What Trump says and what he does are two different things. There are strong reasons to believe that US’ Indo-Pacific strategy stops at the India-Pakistan border.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
It is India which has always displayed hostility towards Pakistan. The frequent publication of the articles, like this, proves how Pakistan-obsessed the Indians are. Modi’s party won elections on anti-Pakistan jingoist slogans, Indian media is full of evening talk-shows full of war-like rooms devising plans how to invade Pakistan, break it up, support terrorists in regions like Balochistan. Every other day, a pro-Modi Army Chief gives a statement on Pakistan.
Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognised disputed Muslim-majority territory where Indian military has carried out human-rights violations.. Therefore, do not portray it as a territory that belonged to India.
India together with Israel carved out a good script to influence Donald Trump against Pakistan. But fortunately, the country which radical Hindus refer to as a ‘beggar-state’ was re-approached by the U.S. Donald Trump turned against India by imposing tariffs and removing special status to India.
Impress Donald Trump by pleading senior military officers to give similar jingoist statements on China, they way they give on Pakistan, rather than hosting the Chinese President Xi at Chennai.
Is it really up for debate that the US does not sure India schools of isolating Pakistan? This was never a stated goal of the USA. But the US does want to isolate Iran, and India openly disagrees with that goal and instead wants cooperation with Iran. Does India think it can reap all the benefits of the US without sharing any of the burden of the US?
The Indo-Pacific plan does indeed end at the India Pakistan border because the western border of India is by America’s definition the westernmost extent of the Indo-Pacific region. Hence why Oman and African countries are not a part of the plan.
It is India which has always displayed hostility towards Pakistan. The frequent publication of the articles, like this, proves how Pakistan-obsessed the Indians are. Modi’s party won elections on anti-Pakistan jingoist slogans, Indian media is full of evening talk-shows full of war-like rooms devising plans how to invade Pakistan, break it up, support terrorists in regions like Balochistan. Every other day, a pro-Modi Army Chief gives a statement on Pakistan.
Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognised disputed Muslim-majority territory where Indian military has carried out human-rights violations.. Therefore, do not portray it as a territory that belonged to India.
India together with Israel carved out a good script to influence Donald Trump against Pakistan. But fortunately, the country which radical Hindus refer to as a ‘beggar-state’ was re-approached by the U.S. Donald Trump turned against India by imposing tariffs and removing special status to India.
Impress Donald Trump by pleading senior military officers to give similar jingoist statements on China, they way they give on Pakistan, rather than hosting the Chinese President Xi at Chennai.
Is it really up for debate that the US does not sure India schools of isolating Pakistan? This was never a stated goal of the USA. But the US does want to isolate Iran, and India openly disagrees with that goal and instead wants cooperation with Iran. Does India think it can reap all the benefits of the US without sharing any of the burden of the US?
The Indo-Pacific plan does indeed end at the India Pakistan border because the western border of India is by America’s definition the westernmost extent of the Indo-Pacific region. Hence why Oman and African countries are not a part of the plan.