Addressing pro-CAA rally in Gwalior, the UP Chief Minister said left groups had spread lies which need to be countered by conducting an awareness campaigns.
IIMC students last week began an agitation demanding the roll back, which comes at a time the HRD ministry is dealing with an escalating JNU students protest over a similar demand.
A JNU circular cautioned students that they would be ineligible to register in the next semester if they boycotted exams, and will then cease to be bonafide students of the university.A JNU circular cautioned students that they would be ineligible to register in the next semester if they boycotted exams, and will then cease to be bonafide students of the university.
In mouthpiece Saamana, Sena says it was unfortunate that the govt, under the garb of maintaining law and order, is trying to crush all voices of dissent.
Hundreds of JNU students carried out a march Monday, bringing several parts of the capital to a halt. According to the police, nearly 30 personnel and 15 students were injured in the eight-hour protest.
Around 10 companies of police personnel have been deployed outside JNU and at entry points to Parliament as students plan to march in protest of the fee hike.
Report looks at imbalance between equity & corporate bond markets amid India’s growth ambitions and diverse capital needs, while outlining strategy to unlock full potential.
Of the total package, $649 million will be utilised for additional hardware, software, and support services, and the remaining for Major Defence Equipment (MDE).
None of Pakistan’s PMs has lasted 5 years. That the current PM has given Asim Munir 5 years shows that of all military dictatorships history has seen, Pakistan’s is most creative.
This is a two-pronged strategy on AAP’s part – – so I guess. They know that the accusation is so foolish that no harm will come to Kanhaiya Kumar anyways, but the rant will be settled once and for all. Yet, the permission to prosecute may put AAP in the good books of Narendra Modi, at least for some time, to draw some tiny bit of advantage for Delhi.
For once, the judiciary isn’t responsible for the delay. The AAP delayed the entire process by almost 4 years. By the time a case is heard, the witnesses are gone or have been paid off; the investigators have been transferred and the original files have to be discovered and understood. Of course, now it is the turn of judges to delay the case by another 5-10 years. Why can’t we let the cases proceed and be decided?
One would respectfully disagree with Raghav Chadha. Sanction for prosecution should be granted after judicious application of mind. It would become a ritual / formality if the authority took the view that innocence or guilt would be established in a Court of law. The slogans, however hurtful, do not constitute the crime of sedition. No act of armed insurrection resulted from those speeches, quite different from the very drastic outcome of Kapil Sharma’s speech. Something ebony black in the lentils …
This is a two-pronged strategy on AAP’s part – – so I guess. They know that the accusation is so foolish that no harm will come to Kanhaiya Kumar anyways, but the rant will be settled once and for all. Yet, the permission to prosecute may put AAP in the good books of Narendra Modi, at least for some time, to draw some tiny bit of advantage for Delhi.
For once, the judiciary isn’t responsible for the delay. The AAP delayed the entire process by almost 4 years. By the time a case is heard, the witnesses are gone or have been paid off; the investigators have been transferred and the original files have to be discovered and understood. Of course, now it is the turn of judges to delay the case by another 5-10 years. Why can’t we let the cases proceed and be decided?
Sure. Survival next term depends on such act of kindness
Sure. Survival next term depends on such act of kind
One would respectfully disagree with Raghav Chadha. Sanction for prosecution should be granted after judicious application of mind. It would become a ritual / formality if the authority took the view that innocence or guilt would be established in a Court of law. The slogans, however hurtful, do not constitute the crime of sedition. No act of armed insurrection resulted from those speeches, quite different from the very drastic outcome of Kapil Sharma’s speech. Something ebony black in the lentils …