I’ve been told that few people really care about the no-dating-at-office rule. Dating in 2025 is an actual threat to life, so a threat to career is practically a minor inconvenience.
Imagine the divine devotion of Meera, the charitable enterprise of Mother Teresa, and the financial aspirations of a girlboss—dating someone for his ‘potential’ in 2024 takes all of that.
A Delhi-based IAS aspirant got scammed for 1.2 lakh on the first date. Meanwhile, a seasoned scammer opened a Cameo account for his fans. Dating apps are the newest haven for cons.
Navigating dating apps is as risky as trading stocks. It makes sense to spread our assets—school teachers, DJs or public policy nerds; diversity is important.
The Malimath Committee had recommended that all prosecutors should work in close cooperation with the police department. The present trend, however, is to the contrary.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
The Chinese are said to have hired ex-fighter pilots & air force operators from NATO countries over the past several years to help them fine-tune their operational & flying capabilities.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
Office “romances” are just ways to get laid outside of marriage. A few, especially women, also use this as a convenient way to work up the management chain. When the quid pro quo does not deliver the expected returns, the woman can easily file a case of PoSH and destroy the man.
Having watched a few cases of PoSH proceedings at my workplace, am pretty convinced that the man’s version of events is always assumed to be a bunch of lies. Even witness testimonies which match the man’s version of events are considered suspect.
The damage to career and reputation is permanent.
Women use workplace romance as a way to walk up the management ladder. Usually this is the path of least resistance and maximum returns.
Also, if the man involved does not give the agreed upon rating and increments, the woman can simply file a case of PoSH case and ruin the man’s career and personal reputation.
Office “romances” are just ways to get laid outside of marriage. A few, especially women, also use this as a convenient way to work up the management chain. When the quid pro quo does not deliver the expected returns, the woman can easily file a case of PoSH and destroy the man.
Having watched a few cases of PoSH proceedings at my workplace, am pretty convinced that the man’s version of events is always assumed to be a bunch of lies. Even witness testimonies which match the man’s version of events are considered suspect.
The damage to career and reputation is permanent.
Women use workplace romance as a way to walk up the management ladder. Usually this is the path of least resistance and maximum returns.
Also, if the man involved does not give the agreed upon rating and increments, the woman can simply file a case of PoSH case and ruin the man’s career and personal reputation.
Cringe is Ms. Ratan Priya’s defining identity now. That’s what makes her so yuck.