The central theme emerging from Chinese online discourse is that while Trump may now acknowledge China’s strength and treat it as an equal, this recognition is driven more by fear and strategic anxiety than by genuine intent for collaboration.
Once seen as a fading presence on India’s investment & startup picture, the state is slowly moving up the ladder, with policy reforms & infrastructure building.
Agreement signed during 17th Joint Working Group (JWG) on defence cooperation. Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh met Director General in Israeli Ministry of Defence Amir Baram Tuesday.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
‘As we express our gratitude for the saints of indian soil , we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them, as being proved time to time may, be any one of our great saints like, ved vyas ji, kashyap ji, dadhichi ji, Balmiki ji, Garg muni, Parshuram ji, Durvasa rishi, Sandipani rishi, Adi shankaracharya ji , kabir, surdas ji , Tulsidas ji, Rahim, Rasakhan , Meera bai , Vivekanand ji , sai leela shah ji , and Asaramji, sri sri ravishankar ji , all are doing the similar acts for real prosperity and uplifting of human values in the society. Go through the record unbiased you will find a lot.
?’
for crying out loud, could everyone reading this think about whether they would like the situation described in the article to continue? if not, every person who is not raping another person with their eyes should be arresting that behaviour and any extension of it every moment. every female who has lived in india, and ever stepped out of an environment in which the demeanour of men is exemplary, has likely been assaulted in some manner and should not be required to respond to the behaviour of people who threaten her. in the normal world that presently does not exist, assault does not occur. in the abnormal world that exists, assault can only be addressed by starting to institutionalize anyone who assaults another living thing and bail means supervised rehabilitation, visitations and outings.
Although it has little connection to present article, but think what would have been the investigation and judgement if this incident had happened in India?
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.
Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide. He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency.
As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.
“Ordinarily,” Dr Mills continued, “A person, who sets out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide.”
That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun.
The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window striking Mr. Opus.
When one intends to kill subject “A” but kills subject “B” in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject “B”.
When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded.
The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, if the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple’s son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.
It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son’s financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn’t actually pull the trigger.
The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist.
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus.
He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother’s murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window.
The son had actually murdered himself, so the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
A true story from Associated Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt
Brilliant – facts are sometimes stranger than fiction!
‘As we express our gratitude for the saints of indian soil , we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them, as being proved time to time may, be any one of our great saints like, ved vyas ji, kashyap ji, dadhichi ji, Balmiki ji, Garg muni, Parshuram ji, Durvasa rishi, Sandipani rishi, Adi shankaracharya ji , kabir, surdas ji , Tulsidas ji, Rahim, Rasakhan , Meera bai , Vivekanand ji , sai leela shah ji , and Asaramji, sri sri ravishankar ji , all are doing the similar acts for real prosperity and uplifting of human values in the society. Go through the record unbiased you will find a lot.
?’
for crying out loud, could everyone reading this think about whether they would like the situation described in the article to continue? if not, every person who is not raping another person with their eyes should be arresting that behaviour and any extension of it every moment. every female who has lived in india, and ever stepped out of an environment in which the demeanour of men is exemplary, has likely been assaulted in some manner and should not be required to respond to the behaviour of people who threaten her. in the normal world that presently does not exist, assault does not occur. in the abnormal world that exists, assault can only be addressed by starting to institutionalize anyone who assaults another living thing and bail means supervised rehabilitation, visitations and outings.
Although it has little connection to present article, but think what would have been the investigation and judgement if this incident had happened in India?
On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.
Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide. He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency.
As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.
“Ordinarily,” Dr Mills continued, “A person, who sets out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide.”
That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
In the room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun.
The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window striking Mr. Opus.
When one intends to kill subject “A” but kills subject “B” in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject “B”.
When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was unloaded.
The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, if the gun had been accidentally loaded.
The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple’s son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.
It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son’s financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother.
Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder even though he didn’t actually pull the trigger.
The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.
Now comes the exquisite twist.
Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus.
He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother’s murder. This led him to jump off the ten-story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window.
The son had actually murdered himself, so the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
A true story from Associated Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt
Brilliant – facts are sometimes stranger than fiction!
I dont think so there has been a single proof found against Asaram Bapu. Media is misleading people!
This reveals a sorry state of affairs of some of our high courts which are in consequence refuse to stand up to a dignity of a women.