Biden’s speech at the Democratic National Convention — the most important of his nearly half-century in politics — set the tone for a bruising general election battle.
Biden received the 2,374 delegate votes necessary for nomination at a convention that was restyled in the time of Covid into a video tour across the US.
The Democratic National convention, which opened Monday, showcased affirmations for the party's presidential nominee Joe Biden from progressives, centrists and even Republicans.
During a string of mini-rallies to counter the Democrats’ convention, Trump painted Biden as an existential threat to the US and made a series of misleading claims to make his point.
With 77 days to US presidential election, Democrats and Republicans will kick off their national conventions this week. However, it's no surprise who will be formally elected as candidates.
US Presidential nominee Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris released their campaign document, outlining the main contours of their policy towards India.
Addressing the Indian-American community, Biden said he will also work on expanding two-way trade between the countries and spoke on the 'harmful' actions on H-1B visas.
Set up by Lal bahadur Shastri, the Santhanam Committee's key concern was that corruption, once limited to the lower rungs of the bureaucracy, had now infected the All India Services and political leadership.
In the latest budget, the FDI limit was increased to 100 percent, but most foreign companies are not buying such large stakes in the Indian insurance sector.
Modi government had also made numerous efforts to establish peace with Pakistan but has now adopted a different path, militarily, to establish peace, adds defence minister.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
This man forgot India is a democracy. Turkey is fundamentally Islamic which does not care about other faiths. Even today also Hindus can not enter some areas even in India. Turkey is purely Islamic where only muslims like ameer Khan enjoy perfect freedom. This man should think all this before commenting.
Rachman’s observation on India-China-US centric world politics is very very correct. Comparison of Erdagon with Modi in so far their respective domestic politics are concerned is also correct. Regarding Biden in the event of winning US election and his relation, as President of the US, with Modi, what Rachman says is a possibility. As both Modi and Obama had good personal relation, Biden, a Obama camp follower, joining Modi bandwagon in world politics can’t be ruled out. China’s President Xi Jinping has done so much damage to world trust that no politician worth their salt will dare to join Xi and China bandwagon in world politics. So US has no option other than Modi, who has another 4 years as PM, to join with in Asian geopolitics. Though there is some domestic political taint on Modi image, his overall image as a classic politicians who matters in world politics is still intact.
It is not a good assessment as for as Turkey and India concerned in the religious issue. He is wrong with facts and suffers from poor ground work. Erdogan hijacked a pre- Islamic church making it a mosque. Modi got the buried Hindu temple back from the barbarian onslaught proving the presence of temple in the top court. Modi also allotted land for mosque. But Erdogan has not given any place for a church and he is wrong to convert a church into mosque which is against Isalm which he practices. So Erdogan, like many muslim rulers before him, is a bully pandering to jihadi politics. Comparison itself is a stupid thing. But it is a deliberate question by anti-Modi gang in India expecting a white man to endorse their view not Indian people’s view.
Generally, Rachman’s opinions are fair unlike that of typical American journalists. But his comparison of Hagia Sophia with Ram Temple is wrong. Temple is being built after due process of law and after fully hearing the pro-mosque parties, by the highest court of the largest democracy. It wasn’t done by executive decree or law of parliament.
The Indian response has been to both talk and mobilise troops. However, not use of force, as happened in Kargil. So it is unclear how China has “ underestimated the strength of the Indian reaction “. The other theory, that President Xi has done this as a diversion for a domestic audience also does not stand up to scrutiny. These border developments are not being covered as extensively in the Chinese media as they are in ours. A long period of reticence, denial of intrusions, the ferocity seen with Pakistan has been altogether absent. A new power dynamic is being demonstrated to the world without having to fight a war.
This man forgot India is a democracy. Turkey is fundamentally Islamic which does not care about other faiths. Even today also Hindus can not enter some areas even in India. Turkey is purely Islamic where only muslims like ameer Khan enjoy perfect freedom. This man should think all this before commenting.
Rachman’s observation on India-China-US centric world politics is very very correct. Comparison of Erdagon with Modi in so far their respective domestic politics are concerned is also correct. Regarding Biden in the event of winning US election and his relation, as President of the US, with Modi, what Rachman says is a possibility. As both Modi and Obama had good personal relation, Biden, a Obama camp follower, joining Modi bandwagon in world politics can’t be ruled out. China’s President Xi Jinping has done so much damage to world trust that no politician worth their salt will dare to join Xi and China bandwagon in world politics. So US has no option other than Modi, who has another 4 years as PM, to join with in Asian geopolitics. Though there is some domestic political taint on Modi image, his overall image as a classic politicians who matters in world politics is still intact.
It is not a good assessment as for as Turkey and India concerned in the religious issue. He is wrong with facts and suffers from poor ground work. Erdogan hijacked a pre- Islamic church making it a mosque. Modi got the buried Hindu temple back from the barbarian onslaught proving the presence of temple in the top court. Modi also allotted land for mosque. But Erdogan has not given any place for a church and he is wrong to convert a church into mosque which is against Isalm which he practices. So Erdogan, like many muslim rulers before him, is a bully pandering to jihadi politics. Comparison itself is a stupid thing. But it is a deliberate question by anti-Modi gang in India expecting a white man to endorse their view not Indian people’s view.
Generally, Rachman’s opinions are fair unlike that of typical American journalists. But his comparison of Hagia Sophia with Ram Temple is wrong. Temple is being built after due process of law and after fully hearing the pro-mosque parties, by the highest court of the largest democracy. It wasn’t done by executive decree or law of parliament.
The Indian response has been to both talk and mobilise troops. However, not use of force, as happened in Kargil. So it is unclear how China has “ underestimated the strength of the Indian reaction “. The other theory, that President Xi has done this as a diversion for a domestic audience also does not stand up to scrutiny. These border developments are not being covered as extensively in the Chinese media as they are in ours. A long period of reticence, denial of intrusions, the ferocity seen with Pakistan has been altogether absent. A new power dynamic is being demonstrated to the world without having to fight a war.