Move to put archaeologist Ramkrishna's report on ASI website comes after it became Centre vs Tamil Nadu issue. ASI wanted changes, Stalin said Centre was undermining Tamil heritage.
Despite multiple agencies being involved, the US could maintain a clear chain of command. This is something India should consider too, as it defines the theatre command structures.
The latest comment comes as New Delhi and Washington have yet to sign a trade agreement. India’s purchase of Russian oil has reduced, but Moscow remains top source for crude.
Venezuela also boasts of a diverse portfolio of unmanned aerial vehicles capable of carrying out surveillance, reconnaissance and being employed for kinetic purposes as well.
Many of you might think I got something so wrong in National Interest pieces written this year. I might disagree! But some deserve a Mea Culpa. I’d deal with the most recent this week.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.