Haren Pandya was a minister in the Narendra Modi-led state government in Gujarat. He was shot dead on 26 March 2003 in Ahmedabad near Law Garden during his morning walk.
Order for 87 MALE drones will be split between 2 Indian firms in 64:36 ratio to ensure there are 2 independent manufacturing lines with at least 60% indigenous components.
The India-South Africa series-defining fact is the catastrophic decline of Indian red ball cricket where a visiting team can mock us with the 'grovel' word.
Finally Justice has been done. The SC should have also have passed scriptures against the Judges who had acquitted these accused .
And should have also taken Rana Ayub to task for spreading evil lies. The court completely debunked her book. “ In her book, Ayyub had stated that Pandya’s case was like a volcano.
The court, however, chose not to rely on it, asserting that the book was “based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value”, and there was a likelihood of it being “politically motivated”.”
I am not sure if a case can be made out but she should be charged with sedition
Your headline of this news story is wrong or I should say mischievous. It is not the first time that the judgement of the lower court has been overturned by the Supreme Court. Sometime the lower court does not weigh in a particular evidence properly, which leads to overturning of their view by higher court.
Finally Justice has been done. The SC should have also have passed scriptures against the Judges who had acquitted these accused .
And should have also taken Rana Ayub to task for spreading evil lies. The court completely debunked her book. “ In her book, Ayyub had stated that Pandya’s case was like a volcano.
The court, however, chose not to rely on it, asserting that the book was “based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value”, and there was a likelihood of it being “politically motivated”.”
I am not sure if a case can be made out but she should be charged with sedition
Your headline of this news story is wrong or I should say mischievous. It is not the first time that the judgement of the lower court has been overturned by the Supreme Court. Sometime the lower court does not weigh in a particular evidence properly, which leads to overturning of their view by higher court.