!
Amend the constitution to pass an ordinance barring all indian courts in interfering with Hindu religious beliefs and all previous judgements are quashed. Nobody should be allowed to file any such cases in courts in future.
I saw many comments saying muslims were the one who filed petition for entry of woman in Sabarimala. I would ask people to go through proper facts before making such wrong accusations. The PIL for Sabarimala issues was filed by Bhakti Pasrija, Prerna Kumari, Sudha Pal and Laxmi Shastri (you can verify this if you wants). So please dont drag a religion into Sabarimala discussion which has nothing to do with Sabarimala issue.
For a layman’s wisdom- If the recent Sabarimala law cannot be used for passing a similar judgement bcoz of reminiscences of an individual, then the Sabarimala law should be scrapped, lest it should not remain on paper if the reality has been accepted. Need not be a lawyer to understand this
It can’t be that because SC allowed women entry into Sabarimala, that women should be allowed in mosque also. If SC did not keep in mind the customs, practices, and sentiments before pronouncing Sabarimala judgement, it was their shortcomings. Besides, the main petition in the case of Sabarimala was placed by the lawyers who had no idea of the customs or, any of them ever seen the place to understand what and why such practice is in place. In the same scenario, court can’t refer to indu Malhotra’s reference to her judgements that hindu mahasabha can’t petition for women entry in mosque and only a muslim women can appeal.
Allowing women into mosques need to be decided by their religion and need to be challenged by their women only.
SC must appoint a higher bench on Sabarimala case and a decision need to taken, without dragging further.
Yes I also feel that there are double standards of supreme court with leftist mindset or not understanding the cultural values prevailing in community. Faiths should not contested in courts unless it is really affects (I can say damages) somebody’s day to day life. Here I agree if a Muslim woman should be allowed for prayers mosques that should be contested by them not by others.
There is no such as ‘Muslim women cannot enter masjid’. Indian Hindu parties will do snything to harrass muslims. Majority of 80% of Racist indian Hindus will do this kind if crap.
It is Muslims who interfered into Hindu religion. Temples were destroyed by Muslims, being minority still they harrased Hindu s who are in majority.
Dear don’t say racists about indians . If your community is 51% nobody can comment over here.
All over the world Islamic animals killing their own tribe shouting kafirs and bombing mosques .
Those gutter animals who abuse Hindus as racists and extremists are very much happy if Islamic countries follows blasphey and apostasy denying religious freedom to other minorities .
Corrupt judges and Leftist mindsets are responsible for such attitudes where the judiciary is allowed to get away with transgressions against Hindus while Muslims are spared and protected. The day Hindus rise in armed struggle one wonders where these judges will run!
The arrogant and hatred-blinded swamy got what he deserved.
How come a petition by Muslim was allowed and ruled in favour his favour in case if Sabarinala. Such myopic views of the SC should be condemned. What type of double standards?
The Islamic wing of BJP and Islamic social activists must without delay file a case again.The SC that gave an unimplentable ruling against the Hindus in Sabarimala verdict must be made to eat its words
Muslim women can enter into the mosque But that mosque should be separated from male mosque . See the basic idea is Men and Women who are not linked by nikah can not offer prayer together. This is haram in Islam. It is the essential religion practice of Islam that strange Man and Women can not offer nimaz together . So we should repect the sentiment and the reason behind this rule.
AMEND THE CONSTITUTION THAT NO ONE COULD INTERFERE INCLUDING SUPREME COURT ON RELIGIOUS MATTERS. ALSO RELIGIOUS FUNDS COULD NOT BE HANDLED BY ANYONE INCLUDING ANY GOVT OR SC.
The funny part is that the Print has quoted a minority judgement since it is valueless. If Indu Malhotra’s judgement had prevailed then this judgement would have been accepted. Why this subterfuge???
Consistently, that is what we ask of the Supreme Court of India. For a common man it is quite strange in the way they function! They sit on important cases and deal with frivolous cases which are mostly brought to the court by a small coterie of lawyers. Sometimes I wonder whether this is Supreme Court of India or the Municipal Court of Delhi!!
Amend the constitution to pass an ordinance barring all indian courts in interfering with Hindu religious beliefs and all previous judgements are quashed. Nobody should be allowed to file any such cases in courts in future.
I saw many comments saying muslims were the one who filed petition for entry of woman in Sabarimala. I would ask people to go through proper facts before making such wrong accusations. The PIL for Sabarimala issues was filed by Bhakti Pasrija, Prerna Kumari, Sudha Pal and Laxmi Shastri (you can verify this if you wants). So please dont drag a religion into Sabarimala discussion which has nothing to do with Sabarimala issue.
For a layman’s wisdom- If the recent Sabarimala law cannot be used for passing a similar judgement bcoz of reminiscences of an individual, then the Sabarimala law should be scrapped, lest it should not remain on paper if the reality has been accepted. Need not be a lawyer to understand this
It can’t be that because SC allowed women entry into Sabarimala, that women should be allowed in mosque also. If SC did not keep in mind the customs, practices, and sentiments before pronouncing Sabarimala judgement, it was their shortcomings. Besides, the main petition in the case of Sabarimala was placed by the lawyers who had no idea of the customs or, any of them ever seen the place to understand what and why such practice is in place. In the same scenario, court can’t refer to indu Malhotra’s reference to her judgements that hindu mahasabha can’t petition for women entry in mosque and only a muslim women can appeal.
Allowing women into mosques need to be decided by their religion and need to be challenged by their women only.
SC must appoint a higher bench on Sabarimala case and a decision need to taken, without dragging further.
Yes I also feel that there are double standards of supreme court with leftist mindset or not understanding the cultural values prevailing in community. Faiths should not contested in courts unless it is really affects (I can say damages) somebody’s day to day life. Here I agree if a Muslim woman should be allowed for prayers mosques that should be contested by them not by others.
There is no such as ‘Muslim women cannot enter masjid’. Indian Hindu parties will do snything to harrass muslims. Majority of 80% of Racist indian Hindus will do this kind if crap.
It is Muslims who interfered into Hindu religion. Temples were destroyed by Muslims, being minority still they harrased Hindu s who are in majority.
Dear don’t say racists about indians . If your community is 51% nobody can comment over here.
All over the world Islamic animals killing their own tribe shouting kafirs and bombing mosques .
Those gutter animals who abuse Hindus as racists and extremists are very much happy if Islamic countries follows blasphey and apostasy denying religious freedom to other minorities .
Corrupt judges and Leftist mindsets are responsible for such attitudes where the judiciary is allowed to get away with transgressions against Hindus while Muslims are spared and protected. The day Hindus rise in armed struggle one wonders where these judges will run!
The arrogant and hatred-blinded swamy got what he deserved.
How come a petition by Muslim was allowed and ruled in favour his favour in case if Sabarinala. Such myopic views of the SC should be condemned. What type of double standards?
The Islamic wing of BJP and Islamic social activists must without delay file a case again.The SC that gave an unimplentable ruling against the Hindus in Sabarimala verdict must be made to eat its words