Eight scholars from American, Swiss and French universities and World Bank looked into the dataset of cases heard during 2010–2018 in India’s 7,000+ district and subordinate trial courts.
Data shows that in some cases, new courts and transfer courts performed worse than courts which did not transfer cases to new courts to help with backlog.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
India-Russia JV is also racing to deliver 7,000 more AK-203 assault rifles by 15 Aug. These are currently being made with 50% indigenisation and this will surge to 100% by 31 December.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
Heartening to see that authors have not found evidence of bias.
It’s a shame that only muslims, as a religious minority, were analysed, although, their methods to identify religious affiliation may not have been very accurate for identifying Sikhs, Jains, maybe Christians too. They wouldn’t be able to identify atheists for sure. It would’ve been interesting to understand those trends as well.
The long list of disclaimers at the end almost gave the feeling that they didn’t find a bias.
Two things are evident from the study. Firstly, the Indian judiciary is by and large unbiased. Secondly, and possibly more worryingly, the authors seem disappointed by the absence of bias and make multiple statements to state that there could still be a bias against Muslims. They seem not to even consider or rather suggest that there could be a possibility that the opposite could also be true; that it is biased against the majority.
Ideally, it would be better to state the findings rather than issue multiple caveats. But then if these go against the popular notion of liberal elite then it definitely warrants multiple qualifications.
Why these foreign nationals want to research Indian judiciary on religious bases !!! Donot allow these studies, Indian Leftists, Liberals and Muslims and Christians will manipulate all research abd give bad publicity to Hindus.
Coming from westerners then it must be right…isn’t it?
There is a fundamental flaw in your research.
The premise of your research is 14 percent mawali maskin community has 7 percent judges.
This represents a bias, among other access judgments is favorable as well.
You should have compared mawali maskin community data with parsis jews of this country and you would have found your answers.
I haven’t started on those 7 percent judges. That will bare open all sense of propriety and secularism once you start reviewing are conduct, judgments against 80 percent of the population.
Your bias has already tampered the questions and conditioned to fit the that narrative or premise.
I tell you what woke crowd gets away with shabby work, unquestioned hypothesis and get rewarded in return.
This is totally wrong, the courts must always be biased against muslims.
Heartening to see that authors have not found evidence of bias.
It’s a shame that only muslims, as a religious minority, were analysed, although, their methods to identify religious affiliation may not have been very accurate for identifying Sikhs, Jains, maybe Christians too. They wouldn’t be able to identify atheists for sure. It would’ve been interesting to understand those trends as well.
The long list of disclaimers at the end almost gave the feeling that they didn’t find a bias.
Two things are evident from the study. Firstly, the Indian judiciary is by and large unbiased. Secondly, and possibly more worryingly, the authors seem disappointed by the absence of bias and make multiple statements to state that there could still be a bias against Muslims. They seem not to even consider or rather suggest that there could be a possibility that the opposite could also be true; that it is biased against the majority.
Ideally, it would be better to state the findings rather than issue multiple caveats. But then if these go against the popular notion of liberal elite then it definitely warrants multiple qualifications.
Why these foreign nationals want to research Indian judiciary on religious bases !!! Donot allow these studies, Indian Leftists, Liberals and Muslims and Christians will manipulate all research abd give bad publicity to Hindus.
Coming from westerners then it must be right…isn’t it?
There is a fundamental flaw in your research.
The premise of your research is 14 percent mawali maskin community has 7 percent judges.
This represents a bias, among other access judgments is favorable as well.
You should have compared mawali maskin community data with parsis jews of this country and you would have found your answers.
I haven’t started on those 7 percent judges. That will bare open all sense of propriety and secularism once you start reviewing are conduct, judgments against 80 percent of the population.
Your bias has already tampered the questions and conditioned to fit the that narrative or premise.
I tell you what woke crowd gets away with shabby work, unquestioned hypothesis and get rewarded in return.
Sorry your dissertation is denied.