Modi, facing flak for claiming that clouds hamper radar efficiency, also revealed to News Nation that the Navy performed manoeuvres before the Balakot air raid.
First submarine, according to RFP, must be delivered 7 yrs after contract signing with 45% indigenous content, followed by one each year until programme reaches 60% localisation.
The India-South Africa series-defining fact is the catastrophic decline of Indian red ball cricket where a visiting team can mock us with the 'grovel' word.
We are indians and need not worry about foreign medias beyond certain point.
I fully support the anchor and what he uttered was the fact. Why should we be neutral to the anti nationals supporting Pak and in favour of tukde when they are fed by common man money. They are Namak Haraam.
I AM WITH THE INDIAN ANCHOR HERE.
HE HAS THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT HIS PROGRAM THE WAY HE LIKES
If you don’t like it, you don’t watch it.
If his employers don’t like his style,
they ought to fire him.
If the interviewee doesn’t like it,
he must not come on programs like this.
And if viewers don’t like him,
they should not watch his program.
However, overseas journalists have no business
passing snide remarks on Indian journalism.
The journalists in the West do not exactly
cover themselves with glory when it comes to
integrity and journalistic ethics.
At least, the outburst from this Indian journalist
was spontaneous, honest, heart-felt — not scripted.
Journalists from the BBC and other Western Media
commenting upon the performance of the Indian anchor
is nothing but smug, lowdown, hypocrisy.
At best it can be described as
the pot calling the kettle black.
Dear Gurpreet , I think there is the NBA for that , and if Someone is aggressive , the opposite person can answer him with Facts , as they are their for debate .
This was the viewpoint of Mr. Chaurasia , and please don’t glorify foreign media , the Media is same everywhere , whether it be india , ameica , europe or anywehere else.
We are indians and need not worry about foreign medias beyond certain point.
I fully support the anchor and what he uttered was the fact. Why should we be neutral to the anti nationals supporting Pak and in favour of tukde when they are fed by common man money. They are Namak Haraam.
Except The Hindu, Indian express to certain extent and NDTV most of Indian Media ate propaganda Machines of Bharathya Janata Party.Sunil
I AM WITH THE INDIAN ANCHOR HERE.
HE HAS THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT HIS PROGRAM THE WAY HE LIKES
If you don’t like it, you don’t watch it.
If his employers don’t like his style,
they ought to fire him.
If the interviewee doesn’t like it,
he must not come on programs like this.
And if viewers don’t like him,
they should not watch his program.
However, overseas journalists have no business
passing snide remarks on Indian journalism.
The journalists in the West do not exactly
cover themselves with glory when it comes to
integrity and journalistic ethics.
At least, the outburst from this Indian journalist
was spontaneous, honest, heart-felt — not scripted.
Journalists from the BBC and other Western Media
commenting upon the performance of the Indian anchor
is nothing but smug, lowdown, hypocrisy.
At best it can be described as
the pot calling the kettle black.
I strongly undeterred support news anchor Mr Chourasiya .being nationalist now days a crime. He has strong guts to put correct picture to t viewers.
These kinds of jokers bring shame to India. There should be an authority to keep a check on them and revoke their so-called journalism degree.
Dear Gurpreet , I think there is the NBA for that , and if Someone is aggressive , the opposite person can answer him with Facts , as they are their for debate .
This was the viewpoint of Mr. Chaurasia , and please don’t glorify foreign media , the Media is same everywhere , whether it be india , ameica , europe or anywehere else.