Kamal Nath, on his first day as Madhya Pradesh chief minister, announced incentives for industries that hire 70 per cent local workers. When questioned...
In May 1974, RSS chief Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras spoke at a lecture series in Pune about caste-based discrimination and social equality within the Hindu fold.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
1. Fact remains that political parties in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and perhaps Odisha, and political leaders like Shri Akhilesh yadav, have consistently refused to accept ground reality. Ground reality is that there is migration of the poor from their respective states. 2. Politicians in states where migration is taking place see it as a migrants’ problem. Is it a problem or an opportunity? It is true that so called problem created by the migrating workers has arisen because leaders of political parties, when in power, have not properly utilised resources available for development. In fact these politicians have spent public money (meant for development projects) on populist schemes to secure votes. Further, in these states, natural resources like fertile land remain poorly utilised as farm productivity is low. 3. No serious efforts have been made to create jobs for the rural poor in these states (and of course in many other states). Solution lies in facing the problem of migration in right perspective. Why then blame others for it?
1. Fact remains that political parties in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and perhaps Odisha, and political leaders like Shri Akhilesh yadav, have consistently refused to accept ground reality. Ground reality is that there is migration of the poor from their respective states. 2. Politicians in states where migration is taking place see it as a migrants’ problem. Is it a problem or an opportunity? It is true that so called problem created by the migrating workers has arisen because leaders of political parties, when in power, have not properly utilised resources available for development. In fact these politicians have spent public money (meant for development projects) on populist schemes to secure votes. Further, in these states, natural resources like fertile land remain poorly utilised as farm productivity is low. 3. No serious efforts have been made to create jobs for the rural poor in these states (and of course in many other states). Solution lies in facing the problem of migration in right perspective. Why then blame others for it?