Topic: Jammu and Kashmir

Secularism is not dead…..As long as hinduism is in the majority in this country, it will never be dead…. The western interpretation of secularism is dead… Ram Temple or no temple, it was high time we indians, to be lead by hindus , rediscover ourselves… for far too long we have looked at ourselves through the western interpratations of ourselves…. this had to change…. May be, just may be, the Ram Temple construction will be the spark that will do just that…..

I fully disagree with Yogendra Yadav that Secularism was defeated, as Secularism is India was practised only to appease the Muslims and use them as vote banks for power. When there is unity among Hindus on the thread of nationalism, it is portrayed as defeat of Secularism. As far as contempt of court against a promient lawyer is concerned, that the lawyer thinks he is above the Judge and jury and questions the judgments, castigates the judges and hence the contempt. The same lawyer looks to the apex court for legal remedies. If the SC has refused to stay the CAA bill, it definitely must have done based on merits of the case and material it has on the table, On the contrary, the bill was brought with due saner advice from legal luminaries and therefore, the contempt case and stayal of the bill should never be equated to suspect the judiciary. The very support of Congress for Ram temple construction vindicates the allegation that it was appeasing the Muslims and took the Hindu majority with disdain. thus it is paying the political price, show me an instance of so secularism in danger after the BJP took over. Are Muslims discriminted with government benefits are extended, or they denied employment just because they are Muslims. Why only Muslims are talked about as minorities when, minorities in real sense, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists and Jains… so on and so forth never cry that their existence is threatened by the government decisions. On CAA, is there a provision to ripp the citizenship of Indian Muslims, certainly not. Then how is it justified when Indian Muslims demand justice and asylum for Rohingya Muslims for whose plight India is not at all responsible, and Yogendra Yadav is silent on the displacement of kashmiri pandits. Never an article to relocate them back to state he perceived/conceived to write. Secular was added to the Constitution in 1976 to suit the interests of Congress with whom Yogendra Yadav and his political party (AAP) aligned to gain power in 2013 after fighting with them a fortnight earlier. was it not political expediency? it is case of AAP KARE TO RAAS LILA, AUR HUM KARE TO CHARACTER DILA. The banal sermons of Secularism need to be put to rest.

There is a series of articles against Ayodhya. Intellectuals like you don’t have courtesy to respond to queries posted on article.

Is India the first democratic country to restore a temple or a church? Why is such a hue cry about destruction of a regular mosque? What is secularism- Is it to ignore the wish of atleast 80cr people of this country?

I have spent my entire childhood believing that Ram temple shouldn’t be build. But my stay at modern Europe told me that there is nothing wrong with it.

The author makes exactly the same mistakes he bemoans in his article. Firstly he uses word Minority and avoids saying Muslims. His claim that Kashmir was the only minority state overlooks Punjab which has Sikh majority. All those phrases he uses to express his angst are only the symptoms of what is wrong with secularism. Every court decision, government action which favors Muslims is considered victory of secularism and every thing that expects Muslims to change their thinking with current ethos–not just in India but all over the world– is defeat of secularism. Constitution forced Hindus to give up polygamy, inheritance laws, to accommodate what Nehru thought was “modern”. Even then, people of other religion were exempted from becoming “Modern”. Today, the author will condone slogans against Hindus and India as Freedom of expression. All issues are viewed through this prism. Even Supreme Court order on Ram Janma Bhumi does not deserve any different treatment. The Triple Talak law is another classic example. As a result, Hindus feel Muslims are treated as more privileged than Hindus. This is the tragedy of secularism in India.

Self-realization has started; but clarity is yet to set. Secularism as imagined by the left/Congress/Opposition parties was put on ventillator in 2014 and is waiting to be confirmed by this ecosystem to be dead. However, the real secularism practiced by Hindus is alive and thriving.

Yes, secularism died “because it chose to mock Hinduism”. Good argument by Mr Yadav as always.

Your definition of secularism is flawed to the core.

The last paragraph is on point and one has to be awfully blind not to see this see build-up for so long. The fact that Trump is POTUS, and PM Johnson in England- is just a small preview of much grandiose breeding problem that we are much conveniently tiring our eyes away from- and one day it’ll reset the debates, paradigms and everything in the known polity and idealogues. Speak the truth, or else it’ll eat you. The pathological political correctness has been the single most reason for the marvelous bloodbath of the “Pseudo-liberal” movement. Today quite literally resets everything- the idea of actual secularism, the much needed and awaited debate of Islamic reforms, and our collective purging of extremism, intersectional harmony has to be pursued now- all to envision a converging progressive idea- “To build a better future”. But most importantly cleanse our every last bit of “Anglo-Imperialist” idealogues, have a robust discussion, and set the precedent of making narratives from some Washington D.C. cheap pasty white professors to India and its citizens. Never again. Never Forget.

‘A future historian might record 5 August 2020 as the day secularism died in India’ can only be true if the historian happens to be a leftist. This is unlikely to happen now and in future which belongs to true Indians and not crooked leftists with imported mindset. Therefore, Yogendra Yadav’s dream of leftists continuing to write Indian history in future would remain a dream only. Henceforth the history of India would be written by those who understands and love Indian culture. Leftists goons’control over Indian history is gone forever and for a good cause. Henceforth India’s secularism would require one to integrate with Indian culture and not harm the Indian way of living.

Congress party can , now, take up the cause of Shri Krishan Janam Bhoomi and Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple to upstage BJP. The vast majority of Hindus want liberation of these two prominent place of worship also. Fake or pseudo- secularism is dead a long time ago . For Congress Party it may not be difficult to find some political space. IT may be difficult for some journalists to change their views so suddenly who are sleeping in long bygone Nehruvian era. But many of them will toe the party line as a famous General of India has termed them— PRESSITUTES . They can be paid something NOW , with the promise to enrich them in future . Mostly it is what comes in to pockets becomes ideology . Pro -Hindu narrative is not going to exit too soon from political mind space. Act now .

You and your secularism is nothing but Anti Hindu and pro Muslim , after 1947 Indian partition by Muslims , India should have done population exchange and develop after 1947, with high Muslim growth rate , more Pakistans will be demanded by Indian Muslims and like 1947 , Congress , communists and so called secularists like Yadav will support creation of Islamic states , but they will never go to Muslim majority country’s , why ?? Because Muslims won’t tolerated this secularism nonsense and wipe out communists , secularists , that’s why you will never see a communist and secularists in Muslim majority countries,they survive only in Non Muslim majority countries.