Six of 10 charges against ousted CBI chief Alok Verma were unsubstantiated and 4 needed further investigation, Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge had argued.
The veteran Congress leader has reportedly questioned the appointment of three people who are supposed to help him strengthen the party in Maharashtra.
Top court was mulling contempt proceedings against the govt for its failure to implement Lokpal Act last week, it was told that a key meeting has been proposed.
The political trajectory is clear. Asim Munir is now prepared to convict and sentence Imran Khan for instigating a rebellion against the army chief, with no possibility of mercy.
Report looks at imbalance between equity & corporate bond markets amid India’s growth ambitions and diverse capital needs, while outlining strategy to unlock full potential.
Of the total package, $649 million will be utilised for additional hardware, software, and support services, and the remaining for Major Defence Equipment (MDE).
None of Pakistan’s PMs has lasted 5 years. That the current PM has given Asim Munir 5 years shows that of all military dictatorships history has seen, Pakistan’s is most creative.
Kharge, representing Congress, objected vehemently when the panel selected Verma in the first place. Now, he is objecting to Verma’s “Transfer”. He fails to note that even if the charges of the CVC against Verma are NOT YET substantiated, a person carrying such serious allegations against him, from such a high body as the CVC, cannot hold the post of the CBI’s Director. The CVC has put all this in writing, and this is not like some vague, anonymous complaint. UNTIL the charges are cleared or confirmed, there is no way Mr Verma can hold the post of Director CBI. The Government is right and is also fully supported by the Supreme Court Judge in the panel. Is Kharge implying that the Judge is also biased and is hence supporting the government? They are just making noises to justify their own assumptions and innuendos against Modi.
Pronouncing someone guilty on unsubstantiated charges is bad enough. It reeks of vendetta and lawless thinking. But to do so at lightning speed also reeks of fear and paranoia! What is Mr Modi so apprehensive about that Alok Verma might have done if he had stayed on even for a day more?
Kharge, representing Congress, objected vehemently when the panel selected Verma in the first place. Now, he is objecting to Verma’s “Transfer”. He fails to note that even if the charges of the CVC against Verma are NOT YET substantiated, a person carrying such serious allegations against him, from such a high body as the CVC, cannot hold the post of the CBI’s Director. The CVC has put all this in writing, and this is not like some vague, anonymous complaint. UNTIL the charges are cleared or confirmed, there is no way Mr Verma can hold the post of Director CBI. The Government is right and is also fully supported by the Supreme Court Judge in the panel. Is Kharge implying that the Judge is also biased and is hence supporting the government? They are just making noises to justify their own assumptions and innuendos against Modi.
Pronouncing someone guilty on unsubstantiated charges is bad enough. It reeks of vendetta and lawless thinking. But to do so at lightning speed also reeks of fear and paranoia! What is Mr Modi so apprehensive about that Alok Verma might have done if he had stayed on even for a day more?
Why did the nominee of the CJI agree with the removal? Was there true merit in his removal for nominee to approve the removal?