Haren Pandya was a minister in the Narendra Modi-led state government in Gujarat. He was shot dead on 26 March 2003 in Ahmedabad near Law Garden during his morning walk.
The last time this matter flared up was when Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a very similar directive in April, called for the relocation of stray dogs in the capital.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
Finally Justice has been done. The SC should have also have passed scriptures against the Judges who had acquitted these accused .
And should have also taken Rana Ayub to task for spreading evil lies. The court completely debunked her book. “ In her book, Ayyub had stated that Pandya’s case was like a volcano.
The court, however, chose not to rely on it, asserting that the book was “based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value”, and there was a likelihood of it being “politically motivated”.”
I am not sure if a case can be made out but she should be charged with sedition
Your headline of this news story is wrong or I should say mischievous. It is not the first time that the judgement of the lower court has been overturned by the Supreme Court. Sometime the lower court does not weigh in a particular evidence properly, which leads to overturning of their view by higher court.
Finally Justice has been done. The SC should have also have passed scriptures against the Judges who had acquitted these accused .
And should have also taken Rana Ayub to task for spreading evil lies. The court completely debunked her book. “ In her book, Ayyub had stated that Pandya’s case was like a volcano.
The court, however, chose not to rely on it, asserting that the book was “based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value”, and there was a likelihood of it being “politically motivated”.”
I am not sure if a case can be made out but she should be charged with sedition
Your headline of this news story is wrong or I should say mischievous. It is not the first time that the judgement of the lower court has been overturned by the Supreme Court. Sometime the lower court does not weigh in a particular evidence properly, which leads to overturning of their view by higher court.