Ram Chander Jangra referred to 'CID reports' to support claim that '700 girls' went missing from villages near Tikri & Singhu borders. No such report exists, says senior CID officer.
The BJP may enjoy ideological dominance today, but counter-hegemonic politics has deeper cultural resources. If we are determined and intelligent, we shall win.
From Champaran to Tebhaga, farmers’ movements have been political. But that took a turn in the 1980s-90s, when the chorus for ‘apolitical movements’ grew.
It turns out in Pakistan, one can fail at any kind of war with India and yet win accolades. Gen Pervez Musharraf lost the 1999 Kargil war yet became president. Gen Ayub Khan, who lost in 1965 as a Field Marshal, would be proud of me today.
Diving into workings of Gurugram fulfilment centre, Abhinav Singh, V-P (Ops) at Amazon India, offers insights into how company manages logistics, in conversation with ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta.
Trump is not the first American president to propose such a defence system. Ronald Reagan proposed a space-centric Strategic Defense Initiative in 1983, but it never took off.
Pakistani establishments and their proxies are prone to severe, predictable 7-year-itch. Each step up the escalation ladder buys India about this many years of deterrence on average.
BJP MP Ramchandra Jangra’s statement is baseless and aimed at defaming the farmers and hurting the dignity of an MP. Mr Jangra’s statement is worthy of strong condemnation.
What exactly is the issue with the MP’s remarks?
The “movement” was solely led by Jats. Jat farmers were the only ones who had grievances against the govt. And these grievances had nothing to do with the pros and cons of the farm laws which were much needed and would have heralded a new era in Indian agriculture if implemented. The real reason for the “protests” was that the Jats felt left out of the power structures across states as the BJP simply refused to court them. Amit Shah had stitched up an innovative social coalition which enabled the BJP to win elections even without the support of Jats – a dominant caste, especially in Haryana and Punjab.
The Jat attitude towards women is not exactly a secret. The whole world knows how Jat society treats women. It’s quite natural that young women would go missing in villages where the Jats had camped for long.
Instead of criticizing the MP, the police should seriously investigate the claims made by him. Justice must be done to the women who, very unfortunately, became fodder for these “protestors”.
BJP MP Ramchandra Jangra’s statement is baseless and aimed at defaming the farmers and hurting the dignity of an MP. Mr Jangra’s statement is worthy of strong condemnation.
What exactly is the issue with the MP’s remarks?
The “movement” was solely led by Jats. Jat farmers were the only ones who had grievances against the govt. And these grievances had nothing to do with the pros and cons of the farm laws which were much needed and would have heralded a new era in Indian agriculture if implemented. The real reason for the “protests” was that the Jats felt left out of the power structures across states as the BJP simply refused to court them. Amit Shah had stitched up an innovative social coalition which enabled the BJP to win elections even without the support of Jats – a dominant caste, especially in Haryana and Punjab.
The Jat attitude towards women is not exactly a secret. The whole world knows how Jat society treats women. It’s quite natural that young women would go missing in villages where the Jats had camped for long.
Instead of criticizing the MP, the police should seriously investigate the claims made by him. Justice must be done to the women who, very unfortunately, became fodder for these “protestors”.