In Episode 402 of #CutTheClutter, Shekhar Gupta explains what happened before Justice Muralidhar’s transfer was suddenly notified on the night of 26 February.
Justice Muralidhar had said the Delhi Police should be guided by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Lalita Kumari case and go strictly by the mandate of the law.
An Air India pilot has moved the Delhi High Court over his suspension stating that his treatment for his hair fall caused a false positive for alcohol in his breath analyser test.
The Delhi HC judge, known for 'bold pronouncements', is at the heart of the latest row in the judiciary as proposals to transfer him have been stalled.
Earlier this week, Delhi HC set aside a trial court order acquitting Sajjan Kumar and sentenced him to life imprisonment for his role 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
The IndiGo crisis is nothing short of a threat to India’s stability. Could it be an experiment? Can this happen in any other crucial sector like power or railways?
RBI Handbook of Statistics shows state’s GSDP has more than doubled in past decade, finishing second behind Maharashtra. It has performed well across health & education parameters as well.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
Judiciary has allowed itself to be captive of Executive most willingly. While Justice Murlidharan is quoted as having said the he will not allow another 1984 to take place under this court and his transfer to make it possible and show to those who believe that Judiciary can save the day. Since the day Modi came to power in 2014 his first job was to pass a bill make it an act which will allow Executive to manipulate the Judiciary which did not succeed. and in his second term he has made sure that despite that the Judiciary could be controlled and manipulated to which the Justices and Chiefs would not mind. Is it a match fixing with Judiciary and executive?
There are some major discrepancies here. Only a person who appears in courts can make them out. At night, the Registry of the court is closed. Where did Suroor Mander present the petition? Whom did she contact to see that the matter was referred to the senior most judge available? Next day, her father presents another petition seeking direction to file FIR against specified BJP leaders. The over enthusiastic judge gets carried away and hears the matter at 12.30 am. What an ungodly time to hear a petition, and give directions without hearing the other side! He could have directed the petitioner to approach the Police Commissioner and hear the matter in the open court next morning. Proceedings in the open court are always safe for the parties and also for the judge. If such prudence is not adhered to this kind of embarrassment occurs.
Judiciary has allowed itself to be captive of Executive most willingly. While Justice Murlidharan is quoted as having said the he will not allow another 1984 to take place under this court and his transfer to make it possible and show to those who believe that Judiciary can save the day. Since the day Modi came to power in 2014 his first job was to pass a bill make it an act which will allow Executive to manipulate the Judiciary which did not succeed. and in his second term he has made sure that despite that the Judiciary could be controlled and manipulated to which the Justices and Chiefs would not mind. Is it a match fixing with Judiciary and executive?
Gururaj means procedural delays are important than victims plea.
There are some major discrepancies here. Only a person who appears in courts can make them out. At night, the Registry of the court is closed. Where did Suroor Mander present the petition? Whom did she contact to see that the matter was referred to the senior most judge available? Next day, her father presents another petition seeking direction to file FIR against specified BJP leaders. The over enthusiastic judge gets carried away and hears the matter at 12.30 am. What an ungodly time to hear a petition, and give directions without hearing the other side! He could have directed the petitioner to approach the Police Commissioner and hear the matter in the open court next morning. Proceedings in the open court are always safe for the parties and also for the judge. If such prudence is not adhered to this kind of embarrassment occurs.
Arrogance and misplaced Sense of Infallibility.
Extremely good judiciary is controlled by corrupt BJP