Anil Murty of SIFF argues that like in the feminist space, within ‘meninism’ there are different schools of thought. SIFF, for instance, does not identify with incels, Andrew Tate followers.
Agricultural policy has prioritised price stabilisation over fostering long-term competitiveness. This incentivises the pursuit of subsidies rather than productivity enhancement.
Naidu’s summit brings in MoUs on same scale as Jagan’s, but CM says his plans built on speed, certainty & investor trust, with escrow accounts, simplified incentives & real-time oversight.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
Now no single men’s rights activist will ce to call or out… Since it’s not some Atul Subhas… Itf it was asn then everyone would have started blaming ” modern feminism”… But since it’s a woman, none is blaming any modern men’s rights activism… When something bad happens to men it’s feminism’s fault but…when something happens to women, nown is man enough to come out and call put their BS pseudo men’s rights activism spewing venom against women in the name of men’s rights and blah blah blah…and suddenly it ” not all men”… And they want us to believe…what hypocrisy…now we can definitely see and admit that men’s rights activism is a joke… They have anything but men’s issues in mind , men’s rights activism is only used as a weapon against feminism or women in general only to sabotage women empowerment and defending and retaining male supremacy…. Mens rights activism is nothing but an active attack to feminism and women…it has sole purpose to propagate misogyny contributing to direct or indirect violence against women…that’s it… There is absolutely no issue they have actually regarding ” men’s rights”… Look at their social media pages and any ignorant person too can confirm what I am saying… No brainer ….
Indian males are the most evil … It’s high time we recognise it and stop saying ” not all men’..
Women on quora who defend or sympathise with men’s rights nonsense, are shameless enough to contribute to such violence against their fellow women..
It’s just one case I am talking about… There are millions are happening every day…
Now i understand, why Atul Subhas case or muskan Rastogi case was headlines but not more than 6000 much more gruesome cases till then to now against women by men aren’t… because cases against men by women are so rare and hence not even normalised in nightmares ,that when those happen it makes headlines..but cases against women by men are so vehemently rampant and hence normalised beyond savagery that people take it for granted like everyday breakfast, lunch, dinner etc…and normalised things doesn’t make headlines anymore as such… because then news media will have nothing else to show except men’s violence against women….
But men’s rights activists will bark shamelessly demanding ” gender neutral laws” for highly gendered crimes against women… And keep distorting the whole statistics of so called ” fake accusation against men “… While 90% above cases against women of all types of violence aren’t even reported and the conviction rate of r@pe crimes is shamefully low… Hardly women get justice for majority of real cases ..and those cases which doesn’t have ” substantial evidence” and are withdrawn by the victims are also automatically deemed as ” false accusations”… That’s our judiciary…
OUR JUDICIARY AND INDIAN MEN ARE KILLING WOMEN ACTIVELY , HAND IN HAND..
We already know that SC has ruled that marital rape isn’t a crime…
And indian men have full right to file to file divorce if the wife doesn’t wanna stay with his parents, but absolutely no such support for the woman’s parents because it’s our traditional value that the wife will leave her parents to join the in laws but not the vice versa…
Men only support equality when it comes to sharing financial responsibility 50/50… But they want to keep rest of the things *traditional*.. men are the worst kind of hypocrites in india…
Pre-nuptial agreements are the solution to this issue. Every marriage must be preceded by a PNA. The groom/husband must insist on one.
In today’s world, as far as the Indian middle class ic concerned, both the spouses are financially independent. Hence, questions like alimony should not even arise in the first place.
Also, such yellow journalism was not expected of Mr. Deep Halder. Mr. Halder is known for high quality journalism and erudition, especially over Bangladeshi politics and society.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DKVniztzZkp/?img_index=6&igsh=MXJnM3Z5bmY3Y25leg==
Now no single men’s rights activist will ce to call or out… Since it’s not some Atul Subhas… Itf it was asn then everyone would have started blaming ” modern feminism”… But since it’s a woman, none is blaming any modern men’s rights activism… When something bad happens to men it’s feminism’s fault but…when something happens to women, nown is man enough to come out and call put their BS pseudo men’s rights activism spewing venom against women in the name of men’s rights and blah blah blah…and suddenly it ” not all men”… And they want us to believe…what hypocrisy…now we can definitely see and admit that men’s rights activism is a joke… They have anything but men’s issues in mind , men’s rights activism is only used as a weapon against feminism or women in general only to sabotage women empowerment and defending and retaining male supremacy…. Mens rights activism is nothing but an active attack to feminism and women…it has sole purpose to propagate misogyny contributing to direct or indirect violence against women…that’s it… There is absolutely no issue they have actually regarding ” men’s rights”… Look at their social media pages and any ignorant person too can confirm what I am saying… No brainer ….
Indian males are the most evil … It’s high time we recognise it and stop saying ” not all men’..
Women on quora who defend or sympathise with men’s rights nonsense, are shameless enough to contribute to such violence against their fellow women..
It’s just one case I am talking about… There are millions are happening every day…
Now i understand, why Atul Subhas case or muskan Rastogi case was headlines but not more than 6000 much more gruesome cases till then to now against women by men aren’t… because cases against men by women are so rare and hence not even normalised in nightmares ,that when those happen it makes headlines..but cases against women by men are so vehemently rampant and hence normalised beyond savagery that people take it for granted like everyday breakfast, lunch, dinner etc…and normalised things doesn’t make headlines anymore as such… because then news media will have nothing else to show except men’s violence against women….
But men’s rights activists will bark shamelessly demanding ” gender neutral laws” for highly gendered crimes against women… And keep distorting the whole statistics of so called ” fake accusation against men “… While 90% above cases against women of all types of violence aren’t even reported and the conviction rate of r@pe crimes is shamefully low… Hardly women get justice for majority of real cases ..and those cases which doesn’t have ” substantial evidence” and are withdrawn by the victims are also automatically deemed as ” false accusations”… That’s our judiciary…
OUR JUDICIARY AND INDIAN MEN ARE KILLING WOMEN ACTIVELY , HAND IN HAND..
We already know that SC has ruled that marital rape isn’t a crime…
And indian men have full right to file to file divorce if the wife doesn’t wanna stay with his parents, but absolutely no such support for the woman’s parents because it’s our traditional value that the wife will leave her parents to join the in laws but not the vice versa…
Men only support equality when it comes to sharing financial responsibility 50/50… But they want to keep rest of the things *traditional*.. men are the worst kind of hypocrites in india…
Pre-nuptial agreements are the solution to this issue. Every marriage must be preceded by a PNA. The groom/husband must insist on one.
In today’s world, as far as the Indian middle class ic concerned, both the spouses are financially independent. Hence, questions like alimony should not even arise in the first place.
Also, such yellow journalism was not expected of Mr. Deep Halder. Mr. Halder is known for high quality journalism and erudition, especially over Bangladeshi politics and society.