Thursday's order merely specifies agencies authorised to implement action, but amendments giving more power to central govt were passed — without discussion — in 2008.
Which humanitarian crisis should be prioritised, which words are ‘simple’ enough to avoid hurt feelings, or who is a ‘true Indian’, are not questions warranting court input.
New Delhi: During Operation Sindoor, the United States which had received intelligence suggesting that India had launched BrahMos cruise missiles to strike targets inside...
To complete the symmetry of the architecture of an all seeing state, extend this power to telephones as well. All of us will then truly be living in glass houses. 2. If the apex court wants its judgment on privacy being a fundamental right to have meaning, it should strike down this order, never mind which government initiated the move.
who will they have to show cause? Chibber didnt ask him.
Is it a magistrate or some impartial authority? Then maybe the problems go away.
To complete the symmetry of the architecture of an all seeing state, extend this power to telephones as well. All of us will then truly be living in glass houses. 2. If the apex court wants its judgment on privacy being a fundamental right to have meaning, it should strike down this order, never mind which government initiated the move.