Pakistan General Sahir Shamshad Mirza's call at a science symposium in Islamabed directly contradicts India’s stance that Kashmir is a strictly bilateral issue.
No one has the right to belittle anyone who served our nation, says Annamalai, defending Vikram Misri. Centre will find terrorists behind Pahalgam attack, he adds.
During the 1971 war, India blew up the Hussainiwala Bridge, which connects 15 villages near the Ferozepur border to the rest of Punjab across the Sutlej River.
India’s Operation Sindoor punished Pakistan for the Pahalgam attack. So why agree to a ceasefire? Hot debrief on India’s military logic, Pakistan’s miscalculation, and the information war.
The end India should seek is the construction of Pakistan other than the country its generals and clerics have imagined into being. Furious words and spasms of rage won't cut it.
They had just sat down to eat when something struck their car & a blast tore through the area, engulfing them in flames. All family members suffered critical burns & serious injuries.
Ceasefire or no ceasefire, we must pursue Pahalgam terrorists, said AIMIM chief, adding that he wished Modi 'announced ceasefire rather than President of a foreign country'.
General MM Naravane’s memoir—Four Stars of Destiny—reveals that he was left hanging by political leadership for more than two hours as Chinese tanks drove towards Indian positions.
The key to fighting a war successfully, or even launching it, is a clear objective. That’s an entirely political call. It isn’t emotional or purely military.
DUde, You HAVE to stop quoting “genius minds of the west” without providing sufficient context. And you HAVE to start giving concrete solutions instead of theory upon theory. Give some examples, or actual situations where your theory has worked. Only rubbishing India’s efforts all the time makes you sound like a perpetual pessimist. Don’t be the classis scholar who revels in the problems, but has no real solutions, only solutions on paper. This is a recurring theme in your articles. You glorify some obscure “scholar” from the west, and provide vague solutions which no one understands. In your interview with the lady from the west, it was embarrassing to see you prostrate in front of her “wisdom” while she was busy pooh-poohin India’s capability to strike back. Your (her) claims fell flat when the very next day India hit inside Pak with missiles.
DUde, You HAVE to stop quoting “genius minds of the west” without providing sufficient context. And you HAVE to start giving concrete solutions instead of theory upon theory. Give some examples, or actual situations where your theory has worked. Only rubbishing India’s efforts all the time makes you sound like a perpetual pessimist. Don’t be the classis scholar who revels in the problems, but has no real solutions, only solutions on paper. This is a recurring theme in your articles. You glorify some obscure “scholar” from the west, and provide vague solutions which no one understands. In your interview with the lady from the west, it was embarrassing to see you prostrate in front of her “wisdom” while she was busy pooh-poohin India’s capability to strike back. Your (her) claims fell flat when the very next day India hit inside Pak with missiles.