The Supreme Court collegium’s decision to transfer Delhi High Court judge S. Muralidhar to the Punjab and Haryana High Court has met with strong opposition from the Delhi High Court Bar Association.
Naidu attempts to shield aqua farmers after Trump’s tariff hits the shrimp farming sector in Andhra Pradesh, leading to the cancellation of 50% of the state's exports.
Company builds microsatellites that are smaller, faster, cheaper to produce. ICEYE will develop & launch micro-satellites, hand them over to India, which will have full control & sovereignty.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
The transfer of judge is incidental to his job. We must see as to whether Justice Murlidhar is happy or not. He is being sent here as first puisne Judge in Punjab and haryana high court. In delhi he us at number 3. He is now at no.2. We must respect the decision of the Government.
My best wishes to Hon’ble Mr.Justice Murlidhar.
This pleasing personality will give fragrance where ever he will go.
Best of luck sir.
Regards.
The protests are everywhere. Can there ever be a decision which will be acceptable to all ? That is why we have systems which have to be implemented by someone. When we decide to question and protest every decision that is anarchy.
If a judge goes from place A to place B, and if he is good will the place B not benefit. Why the benefit must come to place A only ? Someone has to take a call on the suitability of such excellent judge at place or place B. There is such an authority in place. When the reasons are asked for such decisions the motives also come in question.
The arguments of ‘guru-bhais’, appears quite out of place. If we do not want the politicians not to meddle in matters of Judiciary , Bar must also refrain from commenting, well meaning comments could tag the up-right and excellent judges with unnecessary controversies.
It is the lawyers practising in a particular Court who have the best assessment of the caliber and integrity of the honourable Judges. If they are collectively expressing concern, there must be cogent reasons for doing so. At a time when institutions are seeing wear and tear, transparency is valuable . That should include the respected Collegium as well.
The transfer of judge is incidental to his job. We must see as to whether Justice Murlidhar is happy or not. He is being sent here as first puisne Judge in Punjab and haryana high court. In delhi he us at number 3. He is now at no.2. We must respect the decision of the Government.
My best wishes to Hon’ble Mr.Justice Murlidhar.
This pleasing personality will give fragrance where ever he will go.
Best of luck sir.
Regards.
The protests are everywhere. Can there ever be a decision which will be acceptable to all ? That is why we have systems which have to be implemented by someone. When we decide to question and protest every decision that is anarchy.
If a judge goes from place A to place B, and if he is good will the place B not benefit. Why the benefit must come to place A only ? Someone has to take a call on the suitability of such excellent judge at place or place B. There is such an authority in place. When the reasons are asked for such decisions the motives also come in question.
The arguments of ‘guru-bhais’, appears quite out of place. If we do not want the politicians not to meddle in matters of Judiciary , Bar must also refrain from commenting, well meaning comments could tag the up-right and excellent judges with unnecessary controversies.
It is the lawyers practising in a particular Court who have the best assessment of the caliber and integrity of the honourable Judges. If they are collectively expressing concern, there must be cogent reasons for doing so. At a time when institutions are seeing wear and tear, transparency is valuable . That should include the respected Collegium as well.