Possession of inner and outer courtyard will be handed over to the trustees. Muslim parties to be given a 5-acre plot in Ayodhya, says 5-judge Supreme Court bench.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan had raised an objection to the lawyer for the All India Hindu Mahasabha showing a pictorial map of Lord Ram's birthplace.
Muslim plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case over Babri Masjid demolition have consistently stayed at Asaduddin Owaisi’s house for the course of hearings.
The Supreme Court said Wednesday that it hoped to conclude the day-to-day hearings in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case by 18 October.
Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the lead petitioner and the All India Sunni Waqf Board, told the Supreme Court that he was being put through "torture" in assisting with the case.
Indian sampradayas have to institutionalise their knowledge and boil it down to essentials for transmission and proselytisation if they are to compete with the major Abrahamic sects.
On 4 November 2025, NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member Arun Baroka, noted that WhatsApp and Meta are distinct legal entities.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
In a layman’s eye, this judgement is not worthy of the respect we normally accord (or are expected to accord) to a Supreme Court judgement.
How did the court manage to…” The court upheld the belief of Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the disputed site in Ayodhya.” My father was born only 100 years ago, and not 5000 years ago. Yet, if I go to his village, who will be there from my grandfather’s time to tell me where that family lived when my father was born?
The SC..” also upheld that the mosque was neither abandoned nor seceded by the Muslims.”
Also,… “The fact that there lied a structure beneath the destroyed structure has been established by the ASI. ASI had not established whether temple was demolished to build the mosque.”
In the light of the above, I don’t know how the court could decide that the Central government should build a temple there. Just because the Muslim waqf board has not been able to prove its right over the land does not mean that a Muslim structure did not stand there. We all have seen the photos of a mosque standing there.
If this decision is taken in the interest of peace even if at the cost of Fairplay, then it is a welcome decision. Human lives are more precious than bricks.
In a layman’s eye, this judgement is not worthy of the respect we normally accord (or are expected to accord) to a Supreme Court judgement.
How did the court manage to…” The court upheld the belief of Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the disputed site in Ayodhya.” My father was born only 100 years ago, and not 5000 years ago. Yet, if I go to his village, who will be there from my grandfather’s time to tell me where that family lived when my father was born?
The SC..” also upheld that the mosque was neither abandoned nor seceded by the Muslims.”
Also,… “The fact that there lied a structure beneath the destroyed structure has been established by the ASI. ASI had not established whether temple was demolished to build the mosque.”
In the light of the above, I don’t know how the court could decide that the Central government should build a temple there. Just because the Muslim waqf board has not been able to prove its right over the land does not mean that a Muslim structure did not stand there. We all have seen the photos of a mosque standing there.
If this decision is taken in the interest of peace even if at the cost of Fairplay, then it is a welcome decision. Human lives are more precious than bricks.