Rejecting the anticipatory bail plea of a BJP leader, Madras High Court said the social media posts of public figures had the potential to sway public opinion.
The Tamil Nadu government had in May ordered the Vedanta copper plant in Tuticorin to be closed after locals protested to it claiming it was polluting the area.
For an industry globally classified as hazardous, protections such as health insurance and a provident fund for workers are necessities. In Sivakasi, they remain elusive.
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Indigenisation level will progressively increase up to 60 percent with key sub-assemblies, electronics and mechanical parts being manufactured locally.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
Even if forwarding a message means endorsing it, does endorsement equal to perpetration of a crime?
I could for eg. endorse the assassination of a criminal like dawood,. Would it be equivalent to being the assassin?
I think such a judgement needs to be challenged vigorously! Also there are many times that people forward messages which they do not endorse and might even be outraged that such messages are circulating! How can the courts judge intention? Is not Freedom of expression of opinion being imposed on individuals by courts in their private and personal circle?
Even if forwarding a message means endorsing it, does endorsement equal to perpetration of a crime?
I could for eg. endorse the assassination of a criminal like dawood,. Would it be equivalent to being the assassin?
I think such a judgement needs to be challenged vigorously! Also there are many times that people forward messages which they do not endorse and might even be outraged that such messages are circulating! How can the courts judge intention? Is not Freedom of expression of opinion being imposed on individuals by courts in their private and personal circle?