Most observers say that the degree of polarisation in the US today is much greater than in the '60s, with the political elite so deeply divided that bridges may be harder to build.
Children of the Bombs, the BBC documentary directed by Ronny Sen, reviewed newspaper reports to claim that 565 children have been killed, injured, or maimed between 1996 and 2024.
Ranjith Sreenivasan was killed in 2021, hours after SDPI’s K.S. Shan. SDPI has questioned why trial in Sreenivasan’s case is over, while suspects in Shan killing are out on bail.
Petitioner says victims facing threats from police, lack of help from state. Calcutta HC asks NHRC, state human rights commission if they can hold inquiry into complaints.
20 arrested so far for the killings of 8 people in Bagtui, Birbhum Monday night, reportedly triggered by the murder of a Trinamool leader, but villagers say they no longer feel safe.
The memory of Partition violence, or Civil War of 1947, has remained operable in two ways – first, in evacuating responsibility, and second, as a form of trauma that has been repeated subsequently.
IPS officers Suman Bala Sahoo, Soumen Mitra and Ranveer Kumar make up the SIT formed by the Calcutta High Court to probe the cases of political violence.
Indian govt officials last month skipped Turkish National Day celebrations in Delhi, in a message to Ankara following its support for Islamabad, particularly during Operation Sindoor.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
They (the American right) have made Charlie Kirk into some kind of idol and are even trying to equate him with Martin Luther King Jr. Also, he has deliberately said very controversial stuff (which has been glossed over in this article). Yes, there are lots of problems with the American left, but trying to blindly pin Charlie’s murder on them is a terrible idea.
I would also like to quote Spencer Cox’s exact words after the killer was apprehended. “For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country. That he was not one of us because we are not like that. But it was one of us.”.
Kirk was as Ezra Klein points out in NYT doing politics the right way. However, Ezra‘s article found dramatic opposition from democratic supporters. Kirk‘s way of promoting free speech might be at least momentarily, the biggest casualty of his passing. It was a phenomenon across universities that students whether they were defeated in debates by Kirk or not that they had come to Openly talk about issues that were previously not OK to talk about the Democrat camp had made universities into echo chambers, where only Democrat views where branded as good and truly American while other views were sullied as extreme right wing and bad for America and not worthy of own debates. Kirk single-handedly changed that I made conservative politics, cool on campuses. Once again he may have in fact begun to eclipse Trump as a potential young conservative voice that might eventually shift the balance of power within the Republican party itself. He supposed reluctance on American blind support for Israel could have been another reason why he was beginning to be seen as a threat. At the moment, when transgender ism had already been pushed aside as a priority by the trumpet administration there was no immediate provocation for assassinating Charlie Kirk. Yet he was sought out by a seemingly left oriented young man with a person stake in transgender freedom. We might never know what the truth behind all this really is.
Kirk had started questioning unflinching American support to Israel – and paid the ultimate price. MAGA cannot be unless they eschew slavish support to the genocidal zionists.
Come on the print, you can do better…..
They (the American right) have made Charlie Kirk into some kind of idol and are even trying to equate him with Martin Luther King Jr. Also, he has deliberately said very controversial stuff (which has been glossed over in this article). Yes, there are lots of problems with the American left, but trying to blindly pin Charlie’s murder on them is a terrible idea.
I would also like to quote Spencer Cox’s exact words after the killer was apprehended. “For the last 33 hours, I had been praying that this person (who murdered Charlie Kirk) was from another country. That he was not one of us because we are not like that. But it was one of us.”.
Kirk was as Ezra Klein points out in NYT doing politics the right way. However, Ezra‘s article found dramatic opposition from democratic supporters. Kirk‘s way of promoting free speech might be at least momentarily, the biggest casualty of his passing. It was a phenomenon across universities that students whether they were defeated in debates by Kirk or not that they had come to Openly talk about issues that were previously not OK to talk about the Democrat camp had made universities into echo chambers, where only Democrat views where branded as good and truly American while other views were sullied as extreme right wing and bad for America and not worthy of own debates. Kirk single-handedly changed that I made conservative politics, cool on campuses. Once again he may have in fact begun to eclipse Trump as a potential young conservative voice that might eventually shift the balance of power within the Republican party itself. He supposed reluctance on American blind support for Israel could have been another reason why he was beginning to be seen as a threat. At the moment, when transgender ism had already been pushed aside as a priority by the trumpet administration there was no immediate provocation for assassinating Charlie Kirk. Yet he was sought out by a seemingly left oriented young man with a person stake in transgender freedom. We might never know what the truth behind all this really is.
Kirk had started questioning unflinching American support to Israel – and paid the ultimate price. MAGA cannot be unless they eschew slavish support to the genocidal zionists.