Today, Vaisakhi is celebrated with langar, processions, and fairs. But its real spirit lies in asking ourselves: Are we still brave enough to become Khalsa?
An SC ruling has ended years of political wrangling in Punjab. Congress says move would ruin Khalsa College's heritage status. Akalis accuse Congress of politicising education.
SC said it did not wish to go into allegations of mala fides in case & looked at two questions to rule that Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017, was ‘arbitrary, violated Article 14’.
Student’s lawyer says attackers wanted their candidates to win DU elections unopposed & tried to stop his client from filing nomination papers for his batchmates. Accused is absconding.
The movement for ‘Bandi Singhs’ started in the state in 2013, when the demand was first raised to release Sikh militants who had been languishing in jail for years.
What should be of concern is other states following suit and enacting separate laws to suit the political environment of respective states citing the Punjab bill as a precedent.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
BJP has no dynastic succession, at least not at the top. You can trace this back to Vajpayee-Advani era. This act of spotting, empowering younger talent is even more striking with the choice of BJP presidents.
Banal article written with chatgpt and full of brahmin hatred. He waxes eloquent about Khalsa panth without mentioning who exactly was Opressor and who were they fighting against. Truth wouldn’t suit his Leftist ,Hindu hating agenda. Hence Brahminical patriarchy.
Why do these people get representation in The Print is beyond reasoning. I mean if you assume The Print is a a reasonable publication.
What a pseudo narrative!! Sikism came about with first born boys from the farm lands. It also included Khatri and brahmin boys. It was a social movement to begin with. Mostly against Muslim aristocracy. So what spin are we trying to portray here…
I glanced through the article. Except for one paragraph, the subject header and content barely match. This is misleading. I also wonder how Sikh Dalits and ex-Sikh Dalits, now Christian, will react to the claims.
Is that so, Mr. Singh and Ms. Kaur?
For a change why don’t you rise up against Islamic radicalism? Or initiate a spiritual revolution against Islamic fundamentalism?
Don’t see the havoc caused across the world by Islamic Jihadi terrorism?
Banal article written with chatgpt and full of brahmin hatred. He waxes eloquent about Khalsa panth without mentioning who exactly was Opressor and who were they fighting against. Truth wouldn’t suit his Leftist ,Hindu hating agenda. Hence Brahminical patriarchy.
Why do these people get representation in The Print is beyond reasoning. I mean if you assume The Print is a a reasonable publication.
What a pseudo narrative!! Sikism came about with first born boys from the farm lands. It also included Khatri and brahmin boys. It was a social movement to begin with. Mostly against Muslim aristocracy. So what spin are we trying to portray here…
I glanced through the article. Except for one paragraph, the subject header and content barely match. This is misleading. I also wonder how Sikh Dalits and ex-Sikh Dalits, now Christian, will react to the claims.
Is that so, Mr. Singh and Ms. Kaur?
For a change why don’t you rise up against Islamic radicalism? Or initiate a spiritual revolution against Islamic fundamentalism?
Don’t see the havoc caused across the world by Islamic Jihadi terrorism?