Nominated MP Rakesh Sinha challenges opposition leaders to show their cards on the Ram temple issue. It seems to be a tactical move by BJP ahead of 2019 polls.
While the language war in other states is targeting those who can't speak the local language, in Bengal, even those whose mother tongue is Bengali have to constantly prove their Bengali-ness.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
Capable of being fired in plain and high-altitude areas, it has day-and-night capability and two-way data link to support post-launch target, aim-point update.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
This is a no-brainer. A Ram temple MUST be constructed in Ayodhya, but NOT at the disputed site. Because a “structure” bearing the nameplate of a “mosque” stood at the disputed site, and was pulled down NOT BY PWD OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT but by some unauthorized people without any legal permission.
That’s why a Commission was set up to fix the responsibility of that ILLEGAL ACT. I forget the commission’s name, but LK Advani, Murali Manohar Joshi and others were interrogated by it.
If Ram temple has to be built EXACTLY AT the disputed site, then members of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha should first vote to declare that it is “no longer a disputed site”. Which would mean that they should first vote to:
1) wind up that commission, close down all cases pertaining to that illegal act
2) amend the constitution to remove the word “secular” from it, and give all matters concerning Hindu religion precedence over all matters concerning other religions.
There is another alternative: it should be proved that there was ONLY ONE Ram Temple in the whole of Ayodhya, and that was demolished by Babar to build a mosque. Because that will then indirectly but strongly prove that THAT SITE must have been THE SITE where lord Ram’s disciples had built a temple because lord Ram was born there, or, at least it was a site of great importance in lord Ram’s life…
This whole exercise initiated by Mr Rakesh Sinha is going to take us nowhere. I have already proffered my humble opinion on this matter before, I think twice, in “comments” on THE PRINT: government should throw all these Hindus and Muslims out of that disputed site, give them lands elsewhere within Ayodhya to build a mosque and a Ram temple to the best of their satisfaction, and on the disputed site itself build a:
RAM–MUHAMMAD NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR THE POOR. How about that?!
Now at last Sinha and others in RSS have got ground level information that the BJP is becoming highly unpopular. hence he and his RSS henchmen have taken to touting the ram mandir as a big issue. It just means that the nation will be wasting time on religion instead of working hard on exports, the CAD, farmers issues and the bank NPAs. If this issue becomes centre stage, our economy is doomed for the next 15 years.
This is a no-brainer. A Ram temple MUST be constructed in Ayodhya, but NOT at the disputed site. Because a “structure” bearing the nameplate of a “mosque” stood at the disputed site, and was pulled down NOT BY PWD OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT but by some unauthorized people without any legal permission.
That’s why a Commission was set up to fix the responsibility of that ILLEGAL ACT. I forget the commission’s name, but LK Advani, Murali Manohar Joshi and others were interrogated by it.
If Ram temple has to be built EXACTLY AT the disputed site, then members of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha should first vote to declare that it is “no longer a disputed site”. Which would mean that they should first vote to:
1) wind up that commission, close down all cases pertaining to that illegal act
2) amend the constitution to remove the word “secular” from it, and give all matters concerning Hindu religion precedence over all matters concerning other religions.
There is another alternative: it should be proved that there was ONLY ONE Ram Temple in the whole of Ayodhya, and that was demolished by Babar to build a mosque. Because that will then indirectly but strongly prove that THAT SITE must have been THE SITE where lord Ram’s disciples had built a temple because lord Ram was born there, or, at least it was a site of great importance in lord Ram’s life…
This whole exercise initiated by Mr Rakesh Sinha is going to take us nowhere. I have already proffered my humble opinion on this matter before, I think twice, in “comments” on THE PRINT: government should throw all these Hindus and Muslims out of that disputed site, give them lands elsewhere within Ayodhya to build a mosque and a Ram temple to the best of their satisfaction, and on the disputed site itself build a:
RAM–MUHAMMAD NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR THE POOR. How about that?!
Now at last Sinha and others in RSS have got ground level information that the BJP is becoming highly unpopular. hence he and his RSS henchmen have taken to touting the ram mandir as a big issue. It just means that the nation will be wasting time on religion instead of working hard on exports, the CAD, farmers issues and the bank NPAs. If this issue becomes centre stage, our economy is doomed for the next 15 years.