Dharmesh Sharma has passed some crucial judgments, especially those related to crimes against children and women, while also hearing cases under POCSO Act.
Children should be protected from sexual offences and the Cabinet has approved amendments to various sections of the POCSO Act, said union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.
For an industry globally classified as hazardous, protections such as health insurance and a provident fund for workers are necessities. In Sivakasi, they remain elusive.
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Indigenisation level will progressively increase up to 60 percent with key sub-assemblies, electronics and mechanical parts being manufactured locally.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
One of the most biased and whimsical judges. A judge who accuses husband of rape is considered great whereas family court judges who conduct fair trial are considered bad. Dharmesh Sharma has political connections. His judgments only reflect of inability to deal with children and family matters.
In my own case I had to withdraw case from Dharmesh Sharma due to undue favours being shown to woman side. He called the child in chambers and did not even know how to speak to a minor child. The child was made to cry . His understanding of family disputes is completely prejudiced and against the principles of law.
CJI has not chosen him but Dharmesh has been recommended by Bar and DLSA.
Neena Bansal Krishna would have been the right choice for this case.
Can you please shed some light with references to the cases. Can you share your case title, this can help me in fighting against his biased mindset. I am currently filing an appeal concerning the guardian ship case mishandled by Mr. Dharmesh Sharma
I’d recommend such a guy to be made as the principal secretary of the law ministry… They can bring back the lost trust in the law of the land.
Such judges who come from limited competitive exams like the public service commission are obviously more learned than the lawyers who get direct entry into higher judiciary. Shetty Pay Commission made possible for judges below high court level to make decent living which was impossible before due to extremely low pay. So, more judges from lower judiciary needs to be included and promotes to higher judiciary than lawyers who come by currying favours (sometimes) and not always on basis of their talent.
It’s really heartening to know that even today such Judges are present in courts, and because of such people , we still have faith in judiciary. Govt must pay descent amount of salary , allowances etc, to such positions ,, so that they can maintain standards in society , commensurate to their position and status . Respect to such people!!! And cudoes to CJI , to select such honest person for the job.
One of the most biased and whimsical judges. A judge who accuses husband of rape is considered great whereas family court judges who conduct fair trial are considered bad. Dharmesh Sharma has political connections. His judgments only reflect of inability to deal with children and family matters.
In my own case I had to withdraw case from Dharmesh Sharma due to undue favours being shown to woman side. He called the child in chambers and did not even know how to speak to a minor child. The child was made to cry . His understanding of family disputes is completely prejudiced and against the principles of law.
CJI has not chosen him but Dharmesh has been recommended by Bar and DLSA.
Neena Bansal Krishna would have been the right choice for this case.
Can you please shed some light with references to the cases. Can you share your case title, this can help me in fighting against his biased mindset. I am currently filing an appeal concerning the guardian ship case mishandled by Mr. Dharmesh Sharma
I’d recommend such a guy to be made as the principal secretary of the law ministry… They can bring back the lost trust in the law of the land.
Such judges who come from limited competitive exams like the public service commission are obviously more learned than the lawyers who get direct entry into higher judiciary. Shetty Pay Commission made possible for judges below high court level to make decent living which was impossible before due to extremely low pay. So, more judges from lower judiciary needs to be included and promotes to higher judiciary than lawyers who come by currying favours (sometimes) and not always on basis of their talent.
It’s really heartening to know that even today such Judges are present in courts, and because of such people , we still have faith in judiciary. Govt must pay descent amount of salary , allowances etc, to such positions ,, so that they can maintain standards in society , commensurate to their position and status . Respect to such people!!! And cudoes to CJI , to select such honest person for the job.