I’ve been told that few people really care about the no-dating-at-office rule. Dating in 2025 is an actual threat to life, so a threat to career is practically a minor inconvenience.
Employees at Twitter, TCS and Facebook can indefinitely work remotely. And those turning up at offices are keeping masks and sanitisers close, distance from each other.
When a woman menstruates, when/if she decides to marry, when/if she decides to have kids, should not be factors when looking at a woman’s potential from a hiring standpoint.
The Nirouyeh Vijeh Pasdaran Velayat, or NOPO, was the only force Ali Khamenei trusted.It was founded in 1991 and is more feared than the Revolutionary Guards.
Rating democracies is a tricky business. I am only using the simple metric of who in the Indian subcontinent has had the most peaceful, stable, normal political transitions and continuity.
Office “romances” are just ways to get laid outside of marriage. A few, especially women, also use this as a convenient way to work up the management chain. When the quid pro quo does not deliver the expected returns, the woman can easily file a case of PoSH and destroy the man.
Having watched a few cases of PoSH proceedings at my workplace, am pretty convinced that the man’s version of events is always assumed to be a bunch of lies. Even witness testimonies which match the man’s version of events are considered suspect.
The damage to career and reputation is permanent.
Women use workplace romance as a way to walk up the management ladder. Usually this is the path of least resistance and maximum returns.
Also, if the man involved does not give the agreed upon rating and increments, the woman can simply file a case of PoSH case and ruin the man’s career and personal reputation.
Office “romances” are just ways to get laid outside of marriage. A few, especially women, also use this as a convenient way to work up the management chain. When the quid pro quo does not deliver the expected returns, the woman can easily file a case of PoSH and destroy the man.
Having watched a few cases of PoSH proceedings at my workplace, am pretty convinced that the man’s version of events is always assumed to be a bunch of lies. Even witness testimonies which match the man’s version of events are considered suspect.
The damage to career and reputation is permanent.
Women use workplace romance as a way to walk up the management ladder. Usually this is the path of least resistance and maximum returns.
Also, if the man involved does not give the agreed upon rating and increments, the woman can simply file a case of PoSH case and ruin the man’s career and personal reputation.
Cringe is Ms. Ratan Priya’s defining identity now. That’s what makes her so yuck.