Move to put archaeologist Ramkrishna's report on ASI website comes after it became Centre vs Tamil Nadu issue. ASI wanted changes, Stalin said Centre was undermining Tamil heritage.
The Economic Survey 2025-26 is not a celebration of success, but a measured warning that the traditional paradigms of global economic growth are no longer applicable.
The IT services sector contributed more than half of India’s Gross Value Added, serving as a major driver of exports and employment, the Economic Survey 2025-26 has found.
Shield AI will provide V-BAT vertical takeoff & landing drones along with licences for software, which will be integrated into aircraft and made available to select Indian partners.
No nation other than China can negotiate one-on-one with Trump on an equal footing. That’s why the middle powers who so far formed the core of multilateral bodies now feel orphaned.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.