Supreme Court took a dim view of Bombay HC's decision to deny bail to Arnab Goswami, saying high courts should not forego their duty, leaving apex court to intervene at all times.
As MVA govt completes one year in Maharashtra, CM Thackeray in an interview to Saamana slams BJP on a number of issues & says alliance is functioning smoothly.
Vijay Athawale, deputy secretary of Maharashtra Assembly, was responding to a contempt notice issued by SC for threatening to penalise Goswami for approaching the top court.
SC directs Arnab and two others accused in the 2018 abetment to suicide case to execute personal bonds of Rs 50,000, and not tamper evidence or influence witnesses.
Ghanshyam Singh, who is also Assistant Vice President of the Republic Media Network, has earlier been questioned on multiple occasions by the CIU, said police.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
Have no comment excepting as follows:-
1. Selective consideration of personal freedom.
2. Wrong assessment that Arnab was not in a position of tampering with evidence. A person whose arrest creates an upheaval in central and UP cabinet is influential enough to tamper with evidence.
3. Since his passport is not confiscated 0, Arnab with family can flee from the country.
4. Why can’t the Honourable SC ask NIA court to be sensitive.
5. Why the Honourable SC declare infamous Sedition act enacted by the British to oppress opposition ultra vire in present context? It is very much aware that the act has been copiously misused.
6. Due to these actions and inaction a large section of population considers the courts including the apex court not to be neutral and not to be impartial.
“…It is the duty of courts across the spectrum — the district judiciary, the high courts and the Supreme Court — to ensure that the criminal law does not become a weapon for the selective harassment of citizens,”
“basic rule of our criminal justice system is ‘bail, not jail’”
“liberty is not a gift for the few”
Ask CJI to read all these statements again but slowly.
May not help. Remember the tweets from Shri Bhushan and a certain picture with “friend’s” expensive Bike in Nagpur.
The gentlemen are now brazen about their intentions. Three noticeable recent events
1. Indian VP recently reminded the judiciary not to overreach. Overreach?? Today? Maybe it was a euphemism to indicate to the tribe to lie low.
2. The first among equals mentioned he is not interested in article 32 cases. Interesting. Better to make it clear in the constitution because this article cases only go to SC.
3. The same gentleman gives a speech standing up for thre executive saying here are limits to free speech. Brilliant.
CJI is correct. India has good supreme court. In case of Bombay high Court there is lot to be desired.
It is that High courts are packed with Indira Gandhi’s committed judges, particularly Bombay & Allahabad high courts. Only person whose civil liberty Bombay High Court wants to protect is Teesta Setalvad. The judges of Bombay high courts are so lazy they did not want to work overtime to clear the cases before them when Supreme Court ask them to clear backlog.
Have no comment excepting as follows:-
1. Selective consideration of personal freedom.
2. Wrong assessment that Arnab was not in a position of tampering with evidence. A person whose arrest creates an upheaval in central and UP cabinet is influential enough to tamper with evidence.
3. Since his passport is not confiscated 0, Arnab with family can flee from the country.
4. Why can’t the Honourable SC ask NIA court to be sensitive.
5. Why the Honourable SC declare infamous Sedition act enacted by the British to oppress opposition ultra vire in present context? It is very much aware that the act has been copiously misused.
6. Due to these actions and inaction a large section of population considers the courts including the apex court not to be neutral and not to be impartial.
Apply the same yardstick to the other long pending cases too..
Because he stands on the right side of the Law …
“…It is the duty of courts across the spectrum — the district judiciary, the high courts and the Supreme Court — to ensure that the criminal law does not become a weapon for the selective harassment of citizens,”
“basic rule of our criminal justice system is ‘bail, not jail’”
“liberty is not a gift for the few”
Ask CJI to read all these statements again but slowly.
May not help. Remember the tweets from Shri Bhushan and a certain picture with “friend’s” expensive Bike in Nagpur.
The gentlemen are now brazen about their intentions. Three noticeable recent events
1. Indian VP recently reminded the judiciary not to overreach. Overreach?? Today? Maybe it was a euphemism to indicate to the tribe to lie low.
2. The first among equals mentioned he is not interested in article 32 cases. Interesting. Better to make it clear in the constitution because this article cases only go to SC.
3. The same gentleman gives a speech standing up for thre executive saying here are limits to free speech. Brilliant.
CJI is correct. India has good supreme court. In case of Bombay high Court there is lot to be desired.
It is that High courts are packed with Indira Gandhi’s committed judges, particularly Bombay & Allahabad high courts. Only person whose civil liberty Bombay High Court wants to protect is Teesta Setalvad. The judges of Bombay high courts are so lazy they did not want to work overtime to clear the cases before them when Supreme Court ask them to clear backlog.