Trump was enraged by what he called 'misleading headlines' about five US tanker planes reportedly hit in Saudi Arabia. He singled out NYT, WSJ, and other “Lowlife” newspapers.
Times Now, India Today, News 18 India and ABP News showed live coverage of protests over claims that a new definition of the Aravalli Hills would allow large-scale mining.
TV news channels assured viewers that once the cloud-seeding was completed, rain could be expected anytime. 'Jab chaho, baarish kar lo,' claimed Times Now Navbharat.
Shefali Jariwala’s sudden death has been attributed to heart failure. No mischief is suspected. But her dying and the cause(s) of her death have animated news channels.
What’s clear is that TV new coverage of modern warfare is more eye-catching: boots on the ground have been replaced by flying machines, allowing news channels to play video war games.
China patiently invested capital, skill and technology in coal gasification. Unlike it, we won’t move from words to action. As crude prices decline, we lose interest.
Papa don’t preach!
Why don’t you and your reporters visit Manipur in person and report on the situation? Why ask others to risk their lives?
Do it yourself and set a precedent for others to follow.
and do what ? pour kerosene over already inflamed ethnic tensions which have a history of tens of decades ? the author seems to have too much of a false confidence in Indian journos having the depth of understanding to even sit through a 30 minute discussion such a issue leave alone discussing it over days. more so when the journos are more concerned with showing one or the other side as evil or conspirators. The writer cleverly skirts the origin of the problem and expects other journos to do the work ?
Papa don’t preach!
Why don’t you and your reporters visit Manipur in person and report on the situation? Why ask others to risk their lives?
Do it yourself and set a precedent for others to follow.
and do what ? pour kerosene over already inflamed ethnic tensions which have a history of tens of decades ? the author seems to have too much of a false confidence in Indian journos having the depth of understanding to even sit through a 30 minute discussion such a issue leave alone discussing it over days. more so when the journos are more concerned with showing one or the other side as evil or conspirators. The writer cleverly skirts the origin of the problem and expects other journos to do the work ?